tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.comments2024-03-19T10:14:26.982+05:30Jayasree SaranathanJayasree Saranathan http://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comBlogger9663125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-69055542150067396762024-03-16T08:07:32.004+05:302024-03-16T08:07:32.004+05:30ππππππππππππππππChudamani Srinivasanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17792410645618025874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-35672578178405818202024-03-13T23:04:06.475+05:302024-03-13T23:04:06.475+05:30There are many other Muslim writers who have recor...There are many other Muslim writers who have recorded the demolition of Janmasthan temple.<br />Read this<br />https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2010/10/demolition-of-ram-janma-bhoomi-as.htmlJayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-16634389552311804932024-03-13T22:59:56.151+05:302024-03-13T22:59:56.151+05:30Only Krishna's date came before. That doesn...Only Krishna's date came before. That doesn't match as you can see every year. We don't have any authentic date in the prior period except Rama's date. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-40715748808780822512024-03-13T22:42:52.272+05:302024-03-13T22:42:52.272+05:30Thank you very much.Thank you very much.Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-85414222504335621842024-03-13T22:42:18.558+05:302024-03-13T22:42:18.558+05:30It is true that the earth experienced many Ice age...It is true that the earth experienced many Ice ages in the past. Infact we are supposed to be in the Ice age even now. So accumulation of ice and the availability of sun light to trigger monsoon rains had alternated in the past. Mankind had existed in 28 such cycles. That is the derivation. Not necessary that the avataras repeated every time. However, geological avataras such as Matsya (triggered by floods after Ice melted), Varaha (land rising from water) and Vamana (land going under water) could have happened in all the cycles. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-610646081994290082024-03-13T08:06:21.390+05:302024-03-13T08:06:21.390+05:30With regards to Mirza Jan's book - Hadiqah-i S...With regards to Mirza Jan's book - Hadiqah-i Shuhada I know many people refer to this reference, with regards to the Babri Masjid topic. But there is also one counter article to the same reference. See <br /><a href="https://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/iaf/article/view/1588" rel="nofollow">https://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/iaf/article/view/1588</a> which says Mirza Jan's book is not reliable. Unfortunately, the counter article is in German (The abstract in the above is in English).<br />Just FYI.Sundarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03563514676195338461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-29472599214391843342024-03-13T01:19:44.072+05:302024-03-13T01:19:44.072+05:30Thank you. Not sure if you have addressed this alr...Thank you. Not sure if you have addressed this already - does this mismatch occur also for other known birth occurrences, such as Krishnaβs birth parameters, since Krishnaβs birth also predates the comet hit? πKKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03029569899029107485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-85204995482165679952024-03-12T12:02:30.004+05:302024-03-12T12:02:30.004+05:30HEARTY CONGRATULATIONS MAM !! Everyone knows your ...HEARTY CONGRATULATIONS MAM !! Everyone knows your efforts are truly commendable. You teach us a lot. We learn a lot from you. Krishnahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15744863515463243171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-46374080376047759042024-03-08T13:20:35.694+05:302024-03-08T13:20:35.694+05:30Namaskaram
Does it mean 28 cycles of ice age took ...Namaskaram<br />Does it mean 28 cycles of ice age took place after which rainfall happened?<br />And is this cycle repeated?<br />Like many Rama and Krishna lived in past.<br />Or it is only happening once?Snehal Trivedihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09621699692463499032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-55667454586460281762024-03-07T00:03:45.762+05:302024-03-07T00:03:45.762+05:30Thanks for confirming the Hasta nakshatra connecti...Thanks for confirming the Hasta nakshatra connection. We are Sama Vedins in my parental side. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-11295172598312957542024-03-07T00:02:23.901+05:302024-03-07T00:02:23.901+05:30This is only prelude. My upcoming will contain man...This is only prelude. My upcoming will contain many more details. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-72603564614040325552024-03-06T10:38:48.981+05:302024-03-06T10:38:48.981+05:30Hi Mam,
So nice, painstakingly researched , but th...Hi Mam,<br />So nice, painstakingly researched , but the series ended too soon!! <br />Was expecting daily posts like Vikatan vara idazh Sujatha Stories, though not qualified, felt that , in this series , it appears you had not much of the data internally in the VR or other texts , and that too little references or i would call them anchors to hold and traverse , yet have done a tremendous feat on fixing dates.<br /><br />Or possible Krishna in his infinite mercy has given so many clues (BG Chap 15.15) as much as he had appeared to make things easier in line with time inarriving at 3136 !!<br /><br />Nice work mam<br />Namaskarams<br />Shankar Bharadhwaj<br /><br /><br />CA Shankar Bharadhwajhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03281459616464413332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-51896082461928347422024-03-03T22:32:04.232+05:302024-03-03T22:32:04.232+05:30Yes mam it is very accurate calculation.
Being Sam...Yes mam it is very accurate calculation.<br />Being Samvedi Bramhana from Kauthumi Shakha, We perform Upakarma in the month of Bhadrapada, Hasta Nakshatra which falls nearly around Shukla Dwitiya in current time.<br />Very thankful to have this knowledge as we are following the rituals even today which was started during the Vedic period.Snehal Trivedihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09621699692463499032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-27684999165860031412024-03-03T19:54:10.657+05:302024-03-03T19:54:10.657+05:30@ Chudamani Srinivasan,
The Gregorian calendar mo...@ Chudamani Srinivasan,<br /><br />The Gregorian calendar months do not match with Vedic months. For example Chitra Varusha Pirappu started on 13th / 14th April 50 years ago. Now it starts on 14th / 15th April. In another 50 years, it will start in 15th / 16th April. The reason is we stick to the background star in the cosmos, i.e., Ashwini as the marker. When the sun enters Aswini, that is Chitra Varusha Pirappu. <br /><br />But the sun keeps moving is space due to which we find it moving gradually over the years. Presently it is moving at the rate of 1 degree in 72 years. Because of this, the sun does not enter Aswini on the same date. It will be 1 degree behind Ashwini in 72 years. To cross 1 degree the Sun takes one day. So after 72 years, it takes one day extra to enter Ashwini. So, instead of 15th/16th April, it will enter Ashwini on 16th / 17th April. Like this for future dates, the Gregorian date will increase, but we will always celebrate Varusha Pirappu on Chiththirai 1st only. <br /><br />For past dates, the dates will be lagging in the same way. That is 100 years ago Varusha Pirappu was on 12th / 13th April. 200 years ago, it was on 11th/ 12th April. Like this in Rama's time in 5114 BCE (7000 + years ago), Chitra varusha pirappu was in January/ December. <br /><br />So, ours is the best system of time keeping because we fix our dates with reference to stars whose movement is not palpable for thousands of years. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-74679209901537147202024-03-03T14:11:09.308+05:302024-03-03T14:11:09.308+05:30 πππππππPlease excuse me if it is wrong. On... πππππππPlease excuse me if it is wrong. One doubt .. April-may is chaitra mass or sravan massChudamani Srinivasanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17792410645618025874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-29577135020334562152024-02-28T10:28:17.406+05:302024-02-28T10:28:17.406+05:30ππππππππππππππππππChudamani Srinivasanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17792410645618025874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-81086795301192300282024-02-27T16:16:58.874+05:302024-02-27T16:16:58.874+05:301. Please don't bring in Julian day or Julian ...1. Please don't bring in Julian day or Julian year. Julian day is preferred for astronomy purposes and not true to the day concept. Julian calendar had missing dates.<br /><br />2. Lakhs of years of Yuga concept was introduced only after Krishna left and Kali Maha yuga was introduced. Before that only Dharma yuga concept was there. No use taking Kali yuga base for pre-Kali times.<br /><br />3. In SS, only the zero degree point (mid point of the equinoctial path) has perfect planetary combination. At other times you cannot use the old calculation. In one of the articles in that series I have shown the different lengths of vedic day recorded in different times in the last 1000 years. The calculation was a reviewed atleast once every century. This can be seen in inability to produce the combination of Rama's birth in SS settings. Even for today SS doesn't show the exact result. Reason being we simply don't know how to calculate and there is no standard calculation. It is same as what scientists say - that rate of precession cannot be extrapolated to all time in the past or future and that it applies only for the present. <br /><br />It is for this reason Siddhantas known as Karana Siddhnatas were written every century or less, as and when they noticed a change in the rate of ayanamsa. Based on that the planetary positions were re-calculated. Panchanga writers will start using the most recent Karana Siddhanta. So one cant get the calculation right with outdated formula. Similarly you can see in Brihat samhita a formula for calculating a date in the Jupiter cycle. It doesn't work. It was written for the period when it was made. We lost continuous monitoring and calculation. <br /><br />The rate of ayanamsa is not constant which is one of the reasons for inability to get the exact combinations. You can check this with eclipse data of the inscriptions and compare with NASA data on eclipses. I did that comparison by taking a random eclipse in every century for 2000 years. You wont get them right with NASA data. <br /><br />I am of the opinion, that only in the upcoming equinoctial cycle, when science would have advanced well, it will start recording the ever changing rate of ayanamsa once the equinox turns forward. <br /><br />4. There is no issue of error of 1 year in Vedic accounting. Kali beginning was 3179 years before Shalivahana shaka. That is how we look at the years. The year numbering, week days etc are continuous in Jhora. As such Raudra was the 0 year. Only when you express time in western astronomy simulator or in Julian calendar, the problem arises. <br /><br />5. I don't understand your question - the error of 1 year. I wrote that there is an error of one tithi before 2nd Sep 3136 BCE. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-11392698720990385822024-02-27T11:01:39.354+05:302024-02-27T11:01:39.354+05:30I did read it (I said in my previous comment - I r...I did read it (I said in my previous comment - I read <b>your post</b> and linked it).<br />Now, JHora shows as you say in your post, after using "Restore default calculation options".<br />Thanks for being with me on this s/w issue.<br />Coming back to your related post (https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2021/03/mathematical-proof-for-why-julian-date.html) - so what is the right way to calculate the vedic year.<br />I calculate the year number as follows (as I picked up from a book on SSS)<br />samvat = (kali_no + 27 + int((kali_no * 211 - 108) / 18000)) % 60<br />But this one also, I am not sure will work - because kali_no is negative. Julian number also will be negative for 5114 BCE.<br />Is the error always 1 year for any date before kali yuga date?<br />Can you please share the correct formula. Thanks!Sundarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03563514676195338461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-8406157972906402432024-02-27T10:21:38.337+05:302024-02-27T10:21:38.337+05:30You have used Julian calendar. I used Gregorian si...You have used Julian calendar. I used Gregorian since we use Gregorian calendar.<br />So change Julian to Gregorian and check. You will get the dates and details I have given.<br />Moreover this proves once again that julian days do not match with our panchanga system. <br />I think you have not read my article on this https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2021/03/mathematical-proof-for-why-julian-date.htmlJayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-69084489934661555272024-02-26T22:38:20.372+05:302024-02-26T22:38:20.372+05:30No. We are missing something. Unfortunately I am u...No. We are missing something. Unfortunately I am unable add screenshot to this comment. As you said in the comment<br />I entered the following data in JHora V8.0<br />Birthdate- Month: January Date:1 Year: -5114 Calendar used: Julian<br />Birthtime- Hours:12 Minutes:10 Seconds:0 (0-24Hrs)<br />City name: Ayodhya (Longitude:82E12 Latitude:26N48<br />Ayanamsa: Traditional Lahiri (285-51-55.46)<br /><br />With these above birth data, I am not seeing Parabhava. I am seeing Viswa-vasu - Karthika<br />Even if I change ayanamsa to SSS - I still see Viswa-vasu-Karthika<br />I wonder if this is anything to do with the fact there is no 0 BCE and while calculating ahargana - it results in +1 before 1BCE?<br />BTW - I read <a href="https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2021/03/mathematical-proof-for-why-julian-date.html" rel="nofollow">your post</a>. I agree with you on that. But do you have a solution or an alternate to kali number (ahargana) or julian day number?Sundarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03563514676195338461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-60491940925158790932024-02-26T17:56:16.738+05:302024-02-26T17:56:16.738+05:30In -5115 Caitra, it shows the previous year's ...In -5115 Caitra, it shows the previous year's name which was Vishwavasu. It was Adhika Caitra then. Next month was Nija caitra Now check from 1st January 5114 BCE (the next year) it will show Parabhava.<br /><br />I noticed that for old days such as this the entire year is shown in the same year name even after Caitra of next year started. Only from Jan 1st, the change of year is shown. That is software mistake. I pointed this out in a couple of articles where the change of year name is not indicated if the year started in December. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-33818719907790863812024-02-25T21:06:41.839+05:302024-02-25T21:06:41.839+05:30Which version of JHora are you using?
What setting...Which version of JHora are you using?<br />What settings are you using?<br />V8.0 of JHora, for the same date/time/place, shows Viswa-vasu as the year.<br />--Sundar With Regards<br />Sundarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03563514676195338461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-44019708011712624482024-02-22T07:45:31.389+05:302024-02-22T07:45:31.389+05:30ππππππππππππππππππππChudamani Srinivasanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17792410645618025874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-38055769626514092472024-02-21T15:06:24.425+05:302024-02-21T15:06:24.425+05:30Dear Shankar Bharadwaj ji,
Thank you very much f...Dear Shankar Bharadwaj ji, <br /><br />Thank you very much for being a keen follower of my articles and encouraging words. It certainly inspires me to write more. This Ramayana series will appear every evening at 6 pm. <br /><br />Regards, <br />JayasreeJayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-66117705724201799472024-02-20T21:15:36.487+05:302024-02-20T21:15:36.487+05:30Nice one , as usual explained in a very simple way...Nice one , as usual explained in a very simple way, looking forward to keep reading like 3136 CA Shankar Bharadhwajhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03281459616464413332noreply@blogger.com