tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post1284604510047214050..comments2024-03-18T22:56:06.696+05:30Comments on Jayasree Saranathan: Challenging Nilesh Oak's dates of Mahabharata and Ramayana. Jayasree Saranathan http://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comBlogger155125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-84563571664319912222022-02-05T09:51:25.065+05:302022-02-05T09:51:25.065+05:30@Nitesh Pingale,
I have done as per our Sanatan s...@Nitesh Pingale,<br /><br />I have done as per our Sanatan system. Read my book. Details given on top of the above article. Write to jayasreebooks@gmail.com to get a hard copy of the book.Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-20909246756748032692022-02-04T23:08:47.714+05:302022-02-04T23:08:47.714+05:30The all dating done as per English dating system i...The all dating done as per English dating system i want to know in sanatan or hindu date system do you have it?Nitesh pingalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17179361322360554721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-1436736074999650932022-01-11T07:02:29.859+05:302022-01-11T07:02:29.859+05:30The whole reason you could write is because Mr. Oa...The whole reason you could write is because Mr. Oak. So instead of debunking theories, why don't you guys sit together agree and give presentation to lesser mortals? Pulling each other legs and one-upmanship is useless! Get on a platform and come up with something better! Either we are sold to the fake history of Europeans or to the internal fights of Indians...non-sense! Ideas and Opinionshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00213317886852469100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-14060320738743216472020-11-01T00:32:39.495+05:302020-11-01T00:32:39.495+05:30Namaste maam.
Interesting research.
I have come ...Namaste maam.<br /><br />Interesting research.<br /><br />I have come across another interesting research by Immanuel Velikovsky regarding the history of formation of our solar system in the book "Worlds in Collision". He took reference from mythologies all over the world from every civilization and made very interesting predictions, like - Venus is later addition to our solar system which was ejected from Jupiter, Moon is hollow and manmade, planets are hollow, Earth is expanding. So the solar system today is not the same as it was a few thousands years ago. So the gravity of Earth must be very low compared to today. There are many references that earlier people were taller compared to us, supporting the expanding earth theory. And many interesting things.<br /><br />https://www.pdfdrive.com/worlds-in-collision-immanuel-velikovsky-e33495375.html<br /><br />Wallace Thornhill has nice explanation of electric universe which follows Velikovsky claims:<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dIreR9h4Ts<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxaP91FdijU<br /><br />and many more.<br /><br />You can go through when you have time. I think you will find it extremely interesting.Partha Sarathi Mishra (ପାର୍ଥ ସାରଥୀ ମିଶ୍ର)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09551522097622176899noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-42190403306280239812020-06-03T11:27:55.968+05:302020-06-03T11:27:55.968+05:30@pandx.
The basis is Jyothisha shastra and the co...@pandx.<br /><br />The basis is Jyothisha shastra and the context in Mahabharata. <br /><br />Read my book for details given in the chapter on Nimitta. If not, read 5th point in Introduction in the preview of the book <br />https://www.amazon.in/MYTH-EPOCH-ARUNDHATI-NILESH-NILKANTH-ebook/dp/B07YVFNQLD/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_pl_foot_top?ie=UTF8<br /><br />Every astronomy reference in Mahabharata and Ramayana can be understood only if one has all round knowledge of Jyothisha. Jyothisha is a very vast subject, oldest in mankind's history and covers every issue under the sun. Mere knowledge of reading the text of Mahabharata, knowledge of Sanskrit and use of simulator cannot help.<br /><br />Coming to the issue, Vyasa mentions 70+ nimittas among which are told A-V, celestial sightings and planetary sightings. A nimitta is temporary (adhruva) and can be terrestrial, atmospheric or a celestial item. The predictions related to it will be known through astrology only. When will a celestial (planetary) position become a nimitta, or part of Ganita (Siddhanta) or horoscopy depends on the context it is used and the purpose. It takes a life time to understand this subject in toto. <br /><br />Read my book. <br />Also read Brihat samhita that has a chapter on nimittas. <br />Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-53023992558447123012020-06-03T04:47:43.909+05:302020-06-03T04:47:43.909+05:30Greeting mam!
what is the basis/evidence of your ...Greeting mam! <br />what is the basis/evidence of your following claim below ?? please advise.<br /><br />The reference to planets and their motion at the start of MB war pertains to Nimittha (निमित्त ) and the results/ predictions connected with planetary motions pertain to astrology, and not exactly about the position of those planets as per astronomy. Therefore one must not take the reference to planets at face value. pandxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05694698902838849130noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-17104848181859090392020-05-24T19:21:17.435+05:302020-05-24T19:21:17.435+05:30@ Phani Kasyap,
Super logic! Oak effect??
Well, ...@ Phani Kasyap,<br /><br />Super logic! Oak effect??<br /><br />Well, if you rely on four tusked elephant, what prevented you from quoting the other reference in the same Valmiki Ramayana on Pandyan city Kavaatam? The vanaras were asked by Sugreeva to search in Kavaatam. Do you know that Kavaatam came into existence only 7000 years ago? <br /><br />Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-70573818810536796482020-05-24T17:37:58.460+05:302020-05-24T17:37:58.460+05:30I disagree mam...In Valmiki Ramayana, Hanuman ente...I disagree mam...In Valmiki Ramayana, Hanuman enters Lanka and the description was given regarding Four Tusked elephants... According to current science,these Four-Tusked elephants were known as Mastodontoidea, which are said to have evolved around 38 million years ago and became extinct about 15 million years ago.By this we can say that Ramayana might have happened around 18 million years ago... Definitely not in recent treta yuga... It happened in 24th Treta Yuga... Science is evolving and we can't say that its wrong if it's unproven...Phani Kasyaphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06637406024949285628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-74971311364393561142020-05-24T17:13:27.936+05:302020-05-24T17:13:27.936+05:30@ Phani Kasyap,
Please look at the sidebar for t...@ Phani Kasyap, <br /><br />Please look at the sidebar for the 4 blogs following this blog you have commented. Those blogs - of 4 articles in a series will solve your doubts. <br /><br />Anyway let me give the link to the 1st part in that series in which you will find the links to other 3.<br />https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2018/01/divya-and-dharma-two-sides-of-yuga.html<br /><br />The article begins like this...<br /><br />(sample paragraphs)<br /><br />Issues and inconsistencies:<br /><br />The following are the basic and the most commonly aired views on Yugas and related issues. The issues themselves look untenable in the face of the inconsistencies ingrained in them.<br /><br />Issue 1: When we say ‘yuga’, many people think that it is about the four yugas namely, Satya or Krta, Treta, Dvapara and Kali maha yugas each running into lakhs of years. Of these we are in the Kali Maha yuga, something well established in the Sankalpa mantras. The preceding yuga of Dwapara must have gone on for 8,64,000 years and Ramayana must have occurred before that as it had happened in Treta Yuga.<br /><br />Inconsistency: To say that Rama was born anytime before 8, 64,000 years sounds completely irrational, because the Homo sapiens that we are, have evolved only 3, 15,000 years ago. So by this Yuga scale we are putting Ramayana in an unrealistic time period when man was not yet born. This issue also derides the wisdom of the rishis, in that, those who had conceived the yuga scale running into millions of years that match with reality, could not conceive the time period of man........ (continue reading in that link) <br /><br />Or you can read all the 4 together in downloadable form in academia <br />https://www.academia.edu/36652239/Yuga_classification_-_how_Yuga_must_be_understood<br /><br />Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-28008419831097598662020-05-24T13:55:31.567+05:302020-05-24T13:55:31.567+05:30Hello Mam... Excellent one about Mahabharatha...I ...Hello Mam... Excellent one about Mahabharatha...I have a question related to Ramayana... Valmiki Ramayana says it happened in 24th Treta Yuga... Now we are in 28th Kaliyuga...So as per the current dating of Ramayana it happened on 28th Treta Yuga...This means Ramayana was repeated or dating was wrong...Please say your views on this...Phani Kasyaphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06637406024949285628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-29125271555283736192020-05-19T15:37:43.689+05:302020-05-19T15:37:43.689+05:30@ Unknown's comment above:- Sample of how half...@ Unknown's comment above:- Sample of how half baked knowledge gives rise to quarter baked knowledge. Period. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-63350109514951863182020-05-18T15:09:36.102+05:302020-05-18T15:09:36.102+05:30It was Vedvvyasa who wrote Arundhati was in front ...It was Vedvvyasa who wrote Arundhati was in front of Vasistha when Mahabharata war was started, so I am not sure why the religious feeling of Hindus is hurt. Please don't make the post-religious and political. Mr. Nilesh oak could be wrong in his findings but I believe he has done his research keeping the Arundhati and Vasishta as the base. He has talked 215 references or astronomical calculations better than those who used very few which he has explained clearly in his video conference. He has also given examples of tusked elephants and candelabra to prove his claim. He also showed references to demons living in America based on Valmiki Ramayana. He also explained how Indians are fooled by the Aryan invasion as many are trapped by that theory. I believe more research and depth are needed by other historians open-mindedly instead of criticizing others. He also explained how Dwarka was underwater based on the evidence. I was amazed by his facts and explanation.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12362341961933527427noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-37754632648538010522020-05-02T00:57:20.608+05:302020-05-02T00:57:20.608+05:30Dear Shri Atul garg and Jayasreeji,
It is not Nil...Dear Shri Atul garg and Jayasreeji,<br /><br />It is not Nilesh Oak alone about his blind support to the 5561 BCE of Dr, Vartak, even Prof Narahari Acharji is very adamant about his support to the 3067 BCE date of Prof. Raghavan. Prof. Raghavan was probably carried away by the celebration of the Gita jayanti in Margashirsha Shukla-Ekadashi, which is known as the Mokshada Ekadashi. Presently Acharji has a great supporter in Dr, Manish Pandit. They try to ignore the landmark date of 3102 BCE, when Lord Krishna passed away. Astronomically too the Suryasiddhanta and Aryabhatiya support the 3102 BCE year of the passing away of Lord Krishna and the end of Yudhisthira's reign. This is also supported by the Pauranic timeline using the Saptarshi or Laukika calendar, apart from several other evidences. <br /><br />Coming to the Saptarshi calendar, the Saptarshis left Magha in 3076 BCE. Saptarshi calendar assigns one hundred years to one nakshatra, and this is an empirical calendar. Varaha Mihira estimated that the Saptarshis actually stay 600 years in one nakshatra. The TIFR scientists found that Saptarshis stay many centuries in each of the nakshatras they visit, except in the Pushya, where the Saptasrhis stay about 100 years. i will not go to those details. <br /><br />Using the Saptarshi calendar, one can cross-check the pauranic dates, if one wants to. The pauranic time-line do conform to the Saptarshi calendar. Though the Saptarshi calendar started from the Saptarshi's stay in Magha during the period of 3177 BCE to 3077 BCE, some unscrupulous people have tried to extend the use the Saptarshi calendar even for assigning dates to events earlier than 3177 BCE.<br /><br />Best wishes<br />Sunil K. Bhattacharjya <br /><br />Sunil K. Bhattacharjyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311674759297199401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-68592487825406189922020-05-01T23:33:57.514+05:302020-05-01T23:33:57.514+05:30@Atul Garg,
In addition to Magha reference there...@Atul Garg, <br /><br />In addition to Magha reference there is one more available from Puranas already discussed by Kota Venketachalam, on Saptarishis in Krittika star at the time of birth of Parikshit. This establishes the cycle to be clockwise. I have deduced the beginning of the cycle at Kali 25 when the Saptrishis were at Mrigashirsha (Taurus 24.27˚). Starting from this, the Saptarishis will be in the 2nd degree of Magha in the Yudhishtira Shaka year 518. <br /><br />For details read my book critiquing Oak's Mahabharata date. <br /><br />Click this link to know the sub-titles covered by me including Saptarishi cycle that started 25 years after Kali yuga began. <br /><br />https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2019/10/my-book-myth-of-epoch-of-arundhati-of.html<br /><br />Links to my book given in that blog.<br /><br />You will also see in that link the astro map of the Kali Yuga date, 22nd January 3101 BCE, Pramathi year, Amavasya, Sun and Moon in Aswini, all planets except Rahu at close to zero degree Aries and at zero ayanamsa (tropical vernal equinox coinciding with sidereal vernal equinox). 35 years before that the Mahabharata war happened (23rd October 3136 BCE)<br /><br />For your information the date of Mahabharata is already known to people except Nilesh Oak and the current generation disconnected from tradition. Every inscription mentions the Kali date. Time keeping is continuing in traditional Hindu homes even today, particularly in Tamilnadu. Most other researchers were trying to validate the traditional date but could not, with the planetary combinations they see in their simulators. That is why most of them got sometime around 3000 BCE. The reason they could not get the date in the simulator was that the simulators are set to tropical zodiac with ayanamsa factor not incorporated. I have given the comparisons in my book. <br /><br />Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-44375717922784438792020-05-01T22:00:08.502+05:302020-05-01T22:00:08.502+05:30Based upon the position of 1st two stars of Saptri...Based upon the position of 1st two stars of Saptrishis in Magha at the time of Parishit's rule, what should be the time of Mahabharat.Atul Garghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05807922851706427819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-57594942074923511712020-03-03T15:11:37.511+05:302020-03-03T15:11:37.511+05:30@Unknown
Pandyans were the first and Muruga aka S...@Unknown<br /><br />Pandyans were the first and Muruga aka Skanda whose original name was Ugra Kumara was the one from whom the Pandyan dynasty descended. Inscriptional evidence there. Subscribe to my You tube channel where I am going to bring out a series of videos tracing Indic / Vedic past in which all that you have raised are addressed. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnDVE60okLzlNi7wfJLEEeAJayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-68909571833160228112020-03-03T00:14:46.950+05:302020-03-03T00:14:46.950+05:30Ma'am, first of all thank you for your researc...Ma'am, first of all thank you for your research. I'm a student and i don't know much like you all do. But i have a doubt and I would like to point out as per your blog you have mentioned that 1st sangam took place around 9990 BC and you have also mentioned that Ikshvaku dynasty started after that. So, according to your blog panyan kings existed prior to Ikshvakus and Manu? <br />But, i have read from many sources on the internet that from Ila came Pururava and from him Yayati and Yayati's sons, the Vedic Panchajana spread out all over Bharatkhand and Turvasa's descendants came the Andhras, Pandyas, cholas and cheras. If so being the case then Ikshvaku dynasty have started much prior to that according to my knowledge. Looking forward for your explanations on my doubts. <br />With regards...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12596465642424059493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-22293273721723372972019-10-13T19:01:42.695+05:302019-10-13T19:01:42.695+05:30A paperbck edition is going to be published only o...A paperbck edition is going to be published only on Mahabharata dating. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-8882152655242606232019-10-11T02:57:10.193+05:302019-10-11T02:57:10.193+05:30Good work to handle Nilesh Oak's dating. Astro...Good work to handle Nilesh Oak's dating. Astronomically his was a bogus claim. Now you gave an alternative theory too. <br /><br />May be you should now write separate books on the dating of Mahabharata and Ramayana. Dr. Vartak could have got a date for Ramayana within the Dwapara yuga if he would not have used some wrong figures. <br />Sunil K. Bhattacharjyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311674759297199401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-65495483981941914622019-10-10T16:04:16.512+05:302019-10-10T16:04:16.512+05:30Dear all,
My book critiquing the 'Epoch of A...Dear all, <br /><br />My book critiquing the 'Epoch of Arundhati' of Nilesh Nilkanth Oak is published in Kindle Unlimited. Readers may check out my blog here for details.<br /> <br />http://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2019/10/my-book-myth-of-epoch-of-arundhati-of.html<br /><br />There are 13 chapters in all and 2 appendices. <br /><br />Of the 13 chapters, the 1st deals with the symbolism of Arundhati and why she could not have transgressed her limits anytime in the past. If she had, the rishis would have dropped her from the symbolism and replaced her with some other star as they did for the run-away wives of 6 of the sapta rishis whom they substituted with the six krittika stars. <br /><br />From 2nd to 10th chapter it was an exposition of the errors and defects in Nilesh Oak's book, in his interpretation etc. <br /><br />But dont miss the 4th chapter which is an exposition of equinoxes and solstices. I will be publishing the salient parts of this chapter in academia.edu soon to aid the researchers on equinoxes. Everyday I get to see anywhere between 40 to 100 reads mainly from Russia for my old two blogs on equinoxes of the Vedic way. I am sure someone is working mathematically on establishing the concept I have revealed from Surya Siddhanta. This chapter in the book is further elaboration of the concept in a logical way which some of the astrodynamicists from a global leading manufacturer of computer codes have agreed with in principle. So don't miss out this chapter which also reveals the limitations of the astronomy software used by Nilesh oak for dating an ancient event. <br /><br />The 11th chapter deals with what is wrong with Nilesh Oak's interpretation of Arundhati walking ahead of Vasishtha. It dismantles the so called 'Epoch' of Arundhati. It also establishes that Arundhati observation by Vyasa was not an astronomy observation but a scientific observation caused by changed atmospheric refraction index. It is here you will find a surprise event that forms the basis of further research scientifically. <br /><br />In the 12th chapter I have established the traditional date of Mahabharata events by both pancanga features and astronomy observations. I owe to Vrihannala for driving me through this chapter by granting me the inner eye to see through the events. <br /><br />The 13th chapter deals with the Fall of Abhijit and how it was at that time the first ever Vedic Homa was initiated, hold your breath, by none other than the so-called Tamil God Muruga!! More interesting discoveries can be read in this chapter. <br /><br />Then comes Appendix I detailing the manipulations done by Nilesh Oak to 'corroborate' his date. You will be surprised to know that he had not corroborated any major event of Mahabharata which he himself admits in the book. The so-called 'alignments' he cites are all manipulated by him. There is no basis for the claim he makes in the social media that he had corroborated 500 + or 1000 + references. <br /> <br />Appendix II 2nd gives the mathematical derivation for determining the relative rise and set of the stars and calculation of the same for Arundhati and Vasishtha for the said Epoch.<br /><br />The book is available in Kindle Unlimited <br /><br /><br />https://www.amazon.in/dp/B07YVFNQLD/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_U_x_unuNDbFWYGMVS%20via%20@amazonIN (India)<br /><br />https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07YVFNQLD/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_U_x_DnuNDbBRDTFVM%20via%20@amazon (US)<br /><br />https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07YVFNQLD/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_U_x_MnuNDbKKE32J0%20via%20@AmazonUK (UK)<br /><br />I owe my gratitude to a top Indologist for consenting to read the manuscript, and giving absolute concurrence with what I have written. Knowing the kind of unleash that Nilesh Oak is expected to do - he had started already and in pseudo names which he thinks people cannot detect - I accepted to maintain the anonymity of the well respected Indologist. But days are not far off for Nilesh Oak's naive theories to lose takers. Jayasree Saranathan https://www.blogger.com/profile/01048252011566427834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-44864368653091187212019-10-10T02:08:08.720+05:302019-10-10T02:08:08.720+05:30Dear Jayasreeji,
It is good to know that your E-b...Dear Jayasreeji,<br /><br />It is good to know that your E-book "MYTH OF ‘THE EPOCH OF ARUNDHATI’ OF NILESH NILKANTH OAK", Kindle Edition is out. You must have spent quite a lot of time and energy on this 440 page book. Why not publish it in other formats? Personally I prefer to read only the hard copies of books. You can call this as the habit of the old-timers. <br /><br />Regards,<br />Sunil K. Bhattacharjya<br /><br /><br />Sunil K. Bhattacharjyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311674759297199401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-13263886012593901822019-10-02T21:54:17.932+05:302019-10-02T21:54:17.932+05:30Dear friends,
I have told you earlier that I told...Dear friends,<br /><br />I have told you earlier that I told Shri Nilesh Oak that his imagination that Bhishma lied on the bed of arrows for 92 is wrong, as it was just wild imagination to suit a date in 5561 BCE. Bhishma himself said that he spent 58 nights on the bed of arrows (and surely not a single night more). <br /><br /><br />Further, Bhishma fell in the war in the first half of the month of Margashisrsha and at the end of the 58 nights on the bed of arrows, he passed away in the first half of Magha. Nobody can change that. From the ancient times the Indians have observed the Bhishmashtami in Magha. <br /><br />Now let us wait for Jayasreeji's book, which should appear soon. <br /><br />Sunil K. Bhattacharjya<br /><br />Sunil K. Bhattacharjyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311674759297199401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-41791838497127620432019-09-26T00:19:53.743+05:302019-09-26T00:19:53.743+05:30Dear Jayasreeji,
leanJedi(i.e.,Nilesh Oak) writes...Dear Jayasreeji,<br /><br />leanJedi(i.e.,Nilesh Oak) writes :Please share the links to your publications. I am very curious to read them. Thanks. <br /><br />The simple thing that the apparent direction of movement of Arundhati and Vasistha has to be opposite to the direction of the earth's movement is beyond his understanding. <br /><br />Nilesh Oak's own friend, Siddharth Chhabra told us that Dieter Koch has already refuted Nilesh Oak's claim of the 5561 BCE date for the Mahabharata war. <br /><br />It is a pity that people like Dr. P.V.Vartak and Nilesh Oak, have been unaware as to when, according to our ancient texts, the Kali yuga started and that the Mahabharata war took place in the fag end of the Dwapara yuga.<br /><br />Regards,<br />SKB <br /><br /> <br /><br /> Sunil K. Bhattacharjyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311674759297199401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-66778724300104098682019-09-17T09:45:17.965+05:302019-09-17T09:45:17.965+05:30Dear friends,
Nilesh Oak is showing his true colo...Dear friends,<br /><br />Nilesh Oak is showing his true colours. He wrote the following mail (quoted below) and I am giving my reply below his mail. Nilesh Oak could not understand the simplest thing that the apparent motion of the Arundhati-Vasistha is in a circle parallel to the Earth's Precessional circe and that the movement of Arundhati and Vasistha has to be in direction opposite to the direction of Earth's precessional movement. His knowledge of astronomy is nothing but superficial. <br /><br />Further, I told him that Vedavyasa mentioed about the 13-day eclipse pair in the Mahabharata and this is an acid test for him. Nilesh Oak has run away from that, because he cannot show any 13-day eclipse pair in 5561 BCE.<br /><br />SKB<br /><br /><br />Nilesh Oak's mail<br /><br />LeanJedi<br />September 16,2019 at 8:27 pm<br /><br />Dear. Dr. S Bhattacharjya,<br />Please elaborate to the full extent. This is indeed entertaining and in a way, educational. You indeed represent a significant portion of so-called educated, Ph.D. holding community of India which are and were wasting many valuable resources of India. Of course, your behavior is also a blot to the others who worked day and night for the glorification of India, against all odds.<br />Thank you for making the inner mind of fake Indic intellectuals available to posterity.<br />Warm regards,<br /><br />My reply to Nilesh Oak<br />Dear Mr. Oak,<br />Why be vague and escapist? Give concrete proofs if there is any lapse on my part. I am not egoist like you and I have no interest in earning money by publishing books like you only to fool people. If you can why don't you give reason why and how Arundhalti separate from Vasistha at different times. Just giving the statement that the RAs of these two stars are different at different times does not explain how and why the RA figures become become different. <br /><br />SKBSunil K. Bhattacharjyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311674759297199401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3442555339667770589.post-6187250022892477382019-09-16T23:31:32.563+05:302019-09-16T23:31:32.563+05:30Dear friends,
Nilesh oak is asking who is holding...Dear friends,<br /><br />Nilesh oak is asking who is holding him guilty. I wrote to him as follows:<br /><br />Let me elaborate it to some extent. Please read my mail, where I said that you have made the mistake of supporting the 5561 BCE date of Mahabharata War, proposed by Late Dr. P.V.Vartak, because you did not know about the role of the extremely slow apparent movement of Arundhati and Vasistha, in the direction opposite to the precessional movement of the Earth. which caused the apparent separation of Arundhati and Vasistha, where Arundhati"s going ahead of Vasistha became noticeable to naked eye only about a millennium after after 4636 BCE. <br />Sunil K. Bhattacharjyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311674759297199401noreply@blogger.com