"This systematic destruction of India's internal security apparatus is not only for vote-bank politics as most commentators are suggesting. Of course the Modi-phobia is a factor but not the sole reason.It has a larger dimension which is evident from the nervousness displayed by the dispensation with regard to ISI, Hafiz Saeed and David Headley. Do they know too much? Were they used to stage 26/11 to counter Jehadi terror by creating the specter of 'Hindu Terror'? How does David Headley have the gumption to abuse Indian interrogators? Are the services of the ISI and LeT being obtained to influence vote-bank politics? Is the LeT and the ISI asking too much in return? These are questions which readers must ponder upon."
"Ishrat Jahan and her associates were nothing but tools of proxy war by Pakistan. Anybody with a modicum of understanding of terrorism will understand that the role of Ishrat was to act as suicide-bomber, as revealed by David Headley. There are any number of such modules waiting to strike. Rajiv Gandhi too was eliminated by eliciting the services of one such suicide bomber through the aegis of LTTE. This could not have happened without unsuspecting facilitators within." Read more...
The Sunday Guardian claims that it is in possession of the NIA note that mentioned Ishrat as an operative of LeT. Headley did mention Ishrat' name and her terror links:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sunday-guardian.com/news/nia-note-claimed-ishrat-was-with-let
What they say is even if Ishrat was involved in terrorist activities, no one can kill her. That is because she wanted to kill Narendra Modi. Had it been Sonia Gandhi, her whole family would have been encountered.
ReplyDeleteGood point Ms Aishu.
ReplyDeleteAnother from First post:-
http://www.firstpost.com/india/ishrat-jahan-and-the-ethics-of-indias-encounter-policies-929121.html