Dr Kalam’s interest in Carnatic music is
well known.
His proficiency to play Veena and his specific interest in the song
"Endaro
Mahanubhavulu" would be known to many
by now. This song is cast in raga Sreeragam. He must have been elated when
he came to know that this was the favorite raga of Smt M.S.Subbulakshmi
also. The occasion was the ceremony of receiving Bharat Ratna.
Both Dr
Kalam and M.S. Subbulakshmi received Bharat Ratna at the same ceremony. I very
well remember the photo of Dr Kalam speaking to M.S. at the Bharat Ratna
ceremony. From the narration of
Dr Vidyasagar , a colleague of Dr
Kalam, I came to know that Dr Kalam had asked M.S. Amma on that occasion what
her favorite raga was and she had replied it was Sreeragam. On that occasion Dr
Kalam had even touched
the feet of M.S. Amma as a Vandanam
to that great Athman. These two remind
me as the examples of “Hree” and “Lakshmi” expressed in "Hreescha te Lakshmischa Patnau"[i] of
Purusha Sookhtham.
On the occasion of the final journey of
Dr Kalam, I heard in the Podhigai TV, the great Musician Sri T.N. Seshagopalan revealing a song that Dr Kalam
liked very much. Dr Kalam attended a concert of Sri TNS at Bangalore on which
occasion he had expressed his admiration for the song "Neene
Doddavano". It was a newly
released record of Sri TNS, say, a year
before that time. It was not a widely known song as “Endaro Mahanubhavulu”.
Unless Dr Kalam was a regular listener of music of many doyens in the field, he
could not have expressed his prior knowledge of that song and admiration for
the same.
Sri TNS was surprised to know that Dr
Kalam had known that song and its meaning – without knowing which it is not possible
to appreciate that song. On hearing this, I was even more surprised because the
meaning of that song was such that any scientist in the West could not have
appreciated it. It was because Dr Kalam was imbibed with ‘civilisational
values’ of our country and also a Hindu in thought due to logical temper, he
could sense the “mind of God” in that song which
even an Einstein could not grasp!
In this context it would do well to
compare Einstein with Dr Kalam.
Both of them worked on destructive
missile power. Both of them knew the value of human life that is threatened by
that missile power. Both of them loved peace, but Dr Kalam did not consider peace
as anathema to missile strength. He had rightly understood the civilisational
message of the importance of Kshatriya activities. The core of the message was
to be battle-prepared at all times and be expansionist. But there was a rule in
that too - that expansionism did not go in the anti-clockwise direction.
The kings of different regions of ancient
land of Bharat went round in clockwise direction. They started from east or
south and went round clock-wise in succeeding directions. Muchukuntha and Raghu
did so in their Digvijaya. Similarly in the Prashasthi of the
inscriptions of Chola kings, the victories are
mentioned in clock-wise directions. In this order, expeditions to North West
and beyond had no place. Expeditions had not gone beyond river Saraswathi or
Indus in times of yore. But the movement of people and expansionism had taken
place in the east. That is how throughout the East, Hinduism had spread in its
glory. West and North West were meant for exile as it is in the left side – Ida
– Parsva. Since our ancients considered Bharat as the holiest of the holy places
(Bheeshma Parva – chapter 9), they went round and round in this land and
tried to bring the entire land under their control. Military prowess was given
topmost priority so that others would not disturb them or they could bring others
under them so that peace could be ensured.
Taking cue from this, Dr Kalam did not
subscribe to Ashokan compromise on militariness.
Instead he wanted military power as a necessity for peace. I don’t think
Einstein had that much clarity on weaponisation. Dr Kalam clearly had a
civilisational advantage and he grasped it right.
Both Kalam and Einstein were drawn to
politics. While Einstein was not so popular in politics, Kalam became popular
with the people but not as much with a section of politicians who were
threatened by his uprightness.
Both of them talked about God. Einstein
was drawn to the religion of his birth but his stance was not well received.
But Dr Kalam’s inquiry was that of true Seeker and no wonder he found himself
in God-synchronous orbit being put over there against the gravitational pull of
identity issues of birth, by his
Guru Pramukh Swamiji some 15 years ago.
He
readily accepted the Swamiji’s suggestion of adding ‘faith in God’ as the
6th idea to transform India in 'Vision 2020'. I don’t know how many
scientists would have agreed to that. But Dr Kalam perceived it as the 6th
sense and that is where we can read his mind.
The 6th sense is something special
to human beings. The world and the entire Universe that these two scientists
were fascinated about are made up of just 5 elements (pancha bhootha) and the
essence of the 5 elements. Even our body is made up of these 5 elements. But to
activate it, we need an Athman. Only that Athman adds the 6th sense.
For the activation of the body of 5 senses, an Athman is needed. When the Athman is absent, the human body of 5 elements is dead. In the same
logic, for the activation of the Universe of huge conglomeration of 5 elements,
a Great Athman is needed.
Athman is the Kshetrajan for the body
which is the Kshetra. The knowledge that is developed when thinking about “Janma Mrithyu Jaraa, Vyadhi, Dhukha dosha” (BG
13-8, Kshetra- Kshetrajna Vipaka yoga) is what makes up the 6th
sense. That 6th sense extends the same logic to the Universe of 5
elements that there must be a Great Athman to activate the Huge Universe. The
Universe is still active and not dead. As it keeps expanding, there must an
activating Athman in that. Since we the human beings are also part of the growing
Universe, we are also being activated by that Great Athman.
In such a scenario, the Great Athman cannot
lie outside the system of Universe (because activation is still continuing). Einstein
believed in the existence of a Creator but did not find Him to be necessary for
the Universe once it has been activated. But going by the logic of our body being
activated by the Athman, the permeation of the Great Athman or the Paramathman throughout
Creation and also in interaction with us (the numerous Athmans) sounds tenable.
The constant interaction with the Paramathman must be there by virtue of It
being the activating force of the human existence of the Universe. The ultimate
6th sense must tell man that He (Paramathman) is his Kshetrajan.
The kind of equation between the Paramathman
and the Athman is more logically understood only in our Sanatana Dharma. As a
product of this land, Dr Kalam was able to appreciate a lesser known song “Neene Doddavano, Ninna Dasaru Doddavaro?” The composer
of this song, Sage Purandsaradasa asks whether God is great or his devotees are
great.
He goes on analyzing this question by the instances of how God heeded
his devotee’s voice and appeared as Lion to save him. Does this not show that
God is great?
At the same time is it not also true
that the devotee is great by having pulled God to rush to his rescue? So who is
great, God or his devotee?
Similarly God had responded to the wails
of Draupadi. It is not just to human beings; God has heeded to the cries of even
an elephant. This quality of God is also expressed by Meera bhai in "Hari
tuma" song. The same idea is repeated in diverse ways by Azhwars in many verses of Nalayira
Divya Prabhandam.
Here a question arises - why should the
Great Activating Force, the Paramathman create these kinds of sufferings and
allow the Athmans to wail? Keeping aside
the more mundane and better known ideas of karma, samsara, gunas, vasanas etc,
let me look into the core question of why the Paramathman created the universe
at all.
It was because It wanted to play! This
may sound alarming, but scriptures say that Creation is a play for Him. Brahma Sutra says, “
Lokavanthu, leelaa kaivalyam”. (Brahma
Sutra – 2-1-33) It means “Its (Brahman’s creative activity) is mere pastime
as is seen in the world”. The clue is ‘as is seen in the world”. So what is seen in the world? To know that let's start from the beginning!
In the beginning there was Brahman.
Brahman is Brihat – huge and keeps growing.
Brahman is Brihat – huge and keeps growing.
Why did it grow in the first place?
Because without growth or before it
started growing, It existed as an embodiment of all faculties and everything.
It could see but it did not have an agent or an organ to see. It could hear but
It did not have an organ to hear. Like this, It was capable of everything but
could not actually exhibit anything. (It is like how we have the urge to express
ourselves. That is a quality we have bequeathed from Brahman!). So It thought, “May
I become many” and It became many. That is how creation began. In such
scenario, Brahman (God) is not deviated from the created worlds or the “many”
It became. In other words, It is in us as we are also part of the Many!
But we lost memory of It. That is where
It has to somehow ‘bring us around’ towards It and make us eligible to be like
That sometime or the other. That is why Nammazhwar said, “Vaikuntham puguvathu mannavar vidhiye” (All people are
destined to enter Vaikuntham) (Thiruvaimozhi – 10-9-9).
This is like a play that we ourselves have
played as kids. Imagine a kid – alone and having no one for company to play.
What the kid will do? It will have the toys of a boy or a girl or an animal or anything
that it has and make scenes of play by making someone hit or cry or laugh or
succeed.
All these we are witnessing in the
world. In all these we gain something in our 6th sense, and develop
better understanding of how to play our parts.
So who is great in this equation, is it
we?
We are like the toys that the kid is
playing and we start enacting our role on our own (or we think so?).
Will the kid become more excited about
it? Or the toy becomes more excited?
Will the kid try to outsmart the toy or the
toy try to grab whatever it can to outsmart the moves of the kid?
This is the essence of "neene doddavano" (Is God great?) or "ninna dasaru doddavaro?" (Are devotees great?). The calls and wails for God from the devotees and the replies from God which these devotees can hear is what is meant by "as is seen in the world" that Brahma Sutra says. This interaction having dramatic elements of suffering and happiness, competition and excellence of one over the other makes it look like a play from a bird's eye view.
In essence, everything seems to be a play – but that was originally started by the Kid, here the Paramathman. The kid enjoys the play as it has no one else but only its toys to play with.
In essence, everything seems to be a play – but that was originally started by the Kid, here the Paramathman. The kid enjoys the play as it has no one else but only its toys to play with.
Is the Kid (God) being cruel to the toys – in this
context, we, the Athmans?
Brahma Sutra further addresses this
question and gives answers.
But here – for the current topic, I
think the song and the purport of God’s play behind it is something that no
scientist can perceive or appreciate.
The same cannot be said of Dr Kalam.
His liking for the Neene Doddavaro song
shows that he is indeed steeped into Vedanta, the source of the 6th
sense!
[i] From
Purusha Sookhtham:-
hreeshca te lakshmeeshca patnyau | ahorAtre pArshve
|
nakshatrANi roopam | ashvinau vyAttam |
iSHTam maniSHANa |
amum maniSHANa |
sarvam maniSHANA ||
(hreeshca) Hree and (lakshmishca) Laskhmi are (patnyau) wives (te)
to you. (aho - rAtre) The day and the night (pArshve) your sides.
(nakshatrANi) the Stars (roopam) your brilliant form. (ashvinau)
the Healing Ashvins (vyAttam) your mouth
HrI is the Goddess that grants Modesty ( a reference to second stanza
of Sixteenth Chapter of Gita also shows this Hri as meaning modesty.
(ahimsaa satyam akrodhas
tyaagah saanthir apaisunam
dayaa bhuutesu aloeluptvam
maardavam hrir acaapalam)
And Lakshmi who grants Wealth. ( hreer-lajjAbhimAninee devata ,
lakshmee- raishvayAbhimAninee devatA – Commentary by SayanA) The Day and the
Night are even such opposites. Sriman Narayana is the conciliation of
all such opposites, even as Sesha, the snake, and garuda, the eagle,
worshipping him together signify. He is brilliant as the stars, and
healing comes from him.
nakshatrANi roopam | ashvinau vyAttam |
iSHTam maniSHANa |
amum maniSHANa |
sarvam maniSHANA ||
(hreeshca) Hree and (lakshmishca) Laskhmi are (patnyau) wives (te)
to you. (aho - rAtre) The day and the night (pArshve) your sides.
(nakshatrANi) the Stars (roopam) your brilliant form. (ashvinau)
the Healing Ashvins (vyAttam) your mouth
HrI is the Goddess that grants Modesty ( a reference to second stanza
of Sixteenth Chapter of Gita also shows this Hri as meaning modesty.
(ahimsaa satyam akrodhas
tyaagah saanthir apaisunam
dayaa bhuutesu aloeluptvam
maardavam hrir acaapalam)
And Lakshmi who grants Wealth. ( hreer-lajjAbhimAninee devata ,
lakshmee- raishvayAbhimAninee devatA – Commentary by SayanA) The Day and the
Night are even such opposites. Sriman Narayana is the conciliation of
all such opposites, even as Sesha, the snake, and garuda, the eagle,
worshipping him together signify. He is brilliant as the stars, and
healing comes from him.
Respected Madam,
ReplyDeleteNice to see you back in full form. GODSPEED.
Pranams
Skandan
JayaSree Mam,
ReplyDelete" Is the Kid (God) being cruel to the toys – in this context, we, the Athmans? " - The answer is still missing in the post. May we expect some explanation for our sake?
# Thanks Mr Skandan.
ReplyDelete# I will write as an article Mr krsna.
Madam JS
ReplyDeleteExcellent and Thought Provoking.
The following two portions in your post are outstanding and they indeed impacted me.
1)This may sound alarming, but scriptures say that Creation is a play for Him. Brahma Sutra says, “ Lokavanthu, leelaa kaivalyam”. (Brahma Sutra – 2-1-33) It means “Its (Brahman’s creative activity) is mere pastime as is seen in the world”. The clue is ‘as is seen in the world”. So what is seen in the world? To know that let's start from the beginning!
2)The kid enjoys the play as it has no one else but only its toys to play with. Is the Kid (God) being cruel to the toys – in this context, we, the Athmans?
I am reminded of Shakespeare’s King Lear … “As flies to wanton boys, are we to Gods, they kill us for their sport?”
Well. When we believe that we are the makers of our lives and we only can run the lives as we do, we pass on the blame to GOD when things goes wrong…as above…... This normally happens with all of us.
But once we accept, agree that all our happiness, sufferings are the result of Leela Kaivalyam of our Kid GOD, we will feel such happenings are only momentary.
A comparison could be drawn to the way we feel when we actually bring up our kids– feel extremely happy when the child does something new and equally unhappy when the child falls sick or gets wounded and affected or does not listen to us. We accept the reality that in the growth of our child such things are normal happenings.
Ultimately everything will be fair in life.
It is difficult but better to learn to live with our lives and this reality – that we are toys in the play room of our GOD.