Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Did Alexander defeat Porus?



Controversial though this post may seem,

there are certain facts which can not be dismissed,

that run contrary to the prevalent opinion that

Alexander defeated Porus (King Puru).

Alexander in his bid to conquer the entire world came to India

and defeated the Indian ruler Porus,

so says our history text books.

But it is not so.

This is coming to be known

as we go deeper into the issue of what happened then.




Megasthanes who came to India after the so-called invasion by Alexander

has recorded that this country (India) was one

which was never invaded by any and

which never invaded any.

If Alexander’s victory had been true,

why did this historian from Greece write like this?




It had also been recorded in the famous medieval epic,

Shahnameh by the Persian poet Firdausi that

Alexander was defeated by Porus and

they became friends.

The territories conquered earlier by Alexander were left to Porus.

Why should Alexander,

known for his conquering ambitions leave them to Porus

if not defeated by him?




“Alexander himself was a myth which was promoted

by the British some 150 years ago. All our ancestors had no idea of Alexander

or his invasion of India.

Alexander myth was necessary for the British

to justify the colonial domination” – says Mr. GP. Srinivasan




Prof Rao has taken up this issue and revealed

how this story of Alexander’s invasion of India

has no basis in contemporary writings of his times

and also from Indian works.




Looking from the available records in Jyothish books too,

it is seen that no battle scuffles had taken place

in the period between 4th to 1 st century BC.


An important source of astrology of the Yavanas (Greeks) is

Varahamihira’s Pancha Siddhanthika.

This Siddhanthika was based on Romaka Sidhantha

and Paulisa Sishantha

(among the 5 siddhanthas of this book by Varahamihira)

which have been written by a Roman and a Greek respectively.


The Yavanas had been frequent visitors to India

in the 400 years before the Christian era,

and there had been exchange of views in astrology and astronomy

between Indian rishis and the yavanas.

Such exchange can not have happened in an oppressed atmosphere of invasion.

The Indian authors of astrology had talked

about the yavanas, their roots and their contribution in good length.

But there is no mention of any invasion.




Meena Raja’s “Vriddha yavana Jataka”

is an important book dealing with the astrology of the yavanas.

This was written in the 4th century BC in the opinion of David Pingree,

based on the details in the book.

There are others too like, Varahamihira, Bhattotpala and Kalyana varma

who have written about Yavanas and their contributions.

From their writings it appears that

there had been a free movement of scholars between Greece and India.

No where is a mention of one country on a military expedition on the other.




It has been observed by scholars that Alexander did not reach India proper

though he thought that he had reached India.

The river he was said to have reached was not the Indus, but the Nile (Nil)

as he was said to have sighted crocodiles in that river.

More details in the following links containing the research findings of Prof Rao.


http://www.hinduwebsite.com/history/research/alexandermyth.asp

http://www.hinduwebsite.com/history/alexander.asp