Showing posts with label Through the window of Tamil.... Show all posts
Showing posts with label Through the window of Tamil.... Show all posts

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

The Middle Chola Timeline requires revision

The Middle Chola timeline requires revision due to a fundamental flaw in its construction. Historians have traditionally calculated the reign of each king from the death year of the preceding king, overlooking the overlap of regnal years between consecutive kings. In reality, each king's reign began after the death of the predecessor king's predecessor, indicating parallel rulership.

Key evidence includes: - Rajaraja I's regnal years starting after Aditya II's death, not Madhurantaka's (Uttama Chola). - An inscription in the Big Temple revealing Rajendra I's 3rd year coinciding with Rajaraja's 29th year, indicating overlapping reigns. Two inscriptions of Rajendra I found in Nanjangud with complete panchanga details help determine his reign, which in turn reveals Rajaraja's first and last years. Notably, Rajaraja's inscriptions lack necessary panchanga features for dating, and some are corrupted. The missing kings are also identified by listing down Parakesari - Rajakesari titles. The findings: - Rajaraja I's reign began in 976-977 CE, not 985 CE. - The Big Temple's 1000-year completion was in 2001, not 2010. - Gangai Konda Cholapuram Temple's 1000-year completion was in 2013-14, not 2025. This article is an excerpt from my book "Who Killed Aditya Karikala?" (available in Tamil and English) and can be obtained via email at jayasreebooks@gmail.com The article can be read at https://www.vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=7322

Some excerpts:














Sunday, August 17, 2025

The Maritime Legacy of the Cholas: A Thousand-Year Celebration (My article in Vijayvaani)

 The Chola dynasty’s legacy was commemorated in July 2025 through the Aadi Thiruvathirai Festival at Gangaikonda Cholapuram temple in Tamil Nadu, highlighting Rajendra Chola I’s historic conquests in Southeast Asia. Prime Minister Narendra Modi attended the event, releasing a commemorative Rs 1000 coin to honour the emperor’s maritime achievements. This grand celebration sparked renewed interest in Chola history and their pioneering contributions to naval supremacy, showcasing their maritime prowess long before Western countries established their own naval dominance.

The Origins of the Cholas

The Chola dynasty’s history can be broadly categorized into two distinct periods: the ancient Cholas, known through Sangam literature, and the medieval Cholas, who rose to prominence with Vijayalaya Chola in the 9th century. Inscriptions, such as the Tiruvalangadu copper plates, provide valuable insights into the Chola lineage.

According to these plates, Rajendra Chola traces his ancestry to Cholavarman, said to be born to Bharata, son of Dushyanta. A close examination of these origin stories and lineages mentioned in the Vishnu Purana suggests that the Cholas may have indeed descended from Bharata, sharing a common ancestor with Sibi and Rama, potentially dating back around 7,000 years.

Locational Advantage in Seafaring

The Cholas’ marine supremacy likely began with the first Chola who settled in Poompuhar. Pattinap Palai, the Tamil Sangam text mentions trade with Elam (Sri Lanka) and Kadaram. A notable verse from Purananuru (66) highlights Karikal Chola’s mastery of navigation, leveraging wind currents to his advantage. The Cholas’ strategic location along the Coromandel Coast facilitated their dominance over key Indian Ocean trade routes, setting the stage for their later maritime achievements.

Naval Expeditions

While early Cholas like Manu Neeti Chola were said to have crossed the sea for military expeditions to Ceylon (modern day Sri Lanka), it was Rajaraja Chola I who achieved substantial success in naval warfare, conquering Ceylon. However, his son Rajendra Chola I took the Chola Empire’s naval power to new heights by crossing the Bay of Bengal to reach the Malay Peninsula, scoring a victory in his 14th regnal year and bringing Kadaram (modern-day Kedah) under his control.

The Tanjore inscription, found in the Brihadeeswara temple and inscribed in Rajendra Chola’s 19th regnal year, provides a detailed account of his conquests in Southeast Asia in a particular order, perhaps indicating the route of his movement into the region. According to the inscription, Rajendra Chola defeated Sangrama Vijayotthunga, the king of Kadaram, and captured his wealth, including the “Vidyadhara Torana” and a gem-studded double door. This shows that he entered through the Malacca Strait.

The inscription reveals subsequent targets in Sumatra, detailing Rajendra Chola’s campaign: he first attacked Srivijaya (likely Palembang, the capital city), then proceeded northward to capture Pannai and Malaiyur. His conquests extended to the Malay Peninsula, encompassing territories such as Maayirudinga, Langasoha, Pappaalam, Limbika, Valaipandhoor, Takkola, and Mathamaalinga. Additionally, he seized Lamuri in northern Sumatra and Nakkavaram (Nicobar). Notably, Rajendra Chola achieved these victories in a single expedition, demonstrating his remarkable military prowess and strategic brilliance.

Causes for the military attack

Rajendra Chola’s attack on Srivijaya was a lightning strike that left a lasting impact, crippling the kingdom for centuries. This attack is intriguing, given the long-standing trade connections between the Cholas and Srivijaya, dating back to the 2nd century CE. During Rajaraja Chola I’s reign, the Sailendra dynasty ruler of Srivijaya built the Chudamani Vihara, a Buddhist monastery, in Nagappatinam with Rajaraja’s support. However, within years, Rajendra Chola launched a surprise attack on Srivijaya.

Recent research by Tansen Sen, Associate Professor of Asian History and Religions at the City University of New York, sheds new light on the strained relations between the Cholas and Srivijaya. According to Sen’s analysis of Chinese chronicles, geopolitics coupled with trade interests appear to have played a role in triggering hostilities.

The Srivijaya kingdom’s strategic location controlled the Malacca Strait between the Malay Peninsula and Sumatra, as well as the Sunda Strait between Sumatra and Java, making it a crucial hub for maritime trade, particularly with China during the Song dynasty. The Chola kingdom’s trade guilds, including the Ainnururvar, Manimangalam, and Ayyavole, sought to expand their trade opportunities in China. However, according to Chinese chronicles cited by Tansen Sen, the Song Court denied them trading rights, citing that the Chola kingdom was “subject to Srivijaya.” (Tansen Sen, “Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of Sino-Indian Relations,” (2003), p. 224).

This denial of trading rights likely occurred towards the end of Rajaraja Chola’s reign and was reported to Rajendra Chola, who saw it as a challenge to Chola power. It appears that Srivijaya’s establishment of the Buddhist Vihara in Nagappatinam might have created a false impression of Chola subservience, leading the Song rulers to deny trading rights to Chola merchants. It is also opined that Srivijaya deliberately created an impression of supremacy over the Cholas which led to severe backlash by Rajendra Chola.

Rajendra Chola’s diplomatic relations with the Khmer Empire (Kamboja) played a strategic role in his naval expedition to Srivijaya. It is believed that Rajendra Chola timed his attack on Srivijaya to coincide with the Khmer Empire’s assault on Tambralinga (southern Thailand), a region aligned with Srivijaya.

Rajendra I’s grandson, born to Rajendra II, seemed to have played a crucial role in the naval expedition, as known from the title given to him as “Kadaram Kondan” (one who conquered Kadaram). However, challenges persisted, and Rajendra I’s son Veera Rajendra had to intervene with a naval force to Kadaram during his reign. However, during Kulottunga’s reign, emissaries from Kadaram visited, seeking aid thereby reflecting subsidiary status of Kadaram under the Cholas.  

Similar to the Telugu Cholas in Andhra Pradesh, who claimed ancestry from Karikal Chola, there seemed to have existed Malay Cholas tracing their origin to Rajendra Chola’s lineage. Malay chronicles mention kings with the name “Raja Chula,” lending credence to this theory. Further study of these chronicles may reveal more about the Chola Empire’s interactions with Southeast Asia.

Winning Maldives and Lanka

Rajendra Chola’s naval force extended his empire’s reach beyond South East Asia. He brought the Maldives archipelago under his control and exerted influence over Sri Lanka (Elam), capturing Polonnaruwa and constructing the “Vaanavan Madevi Eshwaram” temple, now known as ‘Shivale’, in memory of his mother, Vaanavan Madevi.

Parashurama’s crown

Another remarkable achievement was capturing the legendary crown crafted by Parashurama, a treasure from the Ramayana era. This crown was forged from the melted crowns of 21 defeated kings and stored on the island of “Sandima Dweepa”, one of 77 islands west of Tulu Nadu, according to the ...... Click here to read the rest of the article

Friday, August 8, 2025

Rajendra Chola's maritime legacy (My article in Organiser)

 My article in the Organiser magazine explores the maritime legacy of the Cholas, particularly focusing on the reasons behind Rajendra Chola's strategic attack on Srivijaya, a previously friendly country. The article also highlights Rajendra Chola's enduring spiritual legacy and his contributions to water management, showcasing his multifaceted impact on the region and Sanatan religion.

The online link is here: The Chola legacy: Acknowledging maritime prowess of Great Kingdom

Pages from the Print edition can be read below: 



                                                                                 



Wednesday, March 19, 2025

My talk on the "Bharathiar song I like most" in Bharathi Muththamizh Sangam, Texas

 On 14th December 2024, I gave a speech in connection with the celebration of Bharathiyar Week conducted by "Bharathi Mutthamizh Sangam' (பாரதி முத்தமிழ்ச் சங்கம்) of San Antanio, Texas. 

The topic was about the song of Bharathiyar I like most. That song contains basic features for how to shape one's thought, word and action. The recording is given in this video.



Saturday, November 9, 2024

Feedback from Advocate Ravi Rajagopalan on my book "Who killed Aditya Karikala"

I am sharing the feedback of Advocate Ravi Rajagopalan about my historical research book "Who Killed Aditya Karikala".

While expressing my sincere gratitude for his appreciation of my work, I am thrilled to know that it has resonated with him from his professional point of view. Such kind of feedback fuels my passion for research into historical conundrums of the past. Many thanks to him.

***


2nd degree connection
Independent Practicing Advocate | Counsel, Ravi Rajagopalan Associates | Foreign Lawyer at Marsans Gitlin Baker UK
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 


Trivia: The Cholas did not adhere to the rule of agnatic primogeniture in their succession protocol- they adopted co-regency and selected the most accomplished, as the co-ruler from amongst the male descendants by applying the law of tanistry

I am making this post not to discuss the movie "Ponniyin Selvan" but to point out how historians wrongly applied the imperial succession rules and got the entire line of Chola Kings and their regnal years wrong. The great chroniclers and historians of the Chola history, from the last century, namely Prof Nilakanta Sastri and Sadasiva Pandarathar completely overlooked two aspects:

1.     There was no single King. There were 2 royals at the same point who ruled with equal powers, in what is called as Co-Regency.
2.     If one of them died the surviving Regent appointed another one.
3.     The selection was from the available males in the ruling clan and the person chosen was not necessarily the first born or the senior most. It was a person who in the opinion of the ruling family was most valorous and competent to preserve, protect and defend the dominion/ kingdom.

In essence the historians of the last century while putting the genealogy, the line of succession of Chola kings and their regnal years, completely overlooked these two aspects – namely one of co-regency and the other being adoption of tanistry in contrast the rule of agnatic primogeniture. So, they got the regnal years all wrong because they simply presumed that the eldest always succeeded and there was only one sovereign at any point in time.

Thus, for example Aditya Karikala who was also called as Parthivendra Varman (remember that his brother Raja Raja was Arulmozhi Varman) was an actual reigning sovereign co-regent and ruled as a King between 961-976 CE and he anointed Uttama Chola as a co-regent after his father Sundara Chola died. Popular versions and even in the film "Ponniyin Selvan", Aditya Karikala is depicted only as a Crown Prince and he died even before his father Sundara Chola, in the year 969AD.

Now this eye-popping alternate/correct version of Chola history is subject of the research and book by Dr Jayasree Saranathan who has published her findings in her book in Tamil (“ஆதித்த கரிகாலனைக் கொன்றது யார்?”) and its English translation titled “Who killed Āditya Karikāla?: The historical facts” available in print/Kindle. She has relied on solid evidence to advance her propositions.

Why this post :
From a legal perspective the supposed imperial monarchical convention followed by the Cholas which accounts for the correct assessment of the regnal years of Chola kings, the aspects of primo geniture as well as the quaint succession law of tanistry made an interesting study for me.

History certainly needs to be rewritten and lineages and succession lines redrawn. I would certainly recommend reading this book in Tamil if you can and if you cant, the English version should be the second best.
**
To get the print copy of the book in English, write to jayasreebooks@gmail.com
For Tamil version, click HERE
For Kindle version, click HERE for Tamil version.  
Click HERE for English version.

Sunday, October 27, 2024

Tamil Naadu or Dravida Naadu (my talk in Twitter Space)

Like a piece of junk food, the talk of 'Dravidam' keeps raising its head from time to time. When it was the talk of the town during Karunanidhi's rule, some 13 years ago, I started a website named "Thamizhan Dravidana" to study the Dravidian concept and had written more than a hundred research articles. Read a sample article here.

திராவிடமும், திராவிடரும்

The obsession with Dravidam continues in the current regime of the DMK too. 

In this connection I was called to speak on Dravidam in a Twitter Space.




It can be heard here:


Saturday, October 26, 2024

My talk about Ayudha Puja in Mediayaan channel

Due to pre-occupations, I couldn't post some of my videos in the past few weeks. 

Let me start uploading here one by one starting with my interview in Mediyaan News Channel on Ayudha puja.

In this interview I am answering questions such as 

# Is Ayudha Puja an Arya festival?

# Why should we celebrate it?

# Does celebration of Ayudha Puja mean celebration of violence?

I also pointed out the details of the Vettuva Vari in Silappadhikaram as the earliest evidence of Ayudha Puja.

Apart from that, the 'TuRai" called VaaN Mangalam mentioned in Tolkappiyam shows that there was a practice of worshiping weapons. In connection with that, there is a Purananuru verse about Avvaiyar talking to Tondaimaan.

In Pari Paadal there is also a description of Mallars decorating their weapons.

All these are not pujas done just for the sake of preparing for the war.

It is a pooja performed every year on Maha Navami which is the day of Ayudha Puja. 

In this connection, I discussed the epigraphical evidence and literary evidence found in Periya Puranam.

The interview can be watched here:




Saturday, September 7, 2024

Part 2 of my talk on Lanka (Q-A session)

 In the 2nd part of my talk on Lanka, I am replying to questions such as

# Types of Yuga and Rama's birth in Treta yuga # Reference to two Agastya-s in Sugreeva's version # Presence of Agastya in two Tamil sangam-s # How to justify 100 yojana length of Ram setu # The mention of 1000s of years in different contexts in Valmiki Ramayana # Origin of Tamil-Sanskrit.

The talk was given to Satyameva Jayate channel.
It can viewed here:



Monday, August 26, 2024

My talk about Bhagawan Krishna, Nappinnai and Raasa Leela

 My talk in Tamil on various details about Bhagawan Krishna and Krishna Jayanti.

# Why is Krishna Jayanti celebrated on two different dates?

# Krishna can be regarded as the son-in-law of the Tamil people by having married Nappinnai.

# Details about the identity of Nappinnai and her original name.

# Descendants of Krishna in Tamil Nadu.

# Raasa Leela of Krishna – did Krishna misbehave with women?

# Raasa Leela described in Aga Nanuru.

# Purport of Raasa Leela.



Monday, August 19, 2024

Review of "ராமானுஜ இதிகாசம்" in Dinamani

இராமானுஜாசரியார் வாழ்க்கை நிகழ்ச்சிகளை உண்மை என்று நிரூபிக்கும் நூல்.

அவர் சோழ அரசன் கொடுத்த தொந்திரவால் நாட்டை விட்டு வெளியேறியது உண்மை என்பதையும், அந்த அரசன் யார் என்பதையும், கல்வெட்டு முதலான ஆதராங்கள் மூலம் இந்த நூல் நிரூபிக்கிறது. 

அவ்வாறு வெளியேறிய அவர் எத்தனை காலம் நாட்டுக்கு வெளியே இருந்தார் என்பதையும், அந்த காலக் கட்டத்தில் மைசூர் அருகே மேல்கோட்டை என்னுமிடத்தில், முகலாயர் படையெடுப்பால் அழிந்த கோயிலைப் புதுப்பித்ததையும், தில்லிக்குச் சென்று, முகலாயர் வசம் இருந்த மேல்கோட்டை உத்சவ மூர்த்தியைத் திரும்பப் பெற்றார் என்பவை முதலான பல சரித்திர விவரங்களையும், ஆதாரங்களுடன் விளக்குகிறது இந்த நூல்.

மேலும், சிதம்பரத்தில், கோவிந்தராஜப் பெருமானை கடலில் தூக்கி எறிந்த சோழ அரசன் யார் என்பதையும், அங்கிருந்த உத்சவ மூர்த்தியைக் காப்பாற்றி திருப்பதில் இராமானுஜர் பிரதிஷ்டை செய்த வரலாற்றையும் சான்றுகளுடன் இந்த நூல் நிரூபிக்கிறது.

பின்னூட்டங்களாகக் கொடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ள விவரங்கள் ஜாதிச் சண்டைகள் உண்டான வரலாற்றையும், திப்பு சுல்தானால், மண்டையம் ஐயங்கார்கள் கொல்லப்பட்ட விவரத்தையும் தருகின்றன. 



தினமணி - 22-07-2024


புத்தகத்தைப் பெற இங்கு க்ளிக் செய்யவும்:





Review of " ஆதித்த கரிகாலனைக் கொன்றது யார்?" in Dinakaran and Dinamani

 கல்வெட்டுகள் அடிப்படையில் ஆதித்த கரிகாலன் வாழ்க்கைப் பின்னணியையும், அவன் மறைவின் காரணத்தையும் விளக்கும் நூல். அருள்மொழி வர்மன் எனப்படும் இராஜராஜ சோழன் காந்தளூர் சாலை கலமறுத்தது எவ்வாறு என்பதையும் விளக்குகிறது

தினகரன் 14-07-2024

தினமணி 04-08-2024



புத்தகத்தைப் பெற இங்கு கிளிக் செய்யவும்:





Thursday, July 11, 2024

Ramayana 5114 BCE - my talk in Pesu Thamizha Pesu

 Rama was born on 5114 BCE.

The historical evidences for this date were explained in this interview to Pesu Thamizha Pesu Channel.

I replied to various questions including the Yuga basis for the Ramayana period. 

The decipherment of Ramayana Time-line can be read in my 16-part series starting from HERE 



My talk about the controversy over the installation of Sengol (Pesu Thamizha Pesu)

 Recently a  controversy was raised by the Samajwadi Party MP, Mr. RK. Chaudhary that the Sengol represents monarchy and therefore must be removed from the Parliament. In this connection I gave an interview to Pesu Thamizha Pesu Channel on how it is not a symbol of monarchy. It was not Tamilnadu centric either because the steatites found in the Harappan contain images that resemble the Sengol. I also explained for the 'Soma' vessel in front of the animal figures in the Harappan seals could have been the miniature version of the Sengol. More arguments were put forth by me from Tamil sources too.



Tuesday, July 9, 2024

Review of my book on Aditya Karikala by Dr. K.V. Balasubramanian

Dr. K.V. Balasubramanian, the well known meteorologist, author and writer of several books and articles has written a review of my book, ' ஆதித்த கரிகாலனைக் கொன்றது யார்?" His review can be read HERE.

Reproducing the same below.

My sincere thanks to him for the review.

The book can be obtained from Swasam Publishers at this LINK

***

Book review 

By Dr. K.V. Balasubramanian,

Meteorologist, Writer and translator

Book – written in Tamil language

Name of the book – Who killed Adittha Karikalan (Historical facts in Ponniyin Selvan)

Author – Dr. Jayashree Saranathan – முனைவர் ஜெயஸ்ரீ சாரநாதன்

To buy the book – Swasam Book Art, +91 8148066645

Price – Rs. 190/-


“Who Killed Adittha Karikalan? (Historical Facts of Ponni Selvan)” written by Dr Jayashree Saranathan? has 149 pages; The book is divided into 10 sub-topics. The author has researched many inscriptions and written in this book. In particular, she has used a computer planetarium software called 'Jhora' to define the reigns of the Chola kings.

 In the first stage, she found and wrote about the reign period of various Chola kings through inscriptional researches. Last year I got an opportunity to translate a Tamil book comparing Mr. Narendra Modi with Rajaraja Chola into Hindi. At that time, I had two doubts: (1) According to The Law of Primogeniture, the son will become the king after the father. But how did the king's brother become king? (2) The time period of a king begins before the death of the previous king. How is it? The author has given excellent explanations for these two questions in his book.

 The Chola kings ruled with the titles “Parakesari” and “Rajakesari”. Author Dr. Jayashree Saranathan has explained that there is a system in this too. Was Veerapandian killed by Adittha Karikala Chola? or Parthivendra Chola? Parthipan, who appears in Ponni's Selvan, is he the same person. The Author has mentioned these thing in her book and answered these questions.

 The book is written in a good research style. At the end of the book, the chronology of the Chola emperors and the Tamil names of the 60 years from 907 to 1027 are given.

 This book is a treasure trove of research; Excellent study book. I hope everyone will enjoy reading it.