Kalavai Venkat’a brilliant critique of HAF Report on castes.

 

Given below are the few passages from Kalavai Venkat's critique of damaging report on Hindu castes by the HAF.

The entire text can be read at

 

http://sookta-sumana.blogspot.com/2011/02/haf-report-haf-baked-lamentation.html

 

Refutation of the HAF report done by Rajiv Malhotra and Sandhya Jain can be read here :-

Rajiv Malhotra on HAF "Caste" Report

Sandhya Jain on Caste & the misconceived report of HAF

************

 

 

Caste: a HAF-baked lamentation

 

By

 

Kalavai Venkat

 

 

 

HAF plays the fiddle in the missionary choir

The HAF-baked report alleges that the Hindu bhakti movement originally was a rebellion against Hindu orthodoxy, Brahmin priests, Hindu rituals, and the caste system. This is the pet theory of Christian missionaries and Marxist propagandists. The report faithfully repeats what the Hindu-baiter Romila Thapar wrote in her book Early India that I critiqued at length a few years ago.[4] The efflorescence of the Hindu bhakti movement was signaled by the arrival of the Saiva Nayanmars and the Vaishnava Azhwars in the first half of the first millennium in the Tamil country and flourished until the 16th century. The report alleges, without basis and echoing the Christian propaganda, that the bhakti movement was originally considered unorthodox (by the Brahmins).

Nayanmars and Azhwars sang their hymns advocating devotion to Siva and Vishnu respectively. The only polemics in their hymns are directed at Jainas and Bauddhas who are portrayed as opposing Vedic sacrifices.[5] Those were the times of the Kalabbhra rule in the Tamil country. The Kalabbhras are believed to have patronized Buddhism and Jainism. Bhakti saints bemoan the fact that paraphernalia needed to perform rituals in temples have been withheld by the Jainas. There is nothing in their writings that can be construed as a polemic directed at Brahmins or against rituals.

The great Saiva saint Appar, one of the Nayanmars, praises Siva as the Lord of the Vedas.[6] He declares that he was a Jaina ascetic once, during which time he was distracted from pursuing the truth. Sambantar, another great Saiva Nayanmar, has written at length about the greatness of the Vedic sacrifices, and has sharp words for those (the reference here is to the Jainas and other heterodox sects) that oppose the Vedic sacrifices. The absurd claim that bhakti saints opposed caste is belied by the very words of another great Saiva Nayanmar and exponent on tantra Tirumular, who sings:

Of crystal made is the Linga, the Brahmins worship

Of gold, the Kings worship

Of emerald, the Vaishyas worship

Of stone is the Linga, the Shudras worship[7]

The bhakti tradition was the torchbearer of Hindu orthodoxy during the medieval period. Will the HAF please illuminate which of these verses can be perceived as a rebellion against orthodox Hinduism, caste, or rituals? What compulsion made them distort Hindu texts and traditions and lend credence to a propaganda originally instituted by Christian missionaries and disseminated by the likes of Romila Thapar who deny there was any negative impact on Hinduism owing to iconoclastic invaders? Is this merely the case of sheer ignorance of Hindu traditions and texts on the part of HAF writers? Do they derive their knowledge of Hinduism only from tracts and translations written by Christians that are antagonistic towards dharma?

It is important to understand te Bhakti movement in its historical context. The Sangam literature is the precursor to the Bhakti movement. In the Sangam texts, the four Varnas were the norm as well as the ideal. One of the songs says that even though a person may belong to a lower Varna among the four, if he were to acquire knowledge, then those born of the higher Varnas would respect him.[8] Another song says that even if those of higher birth fell into poverty, the virtues of their higher birth wouldn't desert them,[9] while yet another says that one's character could only be commensurate with what is befitting the Varna into which he is born.[10] The oldest extant Tamil grammatical treatise also recognizes Varna.[11] The great Tamil savant Tiruvalluvar categorically stated that a Brahmin who forgets the Vedas could learn them again, but should he ever cease to be moral, the virtue of his high birth is lost forever. Elsewhere, he argues that the scruples of a king are measured against his ability to safeguard the Vedic learning of the Brahmins.[12] Thus regard for Brahmins, the Vedas and for learning in general was a feature common to all Hindus, and it was in this milieu that the Bhakti movement was born.
So it is not surprising to see the Bhakti saints express the same veneration for the Vedas and the Brahmins. But their central focus was moksha or liberation whereas the karma kanda of the Vedas, as evident from the Purva Mimamsa doctrine of Jaimini, were primarily concerned with only three of the four purusharthas: dharma, artha, and kama. Bhakti transcends these and emphasizes on the the fourth purushartha. It would be the height of ignorance to interpret this as antagonism towards the Vedas.

Blame the victim, exonerate the oppressors

The HAF dedicates the report:

"To All Those Who Have Suffered From Caste-based Discrimination Over The Centuries

We Regret That Hindu Society Failed To Live Up To Its Highest Teachings

To Those Who Remained Committed Hindus Despite this Failure"

Untouchability is first recorded in India in the 12th century CE. Its origins in The Bible and its parallels from elsewhere in the world will be discussed in a future report. Many parts of India had by then been colonized by Islamic invaders. There was large-scale plunder and rape. Hindu society had well-defined rules that prohibited harming civilians during war. This fact is not only reflected in ancient Sanskrit and Tamil literature but is also recognized by Greek chroniclers who are surprised that peasants observe a battle in progress without fearing harm. The large-scale rapine committed by Islamic invaders would have shocked Hindu society in a way difficult for us to comprehend today.

 

Let us discuss a few examples of the circumstances that would have made it impossible for Hindus to fight inequities such as untouchability that came into vogue in India during this period.
Rishi Devala, appearing in the Sindh province in the 10th century CE, wrote a very laudable text called Devala Smriti in which he laid down the guidelines for the ablutions that a victim of rape might undergo so that she emerges pure—contrast this to the practice in Islamic society even today of "honor killings" when a woman is raped. In the west, even today, many victims of rape are psychologically and emotionally scarred for life because rape is essentially an act that signals the subjugation and total humiliation of the victim. It destroys, in Mahatma Gandhi's words, one's inner core. In pre-Islamic India, where crimes such as rape were unheard of, and where the feminine was considered sacred, the effect would have been traumatic. Rishi Devala's benign and wise prescription would have helped those victims overcome trauma and perceive themselves as sacred again.

 

This pattern of plunder continued for centuries as evident from the fact that Rajput women, when faced with the inevitable rape at the hands of the Islamic invaders, after the Rajput men fought and died valiantly in the battlefield, resorted to sati and jauhar. In denying their would-be rapists an opportunity to rape those courageous women emerged victorious though they paid with their lives in the process. This practice did not cease after the British Christian conquest of India because resort to jauhar continued sporadically.

The Jats are another Hindu jati that put up valiant resistance to the invading Muslims. Needless to say, many Jat youth perished defending India. Many young Jat women were widowed and their children were rendered orphans. The Jat community resorted to the ancient Hindu custom of niyoga enabling the younger brother of the slain warrior to marry the widow. This not only offered protection and continuity of life to the woman but also enabled orphaned children find a new father who was a blood relative. In the west, even today, when a woman remarries, the child faces the prospect of abuse at the hands of the step-father when the child escapes the predatory attention of the Christian clergy. The Jat solution, on the other hand, rid two problems with one solution.

Even the pro-Muslim Cambridge Economic History of India (volume 1), edited by Marxist critics of Hinduism, Irfan Habib and Tapan Raychaudhuri, highlights the devastating famines precipitated by the brutal revenue collection of Islamic rulers that left the peasantry impoverished and dying, hardly propitious circumstances for Hindus to perform any kind of religious duty! It is the ignorance of this history that makes the attempted HAF critique of alleged Hindu 'human rights' violators, when they did not even have the ability to protect their womenfolk and survive hunger, particularly objectionable.

Islamic domination was supplanted by British Christian subjugation of Hindus. Mike Davis, in his well-documented treatise, The Late Victorian Holocaust, shows how exploitative British agrarian policies unleashed famine and starvation and pushed numerous agrarian jatis beyond the pale of civilized existence. Many jatis had to lose their lands to become indentured labor to pay exorbitant taxes to their Christian masters. Many such castes, having been cut off from all support systems, ended up as disenfranchised and eventually untouchable. Data proves that the practice of untouchability and the incidents of caste discrimination in the 20th century India are directly proportional to the extent of the lack of land ownership of the Harijan jatis. On the other hand, such practices of discrimination are practically non-existent in major Indian cities because anonymous cities are not governed by an agrarian economic system.

Dharampal was a highly trusted historian. Mahatma Gandhi asked him to research the plight of education in Hindu India. The factual findings were published in a research volume titled The Beautiful Tree. Dharampal marshals persuasive evidence to prove that wherever the Hindus could sustain their institutions, they educated all jatis in their traditional schools or patasalas. Every jati, including the Harijans, was proportionally represented as teachers and students, as evident from the Madras Presidency 1822-25 (Collectors Reports), Details of Schools & Colleges, Caste Division of Male school students:[13]

	Brahmins	Vaishyas	Shudras	Others	Muslims	Total
# of students	30,211	13,459	75,943	22,925	10,644	1,53,182
% of total student population	20	9	50	15	6	100

This would change in the 19th century when Christian missionaries, backed by the brute power of the colonial British administration, systematically destroyed traditional schools and denied education to a large section of Hindus. The new system of schools ushered in by the Christian missionaries charged exorbitant fees and denied entry to the Harijans. This resulted in disparate access to education across Hindu society. The celebrated patriot, social reformer, and scholar, Suddhananda Bharati documents the travails a Hindu family had to undergo to acquire education in missionary institutions. A lack of education led to difficulties finding gainful employment, plunging these Hindu families into poverty. It was not a coincidence that many revolutionaries in the initial phase of India's freedom struggle hailed from Hindu families that had pledged everything so that their sons could get educated in missionary institutions.

Thus, Hindus were themselves a subjugated and disenfranchised people during the course of the millennium. How could such a people have marshaled the wherewithal to fight a social evil such as untouchability that emerged precisely during this period of Hindu disenfranchisement? HAF's accusation against Hindus is not just absurd but also unethical. It is akin to blaming the blacks for slavery and the Jews for not attempting to save other Jews from the Holocaust. It is shameful that the report tacitly exonerates Christian missionaries and British colonial rulers guilty of instigating and institutionalizing many forms of discrimination by laying the blame at the doorstep of Hindus. The HAF report gives the impression that caste structure has been rigid in Hindu society. The American scholar, Nicholas R. Dirks, refutes this and highlights the hugely negative impact of attempts by British colonial administrators to enumerate and often artificially impute caste identities in censuses undertaken. In his view, these censuses artificially ossified caste identities, which were in reality much more fluid before. This view is confirmed by census data from the early 20th century that Prof. M N Srinivas marshals. As the sample from census data summarized below reveals until then entire jatis could move across the varna system in a very short span of time: [14]

 

Jati Name	Occupation	1911 Census	1921 Census	1931 Census
Kamar	Blacksmith	None	Kshatriya	Brahmin
Sonar	Goldsmith	Kshatriya	Kshatriya	Brahmin-Vaishya
Sutradar	Carpenter	Vaishya	Vaishya	Brahmin
Nai	Barber	None	Kshatriya	Brahmin
Napit	Barber	Kshatriya	Vaishya	Brahmin

The following table summarizes the number of jatis and their new varna status per the 1931 census:[15]

Newly claimed Varna status →	Brahmin	Kshatriya	Vaishya
Traditional Varna status ↓
Shudra	31	49	9
Harijan	2	26	5
Tribal	1	5	1

It was the British obsession with classification that would eventually lead to ossification subsequently witnessed in Hindu society.

 

Even Islamic and Marxist historians such as Irfan Habib have been more honest than the HAF on this count! Irfan Habib and his father Mohammad Habib fearlessly and unhesitatingly documented the subjugation of the Hindus at the hands of British Christian colonial masters as a result of the inhumane agrarian policies that were forced upon the farmers. Admittedly, the Habibs did not feel compelled to please the Christian establishment in the USA or to collaborate with them on some human rights agenda unlike ostensible contemporary defenders of Hindus.
Christian missionaries should be grateful to the HAF for this unexpected windfall. Hope they would one day reciprocate by doing unto the HAF what the HAF has done unto the missionaries with this report.

 

Affirming the Christian hate speech

Next the report declares, quoting the words of Ambedkar, that:

"There is no nation of Indians in the real sense of the word, it is yet to be created. In believing we are a nation, we are cherishing a great delusion. How can people divided into thousands of castes be a nation? The sooner we realise that we are not yet a nation, in a social and psychological sense of the world, the better for us."

What HAF has failed to understand is there is a world of difference between the nation as a political and territorial unit and the socio-cultural interconnectedness of a people. The former is a creation of the modern world, evolving and regularly challenged while the latter has ancient roots that highlight the profound potential unity of man immanent in the Hindu world view.
Hinduism is governed by the motto "Vasudaiva kutumbakam" or the entire world is a family. Hinduism celebrates diversity and preserves it. It recognizes the fact that unity is meaningful only where diversity exists. The caste system is a glowing example of the Hindu commitment to preserving all traditions. Each jati could follow different wedding, funerary, or dietary customs, or speak different dialects or languages. Yet they have always shared a common spiritual and cultural identity. Notions of dharma formed the core of such a shared identity.

 
At the same time, Indians clearly knew how to distinguish themselves from foreigners who did not share either their culture or their notions of dharma. In the Sangam Tamil literature, Roman mercenaries (yavanas) serving the royalty were called mlecchas following strange customs. The lack of hygiene of the European Christian colonizers repulsed Indians so much that they considered their colonial masters untouchables. From time immemorial, dharmasutra texts clearly delineated the boundaries that separated those who followed the Dharma in the homeland of Hindu society and those who lived beyond the borders and did not share our cultural values.

It was expedient for the British colonial rulers and Christian missionaries to plant the canard that India as an entity never existed because that enabled them to divide, rule, and convert Hindus. What expediency governs the HAF in parroting the same canard?
This is not merely a canard. This is hate speech. Christianity and Islam seek to achieve homogeneity to dominate. Historically, Christian and Islamic invaders derived inspiration from their scriptures and committed genocide of many races including the Native Americans, Gypsies, and the Jews. Diversity, wherever encountered, first attracted the suspicion of the Christian church and then resulted in hatred of the "other," leading the Church to create fault lines and fissures, which were then exploited by the Church to divide and conquer throughout its history.

Prof. D. E. Stannard, in his daring treatise, The American Holocaust, documents how the Christian intolerance of diversity resulted in the genocide of over 100 million Native Americans. In my paper, From the Holy Cross to the Holocaust, published as part of the anthology Expressions of Christianity, I have shown how the Christian intolerance of diversity resulted in hate speech directed at the Jews which finally culminated in the Holocaust.

 

To argue that a society cannot attain unity despite diversity and divisions among its many castes is a notion that must be vigorously opposed. Historically, homogeneity has been regarded by oppressive elites as essential for political domination and control. The virtual eradication of European Jewry by Adolf Hitler was very much in this political mould and tradition. It has also been cultivated by the Church in its endless wars over heresy and the succession of its chosen royal houses. The USA is a prime example of how the obsession for homogeneity led to the genocide of Native Americans. In subsequent times, the blacks would be denied their freedom to follow their African religious traditions and speak their diverse languages eventually getting absorbed into the American society as segregated Christians. But their churches remain separate since whites and blacks apparently ascend or descend to a different heaven or hell on expiring, depending on their antecedent skin color! The contrasting equanimity of Hinduism in the face of diversity and its serenity over religious difference is a dramatic contrast that has been remarked on by many thoughtful observers.

It is sad to see the HAF advancing Christian hate speech to claim that unity is dependent on homogeneity. Many white supremacist groups in the USA too harbor a similar notion that for America to exist as an entity all Americans should be white, Christian, and only speak English. Dalits Christians are also asserting that India's national language should be English (code for endorsing Christianity as the national religion)! The HAF report will appeal to such groups but it would also earn the HAF a nomination for the Darwin Awards.[16]

 

Burn the Hindu sacred books!

The HAF-baked report was extensively reviewed, and possibly contributed to, by Jaishree Gopal and Prof. V V Raman (who goes by the fancy title Acharya Vidyasagar these days), two prominent members of the anti-Hindu group Navyashastra, which disseminates calls to burn sacred Hindu scriptures. The HAF report seems to prepare the way for this eventuality when it first acknowledges that none of the Hindu scriptures supports untouchability only to conclude that Hindu scriptures such as The Manusmriti promote caste bias, prompting HAF to call for their rejection by Hindu acharyas. The HAF is clearly oblivious to the fact that The Manusmriti is considered a defining text of great antiquity in Hinduism even though it has not been the code of law for millennia.

 

Hinduism is not a religion of the book(s) as HAF correctly acknowledges. Shruti and smriti are one of the many pramanas in Hinduism. Each sampradaya lays varying emphasis on a given shruti or smriti pramana. Then where is the need to reject an ancient text such as The Manusmriti? Internal analysis indicates that it was compiled in the Magadha province or the modern Indian state of Bihar. We do not know who its author was. The text attained a central place in Hindu history. Many other law texts were written over time but The Manusmriti was remembered as the gold standard. The great saint and philosopher, Tiruvalluvar, a Harijan by birth, renders sections of the Manusmriti into couplets in the Tirukkural. The legendary Chola king renowned for his sense of justice is remembered by the title Manu Niti Chola. The well-known poet Kambar hailed from a backward caste and rendered Valmiki's Ramayana in Tamil in which he evaluates Sri Rama's adherence to justice by using Manu as the gold standard.

 

The influence of Manu was symbolic, articulating the sanctity of the Vedas by its very presence, and not literal. It is futile to retroactively inject modern secular concerns in interpreting these ancient texts. Manu was the foremost lawgiver. Even though new texts emerged as society changed, and these various texts (rather than The Manusmriti) have been the codes of law during the historic period, Manu's contribution was not forgotten. In other words, the HAF is asking our acharyas to reject a text that has not been in vogue for millennia and which is rare to obtain today. A powerful case was made affirming this point by the feminist critic of Hinduism, Madhu Kishwar.

Most of our saints and powerful emperors have been Harijans or shudras. Yet, none of them found The Manusmriti to be a discriminatory text. Instead, they hailed it as a lofty text that safeguarded everyone's interests. Should not the authors of the HAF report have thought for a while as to why all attacks on this sacred text originated only from Christian missionaries while our saints had only words of praise for it? Anti-Brahminism and the stigmatizing of the word shudra are also of Christian missionary origin. Powerful kings of the past had proudly identified themselves as shudras. Vema Reddy, a great Hindu king who defeated the Muslim marauders called himself "a proud shudra who, like the sacred river Ganga, emerged from the feet of Vishnu."[17] He also equated himself with the sage Agastya. Vema Reddy's grandson was a celebrated Sanskrit scholar who wrote a commentary on the works of Kalidasa bearing testimony to the fact that learned men emerged from all varnas but none of them found our scriptures to be discriminating.

 

If the HAF has bothered to read The Manusmriti and its various commentaries in the original, they would have realized that the text does not promote caste bias. It does not accord preferential treatment to one caste over another. The text promotes social harmony. In pre-modern times most societies were rural and agrarian. People had limited mobility. Most occupations were hereditary. In such a society, it is important to safeguard the interests of various castes. The dharmashastra texts and texts on polity such as The Arthashastra aim to achieve this objective. The Arthashastra introduces the concept of sreni or guilds (such guilds were common in proto-Industrial Europe and considered essential precursors to modernity) to protect the interests of artisans and transmit knowledge to succeeding generations.  The Chanakya Niti disallows the Brahmins from taking to dairy farming, weaving & dyeing, and selling oil. These would have been the mainstay occupations providing livelihood to a vast majority of people in the ancient period. The dharmashastra writers, by denying Brahmins entry into these professions, were protecting the interests of many castes. Similarly, they were protecting the interests of Brahmins and a few others by restricting who could perform Veda yajnas. These stipulations varied over time and across geography depending on social conditions and various dharmashastra texts addressed those needs.

 

For instance in The Silappadikaram, a Jaina saint considers it inauspicious when the Brahmins give up chanting of the Vedas and take to other professions. The newly married Kovalan and Kannagi are dissuaded from entering a settlement where the Brahmin musicians reside, again because they have taken to a profession that is not allowed for them.[18]

 

It is pointless to self-righteously denounce such ancient texts animated by western prejudices since their rationale was contingent and contemporary in ways hard for us to comprehend.
Many important Hindu monarchs were Shudras or Harijans. A significant number of key Hindu scriptures were written by Harijans. Vyasa, Valmiki, Tiruvalluvar, Tirumazhisai Azhwar were all Harijans while other great poets such as Kambar were from what is known as the Shudra varna. These saints even refused to please powerful kings. On one occasion, the tradition says, when the king ordered a Vaishnava to leave the town for refusing to eulogize the king, the Harijan saint Tirumazhisai Azhwar left the town. Not only that, he ordered Sri Vishnu to leave the town with them. Sri Vishnu promptly complied. The message here is very clear. The saints will not bow their head to anyone other than Bhagavan. Had the dharmashastra texts been promoting bias as a matter of principle none of these great thinkers would have held them in high regard.
Evidently, the HAF decided to seek their knowledge of the dharmashastras from hostile Christian missionary propaganda instead of understanding them the way Hindu traditions have usually understood them. Even their call to denounce sections of the dharmashastras is an echo of the Christian habit of denouncing and declaring texts the church did not like as heresy.

Hinduism has a rich tradition of dealing with texts and practices that are no longer relevant. Our acharyas do not deny or denounce them. They just move on and write texts relevant to the times as Rishi Devala did during the Islamic invasions. The appeal to acharyas to denounce those texts is absurd. Hindu scriptures have evolved by absorbing and modifying different traditions they encountered without the denunciation and purges that are the hallmark of religions that murder and burn those they describe as heretics. Which other sacred tradition views the atheism of Nastikas with such serenity? How can one insinuate bigotry and intolerance against such a plural and tolerant scriptural tradition except for the mundane purpose of aiding imperial subjugation, the norm for Islam and Christianity?

 

It is also a selective appeal.

There is no text on the planet which is more violent and discriminatory than The Bible. Prof. Norman Beck has documented more than 450 antisemitic verses in the Bible[19]. Other eminent scholars have shown that the Bible with its anti-Semitism is deplorable while without anti-Semitism it is unthinkable. Christians see it as a literal text revealed by God. Hence they persecuted the Jews and sent them to the gas chambers during the Holocaust. Jesus also calls for forcible conversions and the genocide of non-believers. These teachings legitimated the genocide of Native Americans in order to usurp their land. Abominable practices such as untouchability are first found in the Bible, which is also easily available in many languages and widely circulated.

Yet, the HAF has not called upon the pope or the leading pastors to reject sections of the Bible which are inhumane. This is strange because, in the foreword to the report, Prof. Ramdas Lamb first declares other religions inherited caste discrimination from Hinduism then hopes "that this report can inspire like-minded Hindus and non-Hindus to work together to bring justice and a sense of equality to all Indians irrespective of caste or religion." It seems as though all religions should share the credit for removing discrimination but it is only Hindu texts that should be condemned. Ironically, a Hindu organization has made this call!

 

Hindu acharyas will not denounce any dharmashastra because, firstly, that is not a Hindu tradition, and especially so because they are knowledgeable of these texts and are aware that these lofty texts promoted social harmony. Hindus will denounce the HAF report, and by extension HAF's ability and standing to represent Hindus.

When are we going to have a Million-man March against corruption?

A Million –man March is now going on against a corrupt regime in Egypt. Similar uprisings are happening in Tunisia and Jordan. Hearing these, I am left wondering what we are doing in our country that has the most corrupt men running the government.

 

What I see in the uprisings is a definite Celestial plan which started with Saturn going retrograde on 26^th January. Should not the same Plan help us in India to bring to book the corrupt elements and deport the Mother of the Corrupt to her native country?

 

The corrupt are going around as though nothing has happened. The two most corrupt are meeting in Delhi to make a pact so that they can go on unhindered for the next 5 years in their mission. The Egyptians are not able to tolerate a corrupt and irritating regime for 30 years. 30 years is one round of Saturn. But we are not raising a whimper against the looters who are looting Tamilnadu for 40 years!

It is a shame that there is not a single Congress leader in Tamilnadu who can call the shots against Karunanidhi.

The most disappointing one is GK.Vasan.

We did not know about him until Moopanaar was there.

Whatever acceptance he has among the people is because of the good name his father had.

His father listened to his conscience, but it is doubtful if GK Vasan has any conscience at all.

He is bound to fall because Justice System is that the first blow will be dealt to the honest one who did not do anything to uphold Righteousness.

It will take a long time for destiny - even many births to teach lessons to Karunanidhi. But good people are supposed to act good always.

They are the ones who can correct the system.

It is highly disappointing that GK Vasan is still clinging to his seat and serving to Sonia's misdeeds.

 

In these circumstances, the happenings in Egypt raises hopes in the Fair play of Planets in making things happen.

                                                                                                              

Some fascinating combinations are ruling the skies at the moment. Even though we do not take into consideration Pluto, I don not want to undermine its power in bringing out revolutions and transformations.

In the sidereal zodiac it is moving to the middle of the Sagittarius, the house of Justice. From there it is aspecting Gemini, the 6^th house from the 10^th in the Natural zodiac. The 10^th lord is in the 6^th and just begun retrogression and casting its aspect on the 6^th to the 10^th (Gemini.)

 

The combined aspect of Pluto and Saturn in Gemini brings out a change through communications systems. Pluto's aspect on Gemini has an impact on telecommunications playing a role in bringing out revolutionary trends. The wikileaks and Radia tapes are the real heroes in this revolution.

The Jupiter – Saturn opposition as 9^th and 10^th lords in the Natural Zodiac is also a good proposition for the world at large in terms of installing Justice.

Looking at India's Independence chart, the moon sign is cancer.

The reckoning must be made form moon sign.

Jupiter as 9^th lord in 9^th is an encouraging sign at the present times for Justice to have an upper hand.

Saturn is the 10^th lord from the natal lagna which is now in retro in the 3^rd.

In democratic set-ups, sun represents the government and Saturn is the people's power. By retrogression Saturn, the natural enemy of the sun is veering towards Leo, the sign of sun.

It is in Hastha now which is detrimental to thieves and looters.

With Jupiter's aspect to it, retro - Saturn represents people's anger against the corrupt. The current period for India is Sun – Rahu which began on November 4, 2010 and will last until September 29, 2011.

It must be noted that A.Raja episode broke out as soon as this period started.

Sun- Rahu is a bad time for rulers, but Saturn – Jupiter transit is good time for the people, for Justice.

 

On Feb 5^th, Dr Subramanian swamy's case on 2G case is coming up.

Let that open the annals of new chapter of activism of an All India character against the corrupt.

We have to make Million-man march to unseat Sonia and Karunanidhi.

We, the billion people of India must teach them a lesson.          

On Yuga-Classification and what causes Yugas

On yugas, in several places in Mahabharata it is said that Yuga is formed by the King / by the dharma.
The yuga classification of Surya Siddhantha is astronomy.
But in human life, dharma and danda neeti determine the Yugas.

Proof from Mahabharata:-

• (Shanti parva -140)

'O bull of Bharata's race, that Krita, Treta, Dwapara, and Kali, as regards their setting in, are all dependent on the king's conduct.'

• (Shanti parva – 68)

'Whether it is the king that makes the age, or, it is the age that makes the king, is a question about which thou shouldst not entertain any doubt. The truth is that the king makes the age.

The king is the creator of the Krita age, of the Treta, and of the Dwapara. The king is the cause of the fourth age called Kali. '

• Krishna to karna (Udyoga parva 142)

'when thou wilt hear the twang of Gandiva piercing the welkin like the very thunder, then all signs of the Krita, the Treta, and the Dwapara ages will disappear but, instead, Kali embodied will be present.'

• 
  Kunti (Udhyoga parva -132)
  
  

'When the king properly abides by the penal code, without making any portion of it a dead letter, then that best of periods called the Krita Yuga sets in. Let not this doubt be thine, viz, whether the era is the cause of the king, or the king the cause of the era, for know this to be certain that the king is the cause of the era. It is the king that creates the Krita, the Treta, or the Dwapara age. Indeed, it is the king that is the cause of also the fourth Yuga viz, the Kali'

• Markandeya (vana parva – 187) Yuga calculation very well detailed

• Vana parva 148 – Hanuman also gives a good explanation on yuga

****************

I rely on Markandeya's version.

According to him the years of yugas are


400 + 4000 + 400 = 4,800
300 + 3000 + 300 = 3,600
200 + 2000 + 200 = 2,400
100 + 1000 + 100 = 1,200
                           = 12,000
Add 10-% sandhi for this before and after
1,200 + 1,200 = 2,400
Total = 12,000 +   2,400 = 14,400 years.

The ascending and descending of this = 14,400 + 14,400 = 28,800 years

15 times of this 28,800 = kali maha yuga duration at cosmic level (4,32,000 )

150 times this 28,800 = 1 chathur maha yuga

150,000 times this 28,800 = 1 kalpa.


On the other side, let us see the split up of 28,800 years = precession of the sun around the zodiac.


60 years is the basic unit.
This is equal to the years in one conjunction of the planets of dharma (Jupiter) and karma (saturn)
Jupiter's 1 revolution = 12 years

Saturn's 1 revolution = 30 years.

They conjunct in the same place in the same sign once in 60 years. So this is the basic life of dharma - karma of a man.

The ascending and descending part = 60 +60 = 120 years.
120 times 120 = 14,400
14,400 + 14,400 = 28, 800

Now  connect this with what I wrote above.

Previous posts:-

Rama in Treta yuga – Yuga is defined on the basis of dharma and not the number of years.

Ram Sethu – issues on volcanism and yuga classification.

Did Rama rule for 11,000 years?

http://thamizhan-thiravidana.blogspot.com/2010/12/15.html

Hindu students have a bleak future in India.

From

http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=382&page=9

The political conspiracy against Young India By OP Gupta, IFS (Retd) THE Congress Party aided and abetted by communists and socialists has been steadily enacting rules and regulations to harm and hurt educational, employment and economic (E-3) interests of all Hindu youth. Recommendations of the Sachar Committee and the Ranganath Mishra Commission are on one hand based on total falsehood, and, on the other hand, are violative of Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India with aim to fulfill the core anti-Hindu agenda of the Congress Party to reduce percentage of all categories of Hindus in government jobs, educational institutions and in trade and commerce. In furtherance of this conspiracy Hindus were under represented in composition of these two entities so that data could be easily cooked and manipulated. As representation of Hindus in the Sachar Committee and the Rangnath Mishra Commission were below their demographic strength, it is obvious that like the infamous Simon Commission these too lack democratic legitimacy and democratic weight. Newspapers are reporting that Hindus' percentage in job sector is falling but still many Hindus are not taking note of it. As per Hindustan Times of December 24, 2008 the Parliament was informed by the Congress Government that as a result of special efforts made by the UPA Government such as the Sachar Committee, PM's 15-Point Programme etc. the share of minorities in central sector jobs increased from 6.9 per cent in 2006-07 to 8.7 per cent in 2007-08. It increased from 7.6 per cent in 2006-07 in the financial sector (Banks, FIs, RBI) to 10.2 per cent; in the Armed Forces from 5.5 per cent to 8.9 per cent; and in the Railways from 2.7 per cent to 6.3 per cent during the same one year period. In a full page advertisement in the Hindustan Times (February 18, 2010) the Ministry of Minority Affairs claimed credit for increasing trend in recruitment of minorities in government and public sector undertakings from 8.23 per cent to 9.18 per cent in 2008-09 as a result of the UPA guidelines. These reports prove that percentage of Hindu Youth in job sector is declining and that the core agenda of the Congress Party to reduce Hindu percentage in government and public sector undertakings hook or by crook is materialising that too with help of Hindu voters. When I bring following facts to notice of educated Hindus most of them express shock on their being ignorant of these facts, and, blame media and Hindu politicians for this betrayal. But in my humble opinion Hindu voters are themselves responsible for this plight of their own and of their children who either abstain from voting or vote in favour of anti-Hindu parties like the Congress Party, JD(S), NCP, Communist parties, DMKs, TDP, Mayawati party, Mulayam Singh Yadav party and Lalu Yadav party etc. (1) Harm to serving Hindu civil servants and Hindu aspirants for civil services First let us look at the harm which the Misra Commission Report would inflict upon all serving Hindu civil servants and all those Hindus who aspire for civil service careers. Para 16.2.16 of the Misra Commission reads: "Since the minorities- especially the Muslims-are very much under-represented, and sometimes wholly unrepresented, in government employment, we recommend that they should be regarded as backward in this respect within the meaning of that term as used in Article 16 (4) of the Constitution-notably without qualifying the word 'backward' with the words "socially and educationally"-and that 15 per cent of posts in all cadres and grades under the Central and State Governments should be earmarked for them" The Misra Commission and Sachar Committee have made false claims that Muslims are under-represented in services. Supporters of Muslim reservation say that Muslims are about 13 per cent of population but in IAS etc their representation is about four per cent so there are under-represented in services so there should be reservation for them. Vide its own table 3.6 Misra Commission reports that graduation percentage of Muslims is only 3.6 per cent and as only graduates can aspire for public services percentage of Muslims in services at four per cent is fair and already more than commensurate to their graduation percentage. So claim of Muslims under representation is totally false. The Constitution of India as well as the Supreme Court have laid down that "social and educational" backwardness are essential to become eligible for getting reservation under Art 16(4). But Muslims as a community enjoy better literacy rate than Hindus in 11 states and better literacy rate than SC Hindus and ST Hindus on national level (Para 12.3 of Mishra and page 53 of Sachar) so they are not entitled for any reservation as they are not educationally backward. Muslims cannot be allowed to claim to be socially backwards as their ancestors ruled over India for many centuries. According to the 2001 Census, the Sachar Committee and the Misra Commission (table 3.5, paras 12.3, 18.5 etc) Christians have higher literacy rate (80 per cent) as compared to other religious minorities as well as the national literacy percentage of 65 per cent. Christians have higher literacy rate than Hindus. Christians have higher per capita income too. So Christians too cannot claim to be backward in any sense and thus Christians are debarred by Article 16(4) for any type of reservations. All the Hindu officers serving under the Central Government or any State Government should take note that the Misra Commission has recommended reservation of 15 per cent of posts for religious minorities in all cadres and in all grades under the Central and the State Governments. Ten per cent will be solely for Muslim officials/candidates and five per cent for other minorities. As per Hindustan Times report quoted above Hindus still held 91.7 per cent of jobs in the Central sector in 2006-07 but after the Misra Commission Report is implemented Hindus' promotional avenues will get restricted to 85 per cent of posts so the pace of their promotions will get further slowed with worsening stagnations. But minority officials who constituted only 8.3 per cent in 2006-07 in civil services will fill up 15 per cent of posts in the central sector i.e. pace of their promotions will become much faster than their Hindu batchmates. It is said that Muslims are about four per cent in services or wholly unrepresented but 10 per cent jobs in all cadres and grades are proposed to be reserved for them by Congress Party. It means that Muslim officers will have much faster pace of promotions vis-à-vis Hindu officers and will also occupy senior positions for longer periods than Hindu officers. Under para 16.3.5 the Misra Commission has recommended to confer Scheduled Caste status on what are known as dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims. If Muslims and Christians are added into SC quota they would take lion's share because of their higher literacy rate further disadvantaging SC Hindu candidates leaving SC Hindus more high and dry. (2) 15 per cent Shrinkage in educational seats for all Hindu students The Misra Commission Para 16.2.7 reads: "As by the force of judicial decisions the minority intake in minority educational institutions has, in the interest of national integration, been restricted to about 50 per cent, thus virtually earmarking the remaining 50 per cent or so for the majority community-we strongly recommend that, by the same analogy and for the same purpose, at least 15 per cent seats in all non-minority educational institutions should be earmarked by law for the minorities." As and when it (Mishra Commission) is implemented, Hindu students with marks better than minority candidates may start getting admissions refused even in Hindu institutions managed by Hindu organisations such as Vidya Bharati, DAV Colleges etc. Till now Hindu students with better marks than a minority student are getting admissions refused only in minority run institutions. At present, out of every 10,000 professional seats in non-minority institutions OBC Hindu students get 2700 seats reserved for them, 1500 seats for SC Hindus and 750 for ST Hindus. After Misra Report is implemented by Sonia Gandhi-Rahul Gandhi-Manmohan Singh 1500 seats would first get reserved for minority students, 27 per cent of remaining 8500 seats i.e. 1250 seats will be available for OBCs and 630 for STs. So mathematically speaking there shall be reduction of seats for all sections of Hindu students and all Hindu students irrespective of their political affiliations would suffer. (3) Merits of all Hindu youth ignored Hindu students with better marks are being denied admissions into nurseries, schools, colleges and universities run by minorities, whether aided out of taxes collected from we Hindus or unaided. Hindu youth are generally under-represented in the staff of minority institutions, and, posts of Principals etc. are generally reserved for non-Hindus. For example, the rule of St Stephan's College Delhi stipulates that a Hindu cannot be its Principal and Vice Principal though it receives annual grant of crores of rupees from the Government out of taxes collected from we Hindus. Hindu candidates with better CVs are generally denied jobs in these institutions. The minority institutions quote Supreme Court decisions to justify the second class treatment of all Hindu youth in matters of admission and employment. According to the Supreme Court Article 14 of the Constitution is not uniformly applicable everywhere and gets superseded by Article 29 and 30 in minority institutions. This is a flawed interpretation of Constitution by the Supreme Court which should be overturned like the Shah Bano case. (4) OBC, SC and ST Hindus denied Constitutional rights The Articles 15 and 16 guarantee 15 per cent reservations for SC Hindus and 7.5 per cent reservations for ST Hindus but they are denied these constitutionally guaranteed rights in admissions as well as in employment in all minority institutions. OBC Hindus have been given 27 per cent reservations in academic institutions but the Manmohan Singh Government has framed rules in such a way that OBC Hindus are denied this constitutionally guaranteed reservation all over India in all minority institutions.The point is that as the Constitution is in force on every square inch of India so these reservations must be available to SC, ST and OBC Hindus in all minority institutions all over India. (5) Student loans to Hindu students at higher interest rates Hindu students get student loans at higher interest rate of about 10 per cent per annum but minority students get student loan at three per cent per annum from the National Minority Development & Finance Corporation under the Union Ministry of Finance. For confirmation and more details please visit www.nmdfc.org. (6) Commercial loans to Hindus at higher interest rates Hindu youths get loans from commercial banks to start a new business at 15 per cent to 18 per cent interest and have to arrange 'margin money' of 15 per cent to 40 per cent of project cost from private sources, balance comes from the bank. But a minority youth has to put in only five per cent of project cost as margin money from his private source, other 35 per cent is given by the National Minority Development & Finance Corporation at three per cent interest, and remaining 60 per cent of finance is given by commercial banks at two percentage points less than general lending rate for Hindus. On March13, 2007 the then Finance Minister Chidambaram had told the Rajya Sabha that of the total priority sector lending, loans to minorities had increased by 33 per cent to Rs 45,490 crores on March 31, 2006 as against Rs 34,654 crores when the UPA Government took office in May 2004. In a full page advertisement in the HT, February 18, 2010 the Ministry of Minority Affairs informed that Rs 2,31,223 crores was advanced by public sector banks to minorities under the priority sector lending during April 2007 to December 31, 2009. Annual rate of growth of bank loans to minorities is much higher than growth rate of bank loans to Hindus. Hindus invite such ill-treatments of their own by giving their notes and votes to Sonia Gandhi-Rahul Gandhi. (7) Hindu students pay more fees at IITS, IIMS etc. The UPA Government has directed that all minority students admitted into 70 top institutions of India like IIMs, IITs etc will get their total fees paid by the Government but Hindu students, whether leftist or Rightist, whether North Indian or South Indian, whether member of NSUI or SFI or ABVP have to pay their full fees. If a minority student decides to join any coaching centre to prepare for admission into colleges or Public service examinations or jobs in government and private sectors he gets total fees of coaching centre paid by the government but a Hindu student or his parent has to pay the fees of coaching centre. Details of various schemes may be seen at www.minority affairs.gov.in. In a full page advertisement in the HT, February 18, 2010 the Ministry of Minority Affairs informed that Rs 20.75 crore was released for free coaching of 14,966 minority candidates during April 2006 to January1, 2010. (8) Hindus debarred for many posts under the state It may come as total surprise to many Hindus that there are many posts under the Government which are paid out of taxes collected from we Hindus but a Hindu howsoever liberal or Marxist he may be, he is legally debarred from holding such posts such as posts of the Chairman of National and Provincial Minority Commissions, Principals of St Stephan's Delhi (and similar minority institutions running into thousands and thousands all over India) etc. Section 4 of the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act 2004 passed by the Manmohan Singh Government stipulates that only persons from minority communities shall be eligible to be appointed as Chairman and members of this Commission. Hindus have been totally excluded from this Commission. It is like another Simon Commission. (9) All Hindu students living in rural areas disadvantaged by Congress Party vis-a-vis minority students In pursuance of the 2004 Congress manifesto, on March 10, 2006, the Lok Sabha passed the National Commission for Minority Educational (Amendment) Bill according to which the provincial governments will have to give no objection certificate within 90 days of application for setting up an institution by religious minorities, or, else the government will have to specify reasons for refusal. The aggrieved party will have right to approach the Commission which, in turn, will take a final decision in consultation with the State. However, if no reasons are given by a State government for not giving the NoC within 90 days, it would be deemed as the approval of the State. The Act also provides for the right of minority institutions to seek affiliation to any university of their choice listed in this Act. So, a Muslim or Christian institution in a far off place, say, Jhumari Talaian in Bihar can demand affiliation to any named central university of its choice and its students will get degrees of that central university and, thus, will enjoy better marketability in the employment market than Hindus as a Hindu student of the same region will have degree of a provincial university having less marketability in the employment market. (10) Communal DPCs To reduce percentage of Hindus and to increase the percentage of minorities in government sector the UPA government has ordered inclusion of minority members in all Selection Boards and Departmental Promotion Committees. All selection panels recruiting ten or more vacancies must have one member belonging to a minority community. This circular instructs to give special considerations to minorities in all appointments, so danger bell is ringing loud and clear for all Hindu job seekers whether they are leftists or rightists, whether upper caste or as in the Selection Panel there is at least one member with clear mandate to favour minority candidates. It is thus clear that as far as Hindus are concerned the Congress Party is actually the naukri-chchinwa party robbing all Hindu youth 15 per cent of jobs and educational seats. Hindus who do not want to harm career prospects of their own or of their children and grandchildren must never cast their votes in favour of Congress Party or Communist parties or any Jaichandi party.