Monday, July 7, 2014

Tibetans inherited Denisovan genes that helped them live in high altitudes.

 

Any news on Denisovans always attracts my attention. It is because I suspect them to be the inhabitants of Deva territory in a remote past. According to researchers Denisovans were short and they became extinct some 40,000 years ago. There are traces of their genes in Australians and Melanesians. This made them think that they were in the southern hemisphere in south-east parts of the globe. But the same gene imprints were found in the human remnants in Siberia, in Altai. This brings in the theory that they had moved from south to north or from north to south. The Wikipedia article on Denisovans has the following map showing the movement or spread of Denisovans in green colour.

 

 



Their period ended by 40,000 years before present. What strikes me in the current study is that a part of their gene is found in most Tibetans and that gene was found to be helping them to endure life in high altitudes where oxygen level is low. This makes me think whether Denisovans were also tuned to living in high altitudes. So far their presence in traces is found in people in Southeast Asia near the oceans. If they were supposed to have possessed a unique gene suitable for living in high altitudes, then it means their major habitat for many thousands of years must have been in high and cold regions.



This makes the mountains of Siberia as the perfect places for their natural habitat. This is where Uttarkuru was located according to Hindu texts and this is where Devas were supposed to have lived.  Let me reproduce a map with Uttar Kuru from my old article 24,000 year old remains of the Malta boy – connected to Indian gene pool?

 

 



Further details of my views of the people of Uttarkuru based on Hindu texts can be read here: Discovery of 30,000 year human imprint in Siberia, the land identified as Uttarkuru.

 

There are references of mix –up of Devas with others in the past. For example, Muruga aka Karthikeya, of the Tamil lands – presumably in deep down the south near Australia at the time of 1st Sangam, around 12,500 years ago married Devyani of the Deva territory.



Earlier Matali, the charioteer of Indra (there may have been many Indras as that seems to be the title of the king of Devas) came down to Southern hemisphere in search of a groom for his daughter. There is yet another instance narrated in Mahabharata of a girl from Southern hemisphere marrying a person from Deva territory.  Thus mix-up of people – seemingly with Denisovnas had happened. (Some Denisovans must have lived until 7000 years ago if my theorising of equating Denisovans with Devas is correct. The last time we hear about Devas was when Indrajit, son of Ravana over powered Indra.)



In this backdrop, the news about a Denisovan gene called as super- athlete gene being present in Tibetans that make them survive in low oxygen and generate more haemoglobin make me think that Denisovan habitat must have been in cold and high altitudes. The displacement of people from Altai to Vietnam via China which was allegorically explained in Anusasana parva – chapter 93) was perhaps the last time people from there shifted to south owing to climatic conditions. It is probable a branch of them shifted to Tibetan heights owing to the similarity in earlier habitat but lost forever later, leaving some imprints through mix-up.



 

Others who shifted towards south could not have survived owing to sea level habitat.

Waiting for more research results on Denisovans.

 

****************

From

http://www.sci-news.com/genetics/science-tibetans-super-athlete-gene-denisovans-02038.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BreakingScienceNews+%28Breaking+Science+News%29

 

Tibetans Inherit Super-Athlete Gene from Denisovans


Tibetans were able to adapt to high altitudes thanks to what is sometimes called the super-athlete gene, or more prosaically, EPAS1, they acquired when their ancestors bred with Denisovans – a mysterious group of prehistoric hominins that went extinct around 45,000 years ago.


 

Genetic researchers have found that part of the EPAS1 gene in Tibetans is almost identical to the gene in Denisovans. Image credit: Mauro Cutrona.

 

EPAS1 is activated when oxygen levels in the blood drop, triggering production of more hemoglobin. This gene has been referred to as the super-athlete gene because at low elevations, some variants of it help athletes quickly boost hemoglobin and thus the oxygen-carrying capacity of their blood, upping endurance.


An unusual variant of EPAS1 became widespread in Tibetans after they moved onto the high-altitude plateau several thousand years ago. This variant allowed them to survive despite low oxygen levels at elevations of 4,500 meters or more.


"We have very clear evidence that this version of the gene came from Denisovans. This shows very clearly and directly that humans evolved and adapted to new environments by getting their genes from another species," said Prof Rasmus Nielsen of the University of California, Berkeley, who is the senior author of a paper published in the journal Nature.


For their study, Prof Nielsen' team sequenced the EPAS1 gene in 40 Tibetans and 40 Han Chinese individuals.


The data revealed that the high-altitude variant of EPAS1 is so unusual that it could only have come from Denisovans. Aside from its low frequency in Han Chinese, it occurs in no other known humans, not even Melanesians whose genomes are nearly 5 percent Denisovan.


The variant (or allele) of EPAS1 found in Tibetans raises hemoglobin and red blood cell levels only slightly at high elevations, avoiding the side effects seen in most people who relocate to elevations above 4,000 meters.

"We found that part of the EPAS1 gene in Tibetans is almost identical to the gene in Denisovans and very different from all other humans. We can do a statistical analysis to show that this must have come from Denisovans. There is no other way of explaining the data," Prof Nielsen said.


Prof Nielsen described a possible scenario leading to this result: "modern humans coming out of Africa interbred with Denisovan populations in Eurasia as they passed through that area into China, and their descendants still retain a small percentage – perhaps 0.1 percent – of Denisovan DNA."

"The group that invaded China eventually split, with one population moving into Tibet and the other, now known as Han Chinese, dominating the lower elevations."


Prof Nielsen added: "there might be many other species from which we also got DNA, but we don't know because we don't have the genomes."

"The only reason we can say that this bit of DNA is Denisovan is because of this lucky accident of sequencing DNA from a little bone found in a cave in Siberia. We found the Denisovan species at the DNA level, but how many other species are out there that we haven't sequenced?"


Emilia Huerta-Sánchez et al. Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature, published online July 02, 2014; doi: 10.1038/nature13408

 

****************



From

http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.in/2014/07/extinct-human-cousin-gave-tibetans.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+TheArchaeologyNewsNetwork+%28The+Archaeology+News+Network%29#.U7o4CbE5ez4

 

Extinct human cousin gave Tibetans advantage at high elevation

Tibetans were able to adapt to high altitudes thanks to a gene picked up when their ancestors mated with a species of human they helped push to extinction, according to a new report by University of California, Berkeley, scientists. Extinct human cousin gave Tibetans advantage at high elevation

Tibetans were able to adapt to high altitudes thanks to a gene picked up when their ancestors mated with a species of human they helped push to extinction, according to a new report by University of California, Berkeley, scientists. Extinct human cousin gave Tibetans advantage at high elevation


A Chinese researcher collects a blood sample from an ethnic Tibetan man participating in the DNA study [Credit: Beijing Genomics Institute]

 

An unusual variant of a gene involved in regulating the body's production of hemoglobin -- the molecule that carries oxygen in the blood -- became widespread in Tibetans after they moved onto the high-altitude plateau several thousand years ago. This variant allowed them to survive despite low oxygen levels at elevations of 15,000 feet or more, whereas most people develop thick blood at high altitudes, leading to cardiovascular problems. "We have very clear evidence that this version of the gene came from Denisovans," a mysterious human relative that went extinct 40,000-50,000 years ago, around the same time as the more well-known Neanderthals, under pressure from modern humans, said principal author Rasmus Nielsen, UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology.

 

 "This shows very clearly and directly that humans evolved and adapted to new environments by getting their genes from another species." This is the first time a gene from another species of human has been shown unequivocally to have helped modern humans adapt to their environment, he said. Nielsen and his colleagues at BGI-Shenzhen in China will report their findings online July 2 in advance of publication in the journal Nature.

 

The gene, called EPAS1, is activated when oxygen levels in the blood drop, triggering production of more hemoglobin. The gene has been referred to as the superathlete gene because at low elevations, some variants of it help athletes quickly boost hemoglobin and thus the oxygen-carrying capacity of their blood, upping endurance. At high altitude, however, the common variants of the gene boost hemoglobin and its carrier, red blood cells, too much, increasing the thickness of the blood and leading to hypertension and heart attacks as well as low-birth-weight babies and increased infant mortality. The variant or allele found in Tibetans raises hemoglobin and red blood cell levels only slightly at high elevation, avoiding the side-effects seen in most people who relocate to elevations above 13,000 feet.

 

"We found part of the EPAS1 gene in Tibetans is almost identical to the gene in Denisovans and very different from all other humans," Nielsen said. "We can do a statistical analysis to show that this must have come from Denisovans. There is no other way of explaining the data." Harsh conditions on Tibetan plateau The researchers first reported the prevalence of a high-altitude version of EPAS1 in Tibetans in 2010, based on sequencing of the genomes of numerous Han Chinese and Tibetans.

 

Nielsen and his colleagues argued that this was the result of natural selection to adapt to about 40 percent lower oxygen levels on the Tibetan plateau. That is, people without the variant died before reproducing at a much higher rate than those with it. About 87 percent of Tibetans now have the high-altitude version, compared to only 9 percent of Han Chinese, who have the same common ancestor as Tibetans. Nielsen and his colleagues subsequently sequenced the EPAS1 gene in an additional 40 Tibetans and 40 Han Chinese. The data revealed that the high-altitude variant of EPAS1 is so unusual that it could only have come from Denisovans. Aside from its low frequency in Han Chinese, it occurs in no other known humans, not even Melanesians, whose genomes are nearly 5 percent Denisovan.

 

A high quality sequence of the Denisovan genome was published in 2012. Nielsen sketched out a possible scenario leading to this result: modern humans coming out of Africa interbred with Denisovan populations in Eurasia as they passed through that area into China, and their descendants still retain a small percentage -- perhaps 0.1 percent -- Denisovan DNA. The group that invaded China eventually split, with one population moving into Tibet and the other, now known as Han Chinese, dominating the lower elevations. He and his colleagues are analyzing other genomes to pin down the time of Denisovan interbreeding, which probably happened over a rather short period of time. "There might be many other species from which we also got DNA, but we don't know because we don't have the genomes," Nielsen said.


"The only reason we can say that this bit of DNA is Denisovan is because of this lucky accident of sequencing DNA from a little bone found in a cave in Siberia. We found the Denisovan species at the DNA level, but how many other species are out there that we haven't sequenced?" Author: Robert Sanders | Source: University of California - Berkeley [July 02, 2014]


 

Ramalakshmi’s fight against non-vegetarianism in Govt functions.


A rare and unusual news was reported a few days ago which I think had gone unnoticed. It was about a woman named Ms Ramalakshmi who went to court seeking a direction to put a stop to on serving non-vegetarian food in the Government functions. The money used comes from tax-payers. Many of the tax payers would not have relished the idea of their hard earned money going to kill life to find its final destination in some one's stomach. As such it is not right to use that money to kill life and serve as food. This is her line of argument.


The court accepted her argument and directed the Govt of Tamilnadu to stop serving non-veg food in govt functions. This was in 2012. The Govt too accepted it. But this practice had not stopped. Hence the present petition by the woman. It must be noted that the court had appreciated the substance of this argument and allowed her to propagate non-vegetarianism. 


Two instances were recalled by me on reading this news. One was the decision by Reliance people (Ambanis) to stop the sale of non-veg food  in their food outlets, after the share holders raised an objection to their money going into killing life.

Another one was a recorded version from an Austrian traveller of the 18th century where he said that animals were not killed for any purpose in India. To quote his words "Their (Indians) total abstinence from all flesh, and the express prohibition of their religion which forbids them to kill animals, prevent them from dissecting them and examining their internal constitution." ( 'Birth and education of children" Book II, by Fra Parlino Da Bartalomeo who was in India between 1776 to 1789)


This shows that non vegetarianism was not in vogue in India. Even onion and garlics were not consumed by people as early as the 6th century according to Fa Hien's chronicles. But some Tamils may quote Sangam Tamil texts that speak about people killing and eating animals. In Patthu pattu such descriptions are found. But one must know that those are about people living in remote areas of the forest and mountains where food is not available there is not much scope to raise vegetarian food. Side by side descriptions do exist in those texts of the Vegetarian food consumed in townships. The other contexts on consumption of non veg pertain to warriors eating non veg food.


But Tamil lands and India as a whole had come a long way after the end of monarchy. For quite long vegetarianism had come to stay with increasing spiritual awareness among the masses. "Ahimsa paramO dharmah" is the dictum told in Mahabharata. Killing for reasons other than Yajna purpose was never allowed, says Chandogya Upanishad. Krishna had elaborately articulated the effect of different types of food in our body and mind in Bhagavad Gita. He insists on the need to stick to vegetarian food for spiritual progress.


Until the 18th century all Indians were steeped in spiritual ideas and hence practiced abstention from non-vegetarianism. Though things have changed after Colonial invasion, things have worsened in the past few decades. In this scenario, Ms Ramalakshmi's efforts are truly brave and welcome.


For long I have wanted to write elaborately on textual sources on Vegetarianism but could not. I welcome articles on this to be posted as separate blogs here.

***************

From Times of India
Woman takes fight against non-veg food to High Court.

A woman from Uthangudi has returned to the Madurai bench of the Madras high court reviving her fight against non-vegetarian food being served at government functions.

"Serving non-vegetarian food at government functions should be stopped.
The functions are organised with taxpayers' money, including that of lakhs of people practice vegetarianism.

Their money should not be used to kill living creatures," said Ramalakshmi,
She cited Article 51(A) (g) of the Constitution, which says having compassion for all living creatures is a fundamental duty of every citizen. She made a representation to the government on December 29, 2011. As it was not considered, she took the matter to the high court, which appreciated her attempt, but said on July 8, 2012 that it was a policy decision to be taken by the government. The court allowed her to propagate the idea, following which she organized demonstrations and public meetings. A year later the government accepted her request in a communication dated March 12, 2013.

However, non-vegetarian food was served at the conference of collectors and police officers in Chennai on December 11 last year.

"The matter was reported in all prominent news dailies. Upon seeing them, I was deeply disappointed," she said. "We are not interfering with an individual's food habits but when a public function is organised with public funds, the sentiments of lakhs of people cannot be ignored," Ramalakshmi said.

When the matter came up before Justice R Subbiah, her counsel M Kannan said the earlier decision to serve only vegetarian food at government functions might have not been conveyed to all officials. The judge directed additional government pleader N S Karthikeyan to get instructions from the government and adjourned the matter.

*********

From


Plea filed seeking to direct Tamil Nadu govt for issuing circular to depts on veg food

Madurai: A petition seeking to direct Tamil Nadu government to issue a circular to all its departments regarding the policy decision that only vegetarian food could be served at government functions was filed before the Madras High Court bench here.

Justice R Subbiah directed the counsel for the government to get instructions on the matter and posted the case for next week.


The petitioner E Ramalakshmi, a follower of Saint Ramalinga Adigalar, a proponent of "Jeevakarunyam" (compassion to all living beings) submited that the Director of Tamil Development had informed her on March 12 last year that her representation to serve only vegetarian food during government functions had been accepted by the government as a policy.

She said she came to know from media reports that non-vegetarian food was served during the Collectors' and Police Officers' conference at Chennai on December 11 last year, which was against the policy decision.

Ramalakshmi said she was "deeply disappointed and depressed" that the Chief Secretary had not chosen to implement the policy decision and intimate about it to various departments and sought the court's intervention in the matter.


Related articles:

Animal sacrifice – how Veda Dharma views it?

Non- violent silk in Vedic times?

Kali or Durga and their sub-deities as indicated by planets.

The following was written by me in the comment section of the previous article


Sai Baba – Shankaracharya controversy.

I am picking out the part on Kali or Durga and the sub-deities and posting here for easy search and reading. The source is Prasna Marga.



Image of Kali from Colonial records.


Sun:

In the signs of Venus, Sun represents Yakshi in Taurus and Bhadrakali in Libra.
Sun in Saturn's sign of Capricorn represents Ayyappa.

It represents hunter's deities in Pisces, the sign of Jupiter. Hunter's deity is Mahishasuramardhini. Read my blog here: http://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.in/2011/10/durga-puja-has-early-traces-in-tamil.html

Moon:

In the Martian sign of Aries, if moon is posited, it represents temple God Chamundi.

In Scorpio, it represents the same Goddess worshiped by low class people. If weak in these signs, both types of deities.

In the sign of Venus, Moon represents Yakshi in Taurus.

In the signs of Mercury, Moon represents Vimana Sundara in Gemini and Vimana Sundari in Virgo.

In Leo, Moon represents Bhagawathi worshiped by others.

In Pisces, Moon represents Akasa Gandharva female.


Mars:

Usually Mars signifies Subramanya in odd signs and Chamundi and Bhadrakali in even signs. Further fine-tuning can be explained as follows with specific reference to Kaali- group deities.

In its own sign of Scorpio, Mars represents Narabhojini, Balaprabhakshani etc.

In Taurus and Virgo, Yakshi.

In Cancer, Bhagawathi and Chamundi.

In Leo, vana devathas in addition to Shiva Bhuthas such as Aghora.


Mercury:


In Leo, Mercury signifies Naga kanya.

In Sagittarius and Pisces, Chamundi charged with mischief by an angered Brahmin.


Jupiter:

In the signs of Venus, Jupiter represents Yakshi in Taurus and Yaksha in Libra.


Venus:

In its own houses (Taurus and Libra) Venus signifies Annapurna.

In the house of a benefic, it signifies Lakshmi.

In Leo, it indicates temple Yakshi.

In Pisces, Durga Bhagawathi.

In other signs, Yakshi.


Saturn:

In the signs of Venus, it signifies Yakshi in Taurus and Ayyappa in Libra.

In Gemini, Vana devatha.

In cancer, devathas worshiped by low class people.

In Leo, devathas worshiped by hunters in addition to temple Sastha and Kirata.




Friday, July 4, 2014

Sai Baba – Shankaracharya controversy.


சொன்னால் விரோதம்இது, ஆகிலும் சொல்லுவன் கேண்மினோ!

 

A controversy has erupted over the comments of Dwaraka Shankaracharya on Shirdi Sai Baba. Things seem to be escalating with Baba devotees going to court and Naga sadhus coming to defend the Shankaracharya who is facing a vilification campaign by Hindus and Bharatheeya writers. In my opinion  this controversy was waiting to happen and it had happened now. With heavy commercialisation of bhakthi happening on one side and the growth of neo-Hindus on the other, who see themselves as revivalists and guards of Hinduism and think that they know Hinduism better than even the Shankaracharya, this issue was waiting to explode. What the Shankaracharya had said may have been new to neo-Hindus, but not many seemed to realise that he did not say anything new or different from what the numerous acharyas around India had been saying to their devotees. The only difference is that Dwaraka Shankaracharya had been more vociferous and his views were reported widely. Perhaps the high rate of depletion of Hindus from traditional practices in North India had an impact on the Acharya.

 

True to the tradition that he has to uphold, Dwaraka Shankaracharya has denounced the worship of anyone other than Rama or Krishna. Similarly any Shaivite acharya of Tamilnadu, would expect his followers to worship only Shiva. Any Vaishnavite acharya or acharyas of Madhwa sampradaya would expect their followers to follow their traditional Gods and not others. One may find fault with this trend saying that Hinduism is divisive and narrow minded. No, what these acharyas are saying is in tune with any one of the Shanmathas which ultimately lead one to the Brahman. These acharyas have the duty to uphold the tradition that they are expected to safeguard and preserve. All the six groups of deities of the Shanmatha are the manifestation of the all pervading Brahman and anyone following one of them can attain Brahman through the path he had taken. The fact of the matter is that Shirdi Sai Baba does not come under any of the Shanmatha concepts.

 

As if to overcome this, Baba devotees have started telling that he is an incarnation of Shiva. Some people say that he is an incarnation of Dattatreya. If all these spinning are acceptable why leave out Jesus who is described by his devotees as Purusha of Purusha Suktha ? It is a matter of acceptability by Hindus, one may argue. But one must remember that our ancestors did not even accept a Buddha or a Mahaveera as Hindu deities though they sprang from Hindu Thought. Buddha was initially regarded as an avatar of Vishnu due to his Godly attributes as those of Vishnu. But he was removed from the list of avatars of Vishnu when it came to be known that his ideas did not align with the Vedic concept. Those questioning the Shankaracharya must probe why Buddha and Mahaveera were severely rejected by all acharyas, azhwars and nayanmars. They must also probe whether they (Acharyas, aazhwars etc) would accept Sai Baba as a Hindu God if they are living now.

 

Looking on those lines, accepting Shirdi Sai Baba as a Guru by Hindus raises some basic questions. A Guru is one who not only removes the darkness of ignorance but also connects a devotee to God. A Guru is essentially a medium between a person and God. Which God is being shown by Sai Baba as the object of ultimate realisation?  Are any of the deities of Shanmatha or their parivar deities pointed out by Sai Baba as a Guru to the Hindu devotees? In the absence of this, what people are doing by extolling him as Shiva or Dattareya are attempts at cult-formation and giving a Hindu status to him.

 

Giving a status as a Hindu Guru and Hindu deity to Sai Baba has no basis in the Hindu concept of deification. One may argue that numerous men and women who had lived or died for some cause had been deified as rural or local Gods in the past. So what is wrong in deifying Sai Baba who lived like a saint? It is replied here that the Godhead of those men and women were aligned with or as some parivar of one of the Shanmatha deities based on the attributes exhibited by them. Such deities were not elevated as main deities either. Even the Gurus of the Hindu fold who are worshiped are shown as subservient to the God who they worshiped and not as Gods themselves. But what is happening in the case of Sai Baba is that he is being elevated as Shiva which has the potential to mis-guide Hindus into believing what he is originally not. There were many siddhas in the Hindu cult who gained extraordinary powers through their meditation and did miracles. Even they were not elevated on par with Shiva.

 

Moreover there is the concept of 'Tatkratu" discussed in Brahma Sutras (4-3-14). Brahma Sutras are one among the three texts of authority for Hindu Thought. (The other two are Upansihads and Bhagavad Gita). It speaks about the ways to reach Brahman. In that context it talks about the law of Tatkratu which means that one becomes what one meditates upon. Of the different objects of meditation, only the meditation on one's own atman and the Paramatman (Brahman) make one attain Brahman-hood or Liberation. All the other objects of meditation land one into those objects. For example meditations on Sun as done in Madhu vidya makes one reach or attain Sun God. In the same way meditation on any entity would make one reach that entity upon death.

 

Among the deities only Shiva and Vishnu are identified as objects of Liberation from the cycle of birth. Description of them along with the concept of Tatkratu can be read in Tamil here.  Worshipers of the Parivara devatas of these two Gods get elevated gradually over births and attain Moksha through either of these two deities. By this concept of Hindu Thought the devotees of deities of the other religions attain those deities which are anyway confined to created world, caught within the cycle of rebirth. The reason is that those religions have no idea of Brahman. In the similar vein, the devotion to Sai Baba would be limited by the rule of Tatkrutu. Any attempt to elevate him as Shiva would not benefit the devotee as Sai Baba was not connected with Shiva or Brahman in his life. With the goal of Sanatana Dharma being that of enabling one obtain the highest fruit of human endeavour, no one in the know of this knowledge would recommend a deviation from this path.

 

However, material quest and the urge for quick-fix solutions had overtaken people nowadays which are precisely the cause for deviating from the Hindu path. This has reached the heights of ignorance that people can be seen abusing the Shankaracharya without any thought. I do agree that people have all the liberty to pursue their own choice in seeking guidance from any person and worship him or her. But do they know what they are missing in the melee? 


 

Related article:


Many Gods of Hinduism - http://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.in/2013/07/pralaya-in-kedarnath-some-musings-part_23.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

The phenomenal growth Maharaja NGOs.

 

FOREIGN FUNDING AND THE MAHARAJAS AMONG NGOS

July 2, 2014

by

Prof Vaidyanathan

Professor of Finance, IIM, Bangalore.
 

  //A category of NGOs are registered with Ministry of Home Affairs -under Foreign contributions regulations Act [ FCRA] –These can be called Euro or Dollar NGOs  who get funds from private charities as well as Government organizations abroad.//

It is speculated that a big portion of this money goes to politicians and bureaucracy as a large number of institutes are owned, controlled and managed by politicians and business houses

India is a fascinating country. The number of stock exchanges we have, as per official records is 20, but the number of functioning exchanges is only two. The number of scrips listed on the Bombay Stock Exchanges [BSE] is nearly 9,000, only 3500 of these are traded at least once a year, and the top 50 securities constitute nearly two-third of the turnover. Actually only 250 to 300 are "active" traded scrips. Interestingly, the latest Handbook of Statistics on Indian Securities Market published by the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has dropped the column for number of scrips listed on the BSE! It is one way to solve the issue of numbers.

In a similar fashion, we decided to probe the number of not-for-profit or non-governmental organisations (NGO) in India. Being in the teaching line, we have the habit of probing issues that are otherwise not to be probed at all! Let sleeping dogs lie is the national dictum in such matters.

NGOs are also known as Voluntary Organizations (VOs) or Voluntary Agencies (VAs) and more recently as Voluntary Development Organizations (VDOs), Non-Governmental Development Organizations (NGDOs) or Non-Profit Institutions (NPIs). There are equivalent names for NGOs available in different Indian languages. In Hindi NGOs are called Swayamsevi Sansthayen or Swayamsevi Sangathan.

Prior to the enactment of the Societies Registration Act of 1860, voluntary action was guided mainly by religious and cultural ethos. Subsequently, a series of legislations addressing the non-profit sector were promulgated. The starting point in this respect was Article 19 of the Indian Constitution which recognized a number of civic rights including the right "….to form associations or unions". It constitutes the legal basis of relevant legal provisions applicable to the non-profit sector. There are also non mandatory provisions that allow any group with the intention of starting a non-profit, voluntary or charitable work to organize itself into a legally registered entity. However, given the optional nature of these provisions, there is a large group of voluntary bodies that are not registered.

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) India and the UN Volunteers (UNV) programme had organized a Forum in January 2006 at UNDP's Delhi office to discuss the issues relating to implementation of the UN Handbook on Non-profit Institutions (NPIs) in the System of National Accounts in India.

  The meeting was attended by representatives of the Planning Commission, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI), NGOs, UNV Headquarters, and the Centre for Civil Society Studies of Johns Hopkins University, which is leading the effort to implement the UN NPI Handbook throughout the World.

  At this Forum, the UN Resident Coordinator and UNDP India Resident Representative stressed the need to implement the UN Handbook in order to capture the contribution of NPIs to the national economy. It was mentioned that the voluntary sector played a significant role in the economic and social change of the country and contributed significantly to the development in both rural and urban areas. The Forum therefore urged that India should take suitable steps to implement the UN Handbook on NPIs and compile accounts of NPIs functioning in the country.

The National Policy on the Voluntary Sector, adopted in May 2007, presumably under the guidance of the National Advisory Council, pledges to encourage, enable and empower an independent, creative and effective voluntary sector, with diversity in form and function, so that it can contribute to the social, cultural and economic advancement of the people of India. It constitutes the beginning of a process to evolve a new working relationship between the government and the voluntary sector, without affecting the autonomy and identity of voluntary organizations (GoI/Planning Commission, 2007). Accordingly, it is expected that the enabling environment will be further enhanced to encourage the development and active engagement of the non-profit sector, including volunteerism, in the community's affairs and developmental efforts.

So we can conclude that at the beginning of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA)'s second term, the so called voluntary or NGO sector was fully ensconced in decision making and fund collecting activities.

Read the rest of the article in Prof Vaidyanathan's blog here :-
http://prof-vaidyanathan.com/2014/07/02/foreign-funding-and-the-maharajas-among-ngos/

 


Related articles:-


Christian money that is sent to invade the Hindu space.

Foreign funding of the NGOs – a threat to growth and national security.