Showing posts with label Karunanidhi's forays into Hinduism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Karunanidhi's forays into Hinduism. Show all posts

Monday, May 9, 2016

Anti- Hindu features in the DMK Manifesto



Anti- Hindu sentiment is in the DNA of the DMK party. The famous quotable quote of Mr Karunanidhi is the one characterizing the Hindus as thieves. Probably this view made him think that he can steal from the Hindus for after all they are all thieves! An instance of this mentality is seen in some of the poll promises given by the DMK in its election manifesto 2016.

Article 344 of this manifesto talks about the creation of "Arignar Anna Unavagam" which is obviously a replacement for Amma canteens that are popular with common man. The Amma Unavagam (canteen) is supported by the allocation from Chennai Corporation. The DMK wants to run the proposed Anna canteens with the support of HR & CE (Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department). Though NGOs and corporates are mentioned as other sources of fund for sustaining these canteens, what right the DMK has to lay its hands on the funds of HR & CE?


The Tamil version is given below.


This scheme will be under the direct supervision of the Chief Minister, says the manifesto. One can't imagine to what an extent Karunanidhi or Stalin as CM would go if they get a free hand with the Hindu temple funds!

Karunanidhi's anti Hindu propaganda and denouncement  of Hindu Gods is very well known and had continued for all these years. Recently I happen to see a photograph of his daughter Kanimozhi taking part in a DK meeting held to criticize the practice of carrying fire pot in Amman temple festivals.



The DMK's anti Hindu stance is also seen in its promise of reviving Sethu Samudram Project. The manifesto says that the project has been hampered by "reactionary forces"



The most damning feature against Hindus is seen in its promise to set up a committee to look into demands of long time occupants of temple lands to get such lands in their names. The English version of the manifesto refers to such occupants as those offering to purchase such lands. But the Tamil version does not make any such reference. It just says enabling them get the land registered in their names.





Temple lands are not poromboke lands. Even if such occupants are asking for transfer of the land in their name, where is the place for an arbitrator there? The deal is between the temple authorities and the occupants.  Already it is a well known fact that there are many illegal occupations of temple lands and where there are legal occupants, the rentals are very low, at the rates fixed many decades ago. The ideal way is to restore the lands to the temple and / or increase the rentals to the current rates.

The real face of the DMK can be known only when we read that part of the manifesto pertaining to the properties of Minority religious bodies. The manifesto says that the properties of Wakf Board will be recovered from encroachments and protected.



If it is Wakf property, the occupants must be removed. But if it is temple property, help the occupants to keep it for themselves. If it is temple fund, Karunanidhi himself will be there in his capacity as the Chief Minister to grab the funds! That is the essence of the DMK manifesto.


Update on 13-05-2016:

நெற்றியில் இட்ட குங்குமத்தை அழித்த ஸ்டாலின் |


Thursday, December 10, 2015

# Chennai floods – who is responsible for it?

El Nino is a modern term but our land of ancient Tamils had always experienced heavy rains in the solar months of Aippasi and Karthigai. This is made out from the adage “Aippasiyil adai mazhai, Karthigaiyil Gana mazhai”( ஐப்பசியில் அடைமழை, கார்த்திகையில் கனமழை).

 The Paripaadal verse on Pavai Nonbu (verse no 11) describes a scene of flood ravaged land that comes to house smaller water bodies called “KuLam” by the time the month of Margazhi begins. For this reason the month of Margazhi was also known as  “KuLam” (குளம்).

Our ancestors have laid a fantastic system of hydrology to channelize the flood waters and also to store the excess water for use in dry months. This network can be depicted as below.


(Note: Click on the pictures to see enlarged version)



The network comprises of River water overflowing into subsequent and smaller water bodies.
River > Lakes (Yeri) > KaNmai > KaraNai > Thaangal > Yenthal > OoraNi > KuLam > Kuttai.

These names themselves show that Pazhavanthaangal and Vedanthaangal were water bodies once. Even now there are some street names as Thaangal street in different parts of Chennai. It means there was once a water body adjacent to that street.

The topography and hydrology of Chennai is such that Chennai is a low lying area with an average elevation of only 6.7 metres above the mean sea level, with many parts of it actually at sea level. This landscape of Chennai makes it a marshy land that drains rain water into the adjacent sea. Chennai was indeed dotted with numerous tanks and lakes as per old maps of the British. Agricultural activity was going on at that time supported by these tanks.

The oldest map that I could get from a Google search was of 1893. It shows a long semi curved tank spanning in between Coovum river and Adyar river. (Below)



At that time this tank was identified at two places (in the map) as Nungambakkam tank and Mylapur tank.  The ‘Long Tank Regatta’ was held in 1893 “on the fine expanse of water that starts from the Cathedral Corner (once where Gemini Studio’s property was) to Sydapet”.

The southern end of this tank is linked to Adyar river near Saidapet. The map of 1914 gives clear details of this tank which by then acquired the name “Long Tank”. The inset in the 1914 map (below) shows that this link between Long tank and Adyar river is man-made. This must have existed much before the British came. This is the proof of how our ancients thoughtfully connected the waterways and the drainage system.


The Vyasar padi tank in this map was also a huge one at that time. But it is missing at present. The Vyasarpadi Tank was one of the most important tanks of Chennai along with 9 other tanks namely Perambur, Peravallur, Madavakkam, Chetput, Spur, Nungambakkam, Mylapore/Mambalam, Kottur and Kalikundram. All of them have vanished now.

The first official encroachment of water bodies in Madras started in 1923 with the plan to reclaim land from the Long Tank. The party that was in power at that time was none other than the root cause of the Dravidian ideology namely the Justice Party. The party that was unambiguously based on anti-Brahmanism and atheism and had brain washed the masses with a non-existent Dravida ideology found no qualms in destroying a major water source of Madras.  

Reclamation of land from this tank was started from 1930 by the same Justice Party, to create the Mambalam Housing Scheme on 1600 acres that gave rise to Theagaroya Nagar or T. Nagar (named after the founder of Justice Party).  Destruction of hydro system in the name of development was started by these Dravidian ideologists.

From 1941 onwards, further reclamation was done in Nungambakkam. At the westernmost end of the Tank, 54 acres were reclaimed for the Loyola College campus.

In 1974 what was left of the Tank was reclaimed to give the city the Valluvar Kottam campus alongside Tank Bund Road by none other than Karunanidhi

It must be noted that Valluvar Kottam was constructed right at the deepest part of the Long Tank. Old timers recall that for many years and year after year, Valluvar Kottam was water logged during the rainy season. It would have been apt had they named it as Valluvar Ottam or Valluvar Theppam (Float)!

The following map is that of Chennai today. The location of the missing Long Tank (rough sketch)  is shown in the next map.




The Long Tank formed the western boundary of Madras of those years. The Mount road was laid to the east of it. Today’s Mambalam, Mylapore, Panagal Park, Nungambakkam etc were built on this Tank. No wonder when Adyar river overflowed, the waters found their natural slopes in these areas in the recent floods.

A map drawn  65 years ago shows a sprinkle of numerous water bodies such as Yeris and Kulams all over present day Chennai. They were also well connected to drain extra water in times of flood. This map is shown below.

The gray areas are the water bodies which would remain dry in summer but can house rain water in the rainy season.


Today the gray areas are all closed down with habitations. Needless to say why most parts of Chennai is water logged even by short spell of rains.

The presently available water bodies –from among the network in the above map - are shown in the picture below.



In a good monsoon year, where will the rain water go? All the gray areas become water logged.


A compilation of reports on areas of Chennai which were once water bodies or drainage canals.

·         Two main rivers Cooum and Adayar cross Chennai.  Chennai’s periphery once hosted a massive wetland, which provided a natural flood control barrier in the past.

·         Adyar, Cooum, Kosasthaliyar and the man-made Buckingham canal are the macro drainages. They have a huge capacity to carry flood waters which is by now reduced to half the capacity due to encroachments.




·         The river Coovum which was once a fresh water source is now reduced to a massive, stinking sewer heaped with the waste generated by a heaving metropolis.




·         Similarly, rampant encroachment and urbanisation in its upstream reaches has sapped the ability of the Adyar river to carry flood water.

·         Another key waterway, the Buckingham Canal, is also choked with silt and sewage. So, when Chennai floods, there aren’t enough unobstructed channels for the water to get out.

·         Around eight medium drainage canals drain in to these rivers. These are the Otteri Nallah, Virugambakkam canal, Arumbakkam canal, Kodungaiyur canal, Captain Cotton canal, Velachery canal, Veerangal Odai and Mambalam canal. They are all missing now.

·         Two decades ago, Chennai had  650 water bodies—including big lakes, ponds and storage tanks.  The current number stands at around 27, according to the NIDM study. Even those water bodies that have managed to survive are much smaller than before. For instance, the total area of 19 major lakes in the city has nearly halved from 1,130 hectares to about 645 hectares.

·         Other water bodies such as Ullagaram, Adambakkam, Thalakanacheri, Mogappair and Senneerkuppam are considered beyond restoration. In the case of water channels like inlet and outlet they have completely disappeared

·         There are about 3000 tanks and ponds big and small in the Chennai area. Some of the important tanks are Madipakkam, Velachery, Thoraipakkam, Pallavaram, Madambakkam, Maraimalainagar, Kilkattalai, Pallikaranai, Adhambakkam, Puzhudhivakkam, Thalakanancheri, Kovilambakkam, Chitlapakkam and so on. These tanks can be classified as ENDANGERED.

·         The Adambakkam Lake is being closed due to the Metro Rail work and a concretised road leading from Velachery to GST Road is being built.

·         Madipakkam Lake has become a dumping yard for garbage and the water is not fit for any use. And on the other side construction of buildings is going on apace.



·          Puzhudhivakkam Lake was once an important reservoir and used to host a number of rare birds. This valuable natural resource has now been gradually converted into a housing colony. Inundation in Puzhudhivakkam and Madipakkam is caused by the disappearance of the Veerangal Odai which connects the Adambakkam and the Pallikaranai marsh.



·         Chitlapakkam Lake was once the water source for the Sembakkam and Hastinapuram villages. The total area of this lake is 86.86 acres which has subsequently shrunk to 47 acres due to encroachments such as the development of the district court, bus terminal and the Tambaram taluk office.

·         Chitlapakkam lake is getting water through 3 channels from the foothills. However, in this region the water table level is higher than in other areas. This lake is further contaminated by household sewage and waste from commercial establishments.

·         Chennai, Thiruvallur, Kancheepuram and Chengalpattu are hydrologically integrated. As per the tank memoir prepared by the British, there are 3,600 tanks in these districts and the surplus from around 20 tanks have also contributed to inflow in Chembarambakkam. All these have been encroached now.

·         Pallikaranai marshlands, which drains water from a 250 square kilometre catchment, was a 50 sq km water sprawl in the southern suburbs of Chennai. Now, it is 4.3 sq km—less than a tenth of its original.

·         Pallikaranai marsh acted as a natural flood sink when the rains overwhelmed Chennai. “The marsh that was till about 30 years ago spread over an area of more than 5000 ha (hectares) has been reduced to around one-tenth of its original extent due to anthropogenic (manmade) pressures. The free flow of water within the entire marsh has been totally disrupted due to mega construction activities and consequent road laying,” a 2007 study  by a group of German and Indian scientists noted.

·         The growing finger of a garbage dump sticks out like a cancerous tumour in the northern part of the marshland.

·         Two major roads cut through Pallikaranai waterbody with a few pitifully small culverts that are not up to the job of transferring the rain water flows from such a large catchment. The edges have been eaten into by institutes like the National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT). Ironically, NIOT is an accredited consultant to prepare environmental impact assessments on various subjects, including on the implications of constructing on water bodies.


·         There were 16 tanks downstream of Retteri called Vyasarpadi chain of tanks. Kodungaiyur tank was one among them. Now, there is no sign of them.

·         There was also a tank in Thirumangalam area which is missing now.

·         There were once 13 water bodies in Neelankarai (the name itself shows that this place was on the banks of a water body). Only 2 lakes remain now.

·         The Virugambakkam drain was 6.5 km long and drained into the Nungambakkam tank. It  is now present only for an of extent of 4.5 km. The remaining two km stretch of the drain is missing.

·         Nungambakkam tank (part of Long Tank) was completely filled and built. This along with the loss of Koyambedu drain has resulted in the periodic flooding of Koyambedu and Virugambakkam areas.

·         The surplus channels connecting various water bodies in western suburbs such as Ambattur and Korattur have been encroached upon.

·         The water body in Mogappair has almost disappeared. 

·         The Veerangal Odai that connects the Adambakkam lake with Pallikaranai marsh ends abruptly after 550 m from its origin and the remaining part is not to be seen. This causes inundation in places such as Puzhithivakkam and Madipakkam.

·         The Chennai Bypass connecting NH45 to NH4 blocks the east flowing drainage causing flooding in Anna Nagar, Porur, Vanagaram, Maduravoyal, Mugappair and Ambattur.

·         The Maduravoyal lake has shrunk from 120 acres to 25 acres. Same with Ambattur, Kodungaiyur and Adambakkam tanks.

·         The Koyambedu drain and the surplus channels from Korattur and Ambattur tanks are missing.

·         The South Buckingham Canal from Adyar creek to Kovalam creek has been squeezed from its original width of 25 metres to 10 metres in many places due to the Mass Rapid Transit System railway stations.

·         Important flood retention structures such as Virugambakkam, Padi and Villivakkam tanks are no longer there.

·         Elevated Express freight corridor from Chennai harbour to Maduravoyal had  reclaimed a substantial portion of the Coovum’s southern bank drastically reducing the flood-carrying capacity of the river.

·         The lost water body of Velacheri between the year 2000 and 2015 is shown below.



·         The two drainage canals that went missing when I.T park was developed in Siruseri.


·         Water bodies shrunk by the Sholinganallur I.T park is shown below.


·         A comparison of the Chennai topography with the missing Long Tank is shown below.  In the figure, No1 shows Coovum river. No 2 shows Adyar river. Where is No 3?


The lesson

We have robbed the natural habitation of Chennai’s water routes. They have paid us back.

***********

Sources for this compilation:-

















Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Calamitous rains in Chennai - சென்னையில் ஊழி.


Chennai and Tamilnadu are in the grip of unprecedented rainfall which has intensified since yesterday night. It is as though an Oozhi  (ஊழி) or Pralaya had set in. There is no one who has not been affected by these rains in some way or the other. With more rains predicted for the coming days, it appears that things are going beyond human efforts to bring some succor to the suffering people. I can only think of Govardhan Krishna to protect us from the wrath of Varuna Bhagawan as he once did to protect the yadhavas from the wrath of Indra. This year being "VaaruNa Megha", Varuna is dominating the skies bringing heavy rainfall. (Read here)





Let us all pray to Govardhan Krishna to bring an end to the currently escalating calamity. The 10 Pasurams of Nammazhwar starting as ‘Aazhiyezhach sangum villum ezha’ are fit to be recited now, praying Lord Krishna to offer protection to the crores of people of Tamilnadu from the incessant downpour.



Monday, August 10, 2015

Karunanidhi’s 'Ramanuja' – a distortion of sorts as usual. (Article by Sri AMR)


The following is the article written by Sri A.M.Rajagopalan (AMR) in Tamil in Kumdam Jothidam on the kind of distortions and denigrations that M.Karunanidhi is infusing in his dialogues for the TV serial on Acharya Ramanuja. I don’t watch that serial and I believe no believer and follower of Acharya Ramanuja would be interested in seeing that serial.


Sri AM Rajagopalan (AMR)

Anyone can speak well about God or the Acharya purushas, but for people to listen to him or her, that person must have fulfilled certain qualifications. For this, the clues and authority come from the verses of Azhwars who are the pillars of Tamil Vedas that always look at the Luminous One in the way “tad viShNO  paramam padam, sada pashyanthi sUrayaha”.  From the verses that I know of Azhwars and recite almost every day, I can see 2 lines of thought on who is eligible to even utter “Namo Narayanaya Namaha”. One is from Periyazhwar and the other from Thirumangai Azhwar.


Periyazhwar.


Karunanidhi – who mouthed the infamous dialogue on Lord Rama asking in which Engineering college Rama studied stands disqualified at the very outset to even utter the name of the Lord. In the very 2nd verse of Pallandu songs, Peryazhwar wants only those who have not abused Rama for 21 generations to sing in praise of Him (Vishnu).


Moreover Karunanidhi, as cautioned by Periyazhwar belongs to the group that speaks about the Lord for “food” or sustenance. Karunanidhi hit upon the idea to write on Acharya Ramanuja only when he realized that the ‘Pandaaram” party (BJP) cannot be dispensed with and that it has some support among people of Tamilnadu. A serial like this would help him to tell people that he is not anti- Hindu. At the time of starting to write this serial, it even looked as though he was clearing the decks of anti-Hindu tag, so that it won’t be difficult to align with the BJP if at all a chance arises in future.


According to Periyazhwar, the person who wishes to join the group that sings “Pallandu” to God (Long live God) must have made himself subservient to God and not have abused God for 21 generations. The ideal person to enter the group is one who enters even before he / she has learnt to basic alphabets (Yedu nilathil iduvathan munnam vanthu) (ஏடு நிலத்தில் இடுவதன் முன்னம் வந்து எங்கள் குழாம் புகுந்து).  Only such people can even utter “Namo Narayana”. 


There is another category of people. They would not have known about God. They would have led a very despicable life of causing harm to others. They could have been robbers. But even then, if they had repented for what they had been all along and wanted to change by worshiping God, then they are very much welcome to sing “Namo Narayana”. Thirumangai Azhwar discovered the pleasure and utility of uttering this name after having lived as a robber and reformed later. His famous verses starting as “Vaadineen, vaadi varinthinen”( வாடினேன் வாடி வருந்தினேன்)  show that repentance comes first in leading the person to understand the glory of God. Karunanidhi has no thought of repentance for what he had done in misleading generations of people.


Thirumangai Azhwar

When such a person writes the life history of Acharya, we can only recall Madhura Kavi Azhwar’s words on Nammazhwar“Payanandraagilum, paangallar aagilum, seyal nandraaga, thirutthip paNi koLvaan” (பயனன்றாகிலும் பாங்கல்லராகிலும் செயல் நன்றாக திருத்திப் பணி கொள்வான்). Acharya is one who would reform those who are useless and deficient. We can only think that Acharya Ramanuja would someday make Karunanidhi a reformed person.



But until now there is no sign of it – as we can make out from the mean-minded depictions in the serial.


********


ஆன்மீக ராமானுஜரை அரசியல் ராமானுஜராக சித்தரிக்க வேண்டாம்! – .எம்.ஆர்

பகவானைப் பற்றியோ அல்லது மகான்கள், சாதுக்கள், அவதார புருஷர்கள், மகாத்மாக்கள், சித்த புருஷர்கள் ஆகியோரைப் பற்றியோ அல்லது அவர்களது திவ்ய சரித்திரத்தைப் பற்றியோ எழுத வேண்டும் என்றால், அதற்கான குறைந்தபட்ச அடிப்படைத் தகுதிகள் வேண்டும்

அத்தகைய தகுதிகள் என்ன என்பதைப் பற்றி நம் ஆன்றோர்களும், சான்றோர்களும் அருளியுள்ளனர். தெய்வபக்தி, நமது கலாசாரம், பண்பு, நேர்மை, ஒழுக்கம் ஆகியவற்றில் நம்பிக்கை, நமது பாரதப் புண்ணிய பூமியின் சென்ற கால தெய்வீகச் சரித்திரம், நமது தர்ம நெறிமுறையை காப்பாற்றுவதற்காக ஏராளமான மகான்களும், மன்னர்களும், வீரர்களும் புரிந்துள்ள தியாகங்கள் ஆகியவற்றை நன்கு தெரிந்தவர்களாக இருக்க வேண்டும்.

ஸ்ரீமத் மகாபாரதத்தையும், ஸ்ரீமத் பாகவதத்தையும் மகரிஷி வியாசரால்தான் எழுத முடியும். இதிகாச ரத்தினம் எனப் பூஜிக்கப்படும் ஸ்ரீமத் ராமாயணத்தை வால்மீகி மகரிஷியினால் மட்டும்தான் எழுத முடியும். திருக்குறளை வள்ளுவப் பெருமானால் மட்டும்தான் வடித்திருக்க முடியும். பிரபல அரசியல் தலைவர் ஒருவர் எழுதும் ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரின் சரித்திரம், தனியார் தொலைக்காட்சி ஒன்றில் தொடர் ஒளிபரப்பாக ஒளிபரப்பப்போவதாக விளம்பரம் செய்து வந்த போதிலிருந்தே, அது எப்படி இருக்கும் என்பதை ஊகித்துப் பார்க்க முடிந்தது.

இந்து மதத்தின் மீதும், ஸ்ரீ ராமபிரான் மீதும் காலம் காலமாக துவேஷத்தையே விஷமாகப் பரப்பி வருபவரும், தீவிர நாத்திகக் கொள்கைகளைக் கடைப்பிடித்து வருபவருமான இந்த அரசியல் தலைவர், ஏன் அவதார புருஷரும், வைணவ சம்பிரதாயத்தின் உயிர்மூச்சாக விளங்குபவருமான ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரைப் பற்றி எழுத முன்வந்திருக்கிறார் எனப் பலரும் ஆச்சரியப்படுகின்றனர்.

நாத்திகம் என்ற விஷ விதையை புனிதமான தமிழ் மண்ணில் விதைத்து , காழ்ப்புணர்ச்சி என்னும் தண்ணீரைப் பாய்ச்சி அதனை விஷவிருட்சமாக வளர்த்து, அதன் மூலம் தன்னையும், தங்கள் குடும்பத்தையும் வளர்த்துக் கொண்டிருப்புவர்களுக்கு ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரைப் போன்ற அவதார புருஷர்களைப் பற்றி எழுதுவதற்கு என்ன தகுதியுள்ளதுமகாபுருஷரான ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரின் ஆயிரம் ஆண்டு நிறைவு விழாவை உலகம் கொண்டாட இருக்கும் இத்தருணத்தில், இந்த அரசியல் தலைவர் தனது கொள்கைகளுக்கு முற்றிலும் மாறான ஒரு மகானைப்பற்றி எழுதி, அதனை தொலைக்காட்சி மூலம் ஒளிபரப்ப முன்வந்திருப்பதின் நோக்கத்தைப் புரிந்து கொள்வது அப்படி ஒன்றும் கடினமானது அல்ல.

ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரின் வாழ்க்கைச் சரித்திரத்தை தனது கொள்கைகளுக்கு ஏற்றவாறு மாற்றி அமைத்து, அதனைத் தனது கட்டுப்பாட்டில் உள்ள தொலைக்காட்சி மூலம் பிரசாரப்படுத்துவதே இத்தொடர் ஒளிபரப்பின் நோக்கம் என்பது அனைவருக்கும் தெரியும்.

30-06-2015
அன்றைய இரவு தொலைக்காட்சியில்

நாத்திகக் கொள்கைகளிலேயே தன் வாழ்நாள் முழுவதையும் கழித்தவர்கள் எழுதினால் இத்தகைய புனிதமான புண்ணிய சரித்திரங்கள் எவ்விதம் மக்களிடையே திரித்துப் பிரசாரப்படுத்தப்படும் என்பதை தெரிந்து கொள்ள, 30-06-2015 செவ்வாய்க்கிழமை அன்று இரவு அந்த தனியார் தொலைக்காட்சியில் ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜர் தொடர் ஒளிபரப்பில் காண்பிக்கப்பட்ட ஒரு நிகழ்ச்சி ஒன்றே போதும்,
நெற்றியில்பளிச்சென்று திருநாமம் இட்டுக்கொண்டுள்ள, குடுமி வைத்த ஒரு ஸ்ரீவைணவ இளைஞர், அழகான ஒரு இளம்பெண்ணை பார்த்து பல்லைக் காட்டுவதும், அவளைப் பின்தொடர்ந்து செல்வது போன்றும் அக்காட்சி காட்டப்பட்டது. அந்த இளம்பெண் சற்று தூரத்திற்கு சென்று விட்டார்.

ஆனால், அப்பெண் தனக்கு பக்கத்தில் இருப்பதாக நினைத்த அந்த வைணவ இளைஞர் தன் அருகில் இருந்த மூதாட்டி ஒருவரைக் கட்டி அணைத்து, கொஞ்சுவதாகக் காட்சி அமைந்திருந்தது. அதனால் வெகுண்ட அந்த மூதாட்டி அந்த வைணவ இளைஞரை நையப் புடைக்கிறார். அந்த மூதாட்டியுடன் அங்கு அருகிலிருந்த வேறு சில பெண்மணிகளும் சேர்ந்து கொண்டு அந்த வைணவ இளைஞரை செம்மையாக அடிப்பதாக அக்காட்சி அமைந்திருந்தது.

இதுபோன்றே, தாகத்தினால் வருந்திய திருக்கச்சி நம்பிகளுக்கு தாகம் தணிய தண்ணீர் கொடுக்க ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரின் தாயார் மறுப்பதுபோல் ஒரு காட்சியும் காட்டப்பட்டுள்ளது.

ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜர் எனும் ஒரு மகத்தான அவதாரபுருஷரைத் தன் வயிற்றில் சுமந்து பெற்ற ஓர் தெய்வீக அன்னை, இந்த அளவிற்கு நெஞ்சில் ஈரமற்றவராக இருந்திருக்க முடியாது. இது பிற்காலத்தில் தங்கள் சுயநலத்திற்காக சிலரால் சேர்க்கப்பட்ட கட்டுக்கதையாகத்தானிருக்க முடியும். அவதார புருஷர்கள் அன்பு, பக்தி ஆகியவற்றினால் உயர்ந்த உத்தம ஸ்திரீகளின் கர்ப்பத்தில்தான் அவதரிப்பார்கள். ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜர் ஸ்ரீராமபிரானின் தம்பியான ஸ்ரீ லட்சுமண சுவாமியின் அவதாரமென கோடான கோடி மக்களால் பூஜிக்கப்படும் அவதார புருஷர். ஸ்ரீ ராமபிரானையே கேவலமாகத் தூற்றிய இந்த அரசியல் தலைவர் எழுதும் கதை வேறு எவ்விதம் இருக்க முடியும்?

13-07-2015
அன்று…!

இவை போன்றே, 13-07-2015 அன்றைய ஒளிபரப்பில், சிறுவன் ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜருக்கு உபநயனம் (பூணூல் போடுவது) வைபவத்தை வைத்து, மக்களிடையே துவேஷத்தைத் தூண்டிவிடும், விஷமத்தனமான, முற்றிலும் ஆதாரமற்ற ஒரு காட்சி காட்டப்பட்டது. மற்ற குழந்தைகளுடன் சமமாக விளையாடுவதற்கு பூணூல் தடையாக இருப்பதாக சிறுவன் ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரே கூறுவது போன்று காட்சி அமைக்கப்பட்டிருந்தது. இந்நிகழ்ச்சிக்கு எவ்வித ஆதாரமும் கிடையாது. இது முற்றிலும் கற்பனையானதே!

இதன் நோக்கம் என்ன என்பதை மக்கள் எளிதில் புரிந்து கொள்வார்கள். இந்து சமுதாயத்தை கேவலப்படுத்துவதும், விரசமான காட்சிகளை பரம பவித்ரமான ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரின் திவ்ய சரித்திரத்தில் காண்பிப்பதும், எத்தகைய கேவலமான செயல் என்பதை, இந்த வயோதிக காலத்திலும் கூட இந்த அரசியல் தலைவர் புரிந்து கொள்ளவில்லையேநல்ல திறமையும், தமிழ்மொழியில் பாண்டித்யமும் பெற்ற இவர், நம் நாட்டிருக்கும், குறிப்பாக தமிழகத்திற்கும், தமிழ் மக்களுக்கும் நன்மை செய்வதற்காகத் தனது திறமைகளை நன்கு பயன்படுத்திக் கொண்டிருக்கலாம். திறமைகள் இருப்பினும், மனம் நல்ல வழியில் செல்வதற்கு இறைவனின் கருணை வேண்டும் அல்லவா? அந்தக் கருணையைப் பெறுவதற்கும் புண்ணியம் செய்திருக்க வேண்டும்.

சினிமா கதையல்ல ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரின் புண்ணிய சரித்திரம். மகாத்மாவும், தன் வாழ்க்கை முழுவதையும் வைணவத்திற்காகவே அர்ப்பணித்தவரும், தியாகசீலருமான ஸ்ரீமத் ராமானுஜரின் திவ்ய சரித்திரத்தில் தனது சொந்தக் கருத்துக்களையும், அரசியல் கொள்கைகளையும் புகுத்துவது மன்னிக்கமுடியாத குற்றமாகும். நீதிமன்றங்களாவது, சமூகத்தின் நன்மை கருதி இது விஷயத்தில் தலையிடுமா?

எதிர்பார்ப்புடன்,

என்றும் உங்கள் .எம்.ஆர்.

நன்றி குமுதம் ஜோதிடம்


***************


Related posts:-