An early Pandyan king had reached the Himalayas and
engraved the fish emblem of his dynasty and also the tiger and bow emblems of
Chola and Chera dynasties alongside. The Tamil
portion of the Sinnamanur Copper plates states that he
engraved them on top of the Northern Mountain (Vada-varai in Tamil).
This stands out from what the Cheran king Imaya Varamban Nedum Cheraladhan and the Cholan king Karikaal Cholan had done. The Cheran and Cholan kings
had engraved the emblem of their own kingdoms, but the Pandyan king had engraved
the emblems of all three the Tamil countries. This information recorded 1000
years ago in Sinnamanur copper plates can also be cross-referenced in
Silappadhikaram written 1900 years ago.
In the famous chapter on “Aicchiyar
Kuravai”, the opening verses say,
“The Pandyan king whose orders were obeyed by the
‘tiger’ and the ‘bow’ that were engraved on the side of the ‘fish’ on the
forehead of the Himalayas and the kings of the cool groves of Nāvalam..” (1)
This verse implies that there was a time in the past
of a Pandyan king who brought Cheran and Cholan kingdoms under his authority. The
kingdoms of Nāvalam also were obeying his orders or were subservient to that
Pandyan king. Nāvalam is the Tamil word for Jambu dweepa. Bharat / India was
referred to as Nāvalam Theevu until
Silappadhikaram times.
The name of this king finds mention only in one text
that is available to us. His name is Kon NedumARan,
the Pandyan king who engraved all the three emblems on the Himalayas.
The text is “Pandi-k-kovai”
– a compilation done sometime about 1000 years ago. Kovai is a type of
composition which is basically an arrangement of verses in an orderly manner (கோவை
< கோர்வை < கோர்த்தல்).
There is an erroneous opinion that Kovai is a later innovation. But a Kovai by
name “Achara-k-kovai”
was published during a Sangam Assembly.
The uniqueness of Pandikkovai is that the verses were
originally found as quotes in the commentary by Nakkeerar
to Iṟaiyanār Kaĺaviyal that was published for the first time in the last Sangam
Assembly presided by Pandyan king Ugra Peru Vazhuthi.
This was 2000 years ago. The verses of Pandikkovai must therefore be older than
2000 years.
The extensive usage of these verses in the
commentary shows that the text that contained those verses was popular at that
time. The commentator, Nakkeerar did not think it necessary to mention the name
of the text when he quoted as many as 326 verses from that text. This again
goes to prove that the Assemblage that was sitting there to judge the quality
and accuracy of the commentary was familiar with the verses.
The original text must be having more than 326 verses.
The name of the original composition and its author are not known. Long after
Nakkeerar’s time, these 326 verses were arranged by an unknown person in a
coherent way and were given the name, Kovai of the Pandya – ‘Pandikkovai’. Some
of the information contained in Pandikkovai can be cross checked from other
sources that help us to decipher parts of history of the past.
Kon Nedumaran, the king who engraved the
fish symbol on the Himalayas.
There are 6 verses in Pandikkovai that mention that Kon Nedumaran engraved
the fish emblem on the Himalayas. Of them one verse says that he engraved the
emblems of the other two kings.
It is not possible to make out from the verses when
and how he made this expedition. But there is a verse that gives a connection
to the river Ganges by mentioning him as “Gangai Mańāĺan”
meaning the ‘husband of Ganga’. This name comes in the context of a victory at
a place called “Mańaṟṟi Mangai” (மணற்றி
மங்கை).
It is not known which place is indicated by this except that Mangai refers to
‘woman’. This gives rise to an opinion that the king overpowered some
resistance in a place near the river Ganges having ‘woman’ as part of its name while
on his way to the Himalayas. His victory at that place near Ganges might have
given him the title the “husband of Ganga’ (2)
The six verses mentioning the fish emblem on the
Himalayas give some other information too, which will be discussed below.
(1)
Verse 154 says,
“சத்ரு
துரந்தரன்
பொன் வரை மேல்
மீன் உடையான்”
மீன் உடையான்”
Meaning:-
Shatru Dhurandharan who had fish on the golden mountain.
(2)
Verse 32 says
“கருங்கயல் சூட்டிய சென்னிச் செம்பொன் வரை போல்”
Meaning:-
The golden mountain adorned with black fish at its head (peak).
(3)
Verse 51 says,
“ஆய கெண்டைபனி தாழ் வட வரை மேல்
வைத்த
பஞ்சவன் பாழி வென்ற
குனி
தாழ்
சிலை
மன்னன்”
Meaning:-
Panjavan who placed the “KeNdai” fish on top of the snowy northern mountain, he
who won Pāzhi.
(4)
Verse 200 says,
“கெண்டை வட வரை மேல் வைத்த
வானவன் மாறன்”
Meaning:- Vānavan Māran who affixed ‘KeNdai’ on top of
the northern mountain.
(5)
Verse 109 says,
பொறி கெழு கெண்டை பொன் மால் வரை வைத்து
இப்
பூமி
எல்லாம்
நெறி கெழு செங்கோல் நடாம் நெடுமாறன் நெல்வேலி வென்றான்
நெறி கெழு செங்கோல் நடாம் நெடுமாறன் நெல்வேலி வென்றான்
Meaning:- Nedumaran who fixed the spotted “Kendai” fish
on the tall, golden mountain and ruled righteously with his sceptre won
Nelveli.
(6)
Verse 100 says,
சிலை மிசை வைத்த புலியும் கயலும் சென்று ஓங்கு செம்பொன்
மலை மிசை வைத்த பெருமான் வரோதயன்
மலை மிசை வைத்த பெருமான் வரோதயன்
Meaning:-
Varódhayan (a title of Kon Nedumaran)
who carved the tiger and the fish above the bow on the tall, golden mountain.
Discussion on the information from these
6 verses:-
(1) The king
Kon Nedumaran had ceremonial titles in Sanskrit. In the first quote he is
mentioned as “Shatru Dhuradharan”. Dhuradhara in
Sanskrit means ‘unstoppable’, ‘invincible’ etc. He was unstoppable by his
enemies and therefore the title Shatru Dhuradhara. Assuming that titles are
given by learned men, this shows that Sanskrit scholars were present in his
country and Sanskrit was in usage and understood by people.
The 6th quote mentions him as “Varódhayan” which is also a Sanskrit word. He was
considered as a boon.
There are other titles found in Pandikkovai, some of
which are Sanskritised like “Parāngushan”, “Ushithan”, Vijaya Charithan”
etc.
This shows
that Sanskrit had a presence in Deep South from an undated antiquity.
(2) The fish in the symbol is specifically mentioned
as “Kendai”. This is Mullet
fish found in tropical waters. It looks long.
This is in contrast to the twin fish emblem seen in
later Pandyan period. The coins released by the Sundara Pandyan of the 13th
century CE bear the images of twin fish (Mullets) along with bow and tiger,
showing his victory over Cholan and Cheran lands.
Sundara Pandyan’s son Veera Pandyan engraved the
twin fish symbol on Konamalai (Trincomalee) in Srilanka.
There is no way to assume that early Pandyans used
twin fish.
(3) The 3rd quote erases any doubt about
the mountain on which the king engraved the symbol. The 3rd quote
specifically mentions that the mountain was snowy and its location was in the
north. This is an obvious reference to the Himalayan Mountain. The 2nd
and 6th quotes refer to the golden colour of the mountain. The exact word
is செம்பொன் –
Chem-pon, meaning red-gold. This could refer to the glistening colour under the
sun rays.
Himalayan peaks of Panchachuli range at sunset.
Credit:-HERE
(4) The 3rd quote mentions another name
of the king as “Panjavan” who won Pāzhi (பாழி).
This information on the victory at Pāzhi that gave
the king the name Panjavan is found in the inscription of Sinnmanur copper
plates.
The inscription links the title “Panjavan” with the
victory at Pāzhi without mentioning the name of the king who scored that victory.
(By the pronunciation of it in Tamil, it is Panjavan not Panchavan). Olden Pandyans
carried two titles Panjavan and Gowriyan. These titles appear in Sangam verses. Of
these two, Gowriyan is easily decipherable as that refers to Gowri (Parvathi or
Meenakshi) from whom the Pandyans traced their lineage.
The title Panjavan is perplexing as that seems to
refer to number five. Present day commentators and writers have tried to
understand the meaning of Panjavan on this basis. The most commonly heard explanation
for this name is that it refers to the 5 types of land forms that were supposed
to be present in the Pandyan land. There is a line in a Sangam text called “Madurai-k-kānji” that says that the Pandyan kingdom
had 5 types of lands. (3)
But the above quoted part of the Pandyan
inscriptions says that the name Panjavan was due to the victory at Pāzhi. This
gives a clue to look for probable words connected with battles and battle
fields. There is a word in Tamil ‘Panjaritthal”
(பஞ்சரித்தல்) which means “giving
trouble”. The Pandyan king came to be called as Panjavan because he caused
trouble to his enemies at Pāzhi from whom he snatched Pāzhi in the battle. So
the name Panjavan is derived from ‘Panjaritthal’. Panjavan is one who did
Panjaritthal.
The victory at Pāzhi must have been a great one that
changed the Pandyan or even Tamils’ history. Otherwise this name would not have
found mention in the inscription and remained forever in the lineage as a
titular name.
The victory at Pāzhi by Kon Nedumaran is mentioned
in few other verses of Pandikkovai. In two verses there is a specific mention
of Then Pāzhi, meaning Southern Pāzhi.
“தென்பாழிப் பகை
செற்ற
பஞ்சவன்” (4)
“தென் பாழி வென்ற
கயல் மன்னு வெல் கொடிக் காவலன் மாறன்” (5)
கயல் மன்னு வெல் கொடிக் காவலன் மாறன்” (5)
This reference to south is significant as Pāzhi
formed the southern boundary of the Tamil lands of Pandyan of the 1st
Sangam period.
As per the commentary by Adiyaarkku
Nallar to Silappadhikaram, South Pāzhi was a port. One of the meanings
of Pāzhi in Tamil is ‘port’ or ‘dock yard’. The South Pazhi was at a distance
of 700 Kāvadham / Kādam from a river called Pahruĺi.
There were 49 scattered lands present in this span across the Indian Ocean
during the 1st Sangam age. They were all lost to the seas along with
South Pāzhi in the 2nd submergence. Only river Pahruli was left
along with the river Kumari after that submergence. And they also were lost to
the seas in the 3rd submergence that made the Pandyan kingdom to be
shifted to the present-day Madurai. Therefore the victory of Kon Nedumaran at
South Pāzhi puts him at 1st Sangam age - at greater antiquity.
(Details of these would be separately discussed in another post).
The Sinnamanur inscriptions do not mention the names
of kings of antiquity. By not mentioning the name of the one who won at Pāzhi
and who engraved the emblems at the Himalayas, it is made out that they
belonged to antiquity. This also serves as a proof that Kon Nedumaran did
belong to a remote past in history in a region where habitats existed scattered
across the Indian Ocean.
Acquisition of South Pāzhi must have meant complete
eradication of any threat from the surrounding areas to Pandyan lands. South Pāzhi
as a major port city must have boosted up the economic and political power of
the Pandyans and facilitated the movement of people and goods in olden days.
Therefore winning Pāzhi by wresting it from those who occupied it earlier meant
a feather in the cap for the Pandyans. For this acquisition, Kon Nedumaran came to be celebrated as
Panjavan which his descendants proudly remembered by adopting it as their
titular name.
The word Pāzhi having the special letter of Tamil
zhi ழி is
interchangeable with ‘li’. In his commentary to Silappadhikaram, writer
Adiyaarkku nallar (10th / 12th century CE) mentioned
Pāzhi as Pāli!
Pāli was oldest language of the common people of
India. Is it just coincidental that this name was found in Pandyan lands? Does Pāli
language have any connection with Pāzhi?
Discussion to be continued in the next part..
References:
(1) Silappadhikaram – Ch 17- lines 1-5
கயலெழுதிய
இமய
நெற்றியின்
அயலெழுதிய
புலியும்
வில்லும்
நாவலந்தண்
பொழின்
மன்னர்
ஏவல் கேட்பப்
பாரர
சாண்ட
மாலை வெண்குடைப்
பாண்டியன்
(2)
Pandikkovai – Verse 180
கொங்கை தளரினும்
கூந்தல்
நரைப்பினும்
ஏந்தல்
மற்று
இவ்
அங்கை அடைக்கலம் என்றே கருதி அருள்க கண்டாய்
கங்கை மணாளன் கலிமதனன் கடிமா மணற்றி
மங்கை அமர் அட்ட கோன் வையை நாடு அன்ன மாதரையே.
அங்கை அடைக்கலம் என்றே கருதி அருள்க கண்டாய்
கங்கை மணாளன் கலிமதனன் கடிமா மணற்றி
மங்கை அமர் அட்ட கோன் வையை நாடு அன்ன மாதரையே.
(3) Madurai-k-kanji – line 325
ஐம்பால் திணையும்
கவ்வி
(4) Pandikkovai – verse 165
(5) Pandikkovai – verse 151
(To be continued)
