Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Malaysian plane disaster – any clues from astrology?



After seeing the prolonged search for the missing Malaysian air craft, I think we have to look for clues of its destiny from astrology. Already I have uploaded my research article on aviation disasters here from which the basics found in such disasters can be read. Let’s take a brief look at them before analysing this missing aircraft. 


In the case of aviation disasters the following features are noticed:

·         The accident time lagna must be in malefic drekkans. The drekkana of the time of last contact / supposed disaster is taken into account. {A chart of these drekkanas for quick reference is given in my article for which the link is given above}.

·         The upagrahas namely Gulika, Dhooma, Kaala, Vyatipada and Upaketu must be afflicting the planets of importance for aviation disasters.

·          Mercury stands for transportation. The affliction to mercury must be there.

·         The 3rd house in the Natural zodiac stands for short trips. This is Gemini. Gemini also signifies airy sign. Affliction to Gemini must be there.

·         The 3rd house from Mercury must be afflicted.

·         The 3rd house from lagna must be afflicted.

·         The afflicting planet in most cases is Mars signifying explosion and fire. It must be implicating Mercury or 3rd lord or 3rd house etc.

·          Saturn as airy planet also has a role in air mishaps.

·         If moon is afflicted by malefics and is devoid of positive Jovian influence at the time of mishap, fatalities are certain.

·         Saturnine connection to Mercury or moon is also seen in most air mishaps denoting a hazard in the air.
Now to analyse these features, let us take a look at the chart constructed for the time of last contact / detection by radar. It is at that time something has gone wrong.


·    
 The ascendant is Scorpio with lagna in 2nd drekkana. It is malefic. 

·         Among the upagrahas of importance Upaketu and Kala are in shravana nakshatra conjoined with Mercury and Venus. Gulika is close to the ascendant in Jyeshta (Mercury star) within 2 degrees. Dhooma is at Pushya’s end (Saturn star) from where it is apsecting Mecrury and Venus. Vyatipada is in Sagittarius aspecting the 2nd (maraka) lord Jupiter posted in Gemini (3rd house in Natural zodiac). It is a sign of enmity for Jupiter and it happens to be the the 8th house. 

·         Mercury is in the 3rd house from the lagna. It is aspected by Mars (4th aspect)

·         The 3rd in the Natural zodiac is occupied by 2nd lord Jupiter which receives the aspect of Ketu and Vyatipada.

·         The 3rd house from Mercury is Pisces which is Papa karthari. Its lord Jupiter is in 8th in opposition to Vyatipada.

·         The 3rd house from lagna is aspected by Mars and this house is not redeemed by Jupiter’s aspect.

·         Moon is in Rohini – a vulnerable star for disasters- and is receiving 8th aspect of Mars. Saturn and Rahu are towing after this Mars.


Thus the indicators of a disaster are complete at this time.

This can be further cross-checked with prasna derivatives.

Per this, the lagna signifies the pilot and the 7th house signifies passengers.

The fourth house signifies the plane and the 7th from it, i.e., the 10th house signifies its destination or destiny. These can be expressed as follows:




The lagna lord Mars has gone into the 12th house of loss showing that the pilot has lost control.
The 4th lord Saturn joins it in retrogression showing that the plane had gone with him and lost. Rahu joining them shows that the plane is lost forever. 

The 7th lord (passengers) had joined Mercury (factor for transport) in the 3rd house (aviation disasters) and is aspected by Mars that is conjoined with Saturn and Rahu. Mars signifies explosion, violence and bloodshed. The fate of the passengers need not be explained further.

The 4th lord Saturn (plane) in the 12th house and the 10th lord Sun in the 4th house make this chart a perfect picture for aviation disaster. The destiny of the flight is where the plane was at the time of last contact. It is Aquarius, a sign that is frequently connected with aviation disasters. 


Now to see what had happened to the flight:

The Lagna lord (pilot) and the 4th lord (plane) in the 12th house which happens to be the airy sign shows that some component of air (gas) and explosion (Mars) had happened to the plane in the air (Saturn)
The direction of this sign is west. The plane was cruising towards North east at the time of last sighting. It had turned left / west. Further on Mars is moving towards Virgo due to retrogression. That sign indicates south.

This shows that the most probable location of its final place is on south west direction. This is the opposite of the direction of cruise. It is also possible that the plane had cruised towards west for some time and turned south before disintegrating. 

Based on this the plausible cause for the disaster seems to be decompression of the plane. If that is so, it is a very serious issue in flight safety. 

Read these articles:-


Update on 13th March, 2024.



Ten years after the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, a new theory emerges. Simon Hardy, a British Boeing 777 pilot, suggests the flight's pre-departure documents hint at a deliberate act. He believes last-minute changes to the cargo manifest, including additional fuel and oxygen, could indicate Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah planned to crash the plane, the Independent reported. 

Mr Hardy, who worked with the Australian Transport Safety Bureau during the search in 2015, told The Sun, "It's a strange coincidence that the last engineering task that was done before it headed off to oblivion was topping up crew oxygen which is only for the cockpit, not for the cabin crew."

The aviation expert raised concerns about the "unusual" additions to the flight plan, questioning whether they adhered to proper protocol.

Mr Hardy said that the flaperon found on Reunion Island indicates there was an active pilot until the end of the flight, "If the flaps were down, there is a liquid fuel, then someone is moving a lever and it's someone who knows what they are doing. It all points to the same scenario."

Mr Hardy suggests meticulous planning by the pilot. He theorizes the pilot aimed to avoid leaving a fuel slick on the ocean's surface, making the final resting place difficult to locate.

Similar to other theories, Mr Hardy proposes the pilot deliberately depressurized the cabin to render passengers unconscious before executing a U-turn and crashing the plane.  Leveraging "satellite clues," Hardy believes he has pinpointed the missing aircraft's location - outside the official search area - within the Geelvinck Fracture Zone, a vast underwater trench in the Southern Indian Ocean.

Following a renewed interest in the MH370 mystery, the Malaysian government announced on March 3rd that they're considering resuming the search. A Texas-based company, Ocean Infinity, has proposed a "no find, no fee" deal to locate the aircraft that vanished in 2014.





Saturday, March 8, 2014

Vijaykanth's NDA entry suits Jaya's Big Win in Election 2014 - says TSV Hari



In 2009 Lok sabha elections, Vijayakanth split the anti-DMK votes that helped DMK /UPA to net 25 seats. In 2014 elections, he is going to split anti-Jayalalithaa votes to help her make a clean sweep, says Mr TSV Hari who is familiar to Thuglak readers in his pseudonym as Venkat.

This line of thinking seems to be what Jayalaithaa also tows. She was averse to Vijayakanth aligning with Cong-DMK for, that would become a formidable anti-Jayalalithaa combination backed up with heavy money bags from the Congress and the DMK. She did not hesitate to use the Rajiv killers -issue to create a fresh bout of bitterness against the Congress at a time when Vijaykanth almost finalised a deal with the Congress. That helped in successfully stalling the conglomeration of a strong anti-Jayalalithaa front. 

Jayalalithaa's further moves were directed at making it impossible for Vijaykanth to join the Congress –(which would rope in the DMK later). The initial two days of her campaign – i.e.,  until it was declared  that Vijayakanth had entered into a pact with BJP – Jayalalithaa was fiercely attacking Congress in her election speech. A good part of her speech was directed at listing out the misdeeds of the Congress. It looked odd and wasteful given that Congress is already a dead horse in Tamilnadu. But watching her recent speech in Nagappattinam and Mayiladuthurai – after Vijaykanth had entered in to the BJP alliance, there is a glaring difference. The rhetoric against the congress is less - as if it is no longer needed to keep reminding people how bad the Congress is and how bad it is to vote for anyone who aligns with it. It seems she thinks that the threat factor is gone with the DMDK- DMK- Congress alliance not taking off.

Now with Vijaykanth aligning with the BJP, the 'grand' DMDK – BJP- PMK- MDMK alliance is going to split anti -Jayalalithaa votes so that pro-Jayalalithaa votes would be more than what each of two opposing formations are going to bag. By aligning with these parties, the TN BJP is doing a big disservice to the country and itself. The harm to the country is that it is giving re-birth to the parties that are already consigned to the dustbin – the right place where they have to be for the benefit of the State at large. The harm it is doing to itself will be felt by it in the coming days. Within 3 months of aligning with Vijaykanth, Jayalalithaa regretted for having aligned with him. The TN BJP need not wait for that long – already they must have had a taste of it in the past one month of 'talks'. His foul mouth is going to spoil whatever chances that may be needed in the post poll scenario for the BJP.

Beyond all this I have a question. Usually people accuse Jayalalithaa as being arrogant, stubborn and not treating her allies well. What would one say for the diatribes that Vijayakanth is making in the past one month and in his on- and-off alliance talks with the Congress and the BJP and at Singapore with the DMK? It is an open secret –something written in leading Tamil news papers – that one of the issues to settle for the alliance talks was  money that he wants from the BJP (or any party that wants to ally with him – be it Congress or DMK) to fund the election expenses of his party. Why the EC is not taking a serious view of this? Why no one in the media questioned this? Why no one had taken him to court for this? Is this what the media people want us to believe as "Dance of democracy"?

- Jayasree


Hilarious political cartoon images




Hilarious political cartoon images




*******************


From


Vijaykant's NDA Entry Double-Edged Sword Cut To Suit Jaya's Big Win In TN Parl Seats?
By


Will Vijaykant's impending entry into the National Democratic Alliance pave the way for the bigger Vijay of Jaya from Tamil Nadu and/or Paraajay [defeat] of Modi's quest for the prime ministerial post?

Serious discussions are underway between the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam [DMDK] a political party headed, owned and operated by a washed up Telugu speaking thespian of the Tamil screen – Vijaykant alias Vijay Raj, a.k.a. Captain a.k.a. Amritraj born to Alagarswamy Naidu and Andaal in 1952 and the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party [BJP], the national outfit's Tamil Nadu boss Pon Radhakrishnan a.k.a. Ponra told reporters.

Ponra shot himself on his tongue when he began by saying in Tamil that the negotiations are on between his party and the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam.

After the press do, someone was heard snidely remarking: Does Ponra want a post-poll alliance with the DMK and is he hoping that his endeavour of talks with the DMDK will reduce the number of seats that the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam wins? Is that why the word Munnetra slipped out?

The talks are being conducted on the DMDK side by Sudhish, the brother-in-law of the actor-turned-politician.

Sources told Southern Features that main bones of contention from the side of Vijaykant are: [a] Vijaykant is announced as the leader of the alliance in Tamil Nadu; [b] a Rajya Sabha seat for Sudhish; [c] the maximum number of seats to go to the DMDK; [d] the financing of the contest of all the 40 constituencies – the solitary one being Puducherry – to be done by the BJP; [e] the choice of seats to be left to Vijaykant; [f] equal billing for the actor alongside Modi and [g] the BJP will operate all its national media assets to get to sing Vijaykant's praises to help him attain a countrywide stature.

Sources within the BJP and the DMDK indicate that the alliance is national in character.

"The first names in both the parties are a clear indication. "Bharatiya" means 'all-India' means 'national'. The word 'Desiya' exactly translates into English as 'national'. This front is the only one which has a serious prime ministerial hopeful and national character as two of its mainstays have the name national in them," the top BJP source began saying.

The source made fun of the possibility of Jayalalithaa being catapulted to lead the 3rd front.

"Those who say Jayalalithaa will be Modi's challenger, are living in a fool's paradise," the source said laughing at this scribe.

Are you meaning to aim this comment at me?

My question was on the basis of what I had written earlier. It was met with derision.

"Anyone who says such asinine things are to be only called as residents of cuckoo-land. And their imaginary leader today is one Mamata Bannerjee who is facing a revolt from her own party over the choice of India's football star Baichung Bhutia in the Gorkha-dominated Darjeeling, bypassing her own party cadres' claims. Because it is Mamata who said she would support Jaya for the post of prime minister," the source further said.

"The simple fact of life is that the BJP is becoming stronger while all the other parties are weakening in Tamil Nadu. The realistic main opposition Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam has virtually split between the two sons of Karunanidhi – one being MK Azhagiri – currently suspended from the outfit and the other is MK Stalin. The DMK has some 24% of the popular vote. Madurai downwards Azhagiri would ensure the defeat of all official DMK-led front candidates. In northern TN, Azhagiri's supporters will actively work to split the anti-AIADMK votes. One can even expect sources close to Jayalalithaa to finance such a move on the part of Azhagiri and even go easy on the case concerning granite export that involves his son and the more visible partner PRP – that runs into a huge sum well beyond a million crores of rupees," another source - this one from the a leader of the MDMK - part of this front, averred.

Congress was given a short, derisive shrift.

"The Congress is a goner in TN. But, knowing its leaders' love for money, some of them would contest and hope to split whatever number of votes they can and seriously hope that it would net some money from those candidates of the winnable AIADMK and/or the BJP-led front. The maximum money if any will come from the AIADMK chaps who have the money and ruling power," the source pointed out.

Other constituents of the possible BJP and/or DMDK led front did not matter at all according to a different source.

"Vaiko's Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam [MDMK] and Pattali Makkal Katchi [PMK] of the politically discredited Ramadoss have failed to make any impact during the last assembly elections. They are actually going to soak whatever money is available from the BJP – knowing very well that chances of their winning a single seat is lesser than nil. Let it also not be forgotten that not too long ago, Dr Anbumani Ramadoss had shared a dais with Uttar Pradesh CM Akhilesh Yadav in TN. Nothing came of it because Akhilesh was unwilling to spend money and the PMK was unwilling to spend its money.  And then, there are other some nameless parties of educationists like the Indhiya Jananayaga Katchi [IJK] who may be expected to bankroll the outfits in a big way, but why would someone like Dr Parri Venthar, who does not even pay salaries to his employees fund someone else's victory? And if the Venthar hopes to be given a Rajya Sabha seat simply because he rubbed shoulders with Narendra Modi in February during a convocation ceremony, he is sadly mistaken," the source close to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, miffed at the turn of events within the BJP argued citing the chances of the Chancellor of the SRM University.

"All this would only help the AIADMK which could spring quite a few surprises to Narendra Modi – regardless of the NDA winning big or small. Unless the BJP wins a majority on its own – which is highly unlikely – all the convulsions in Tamil Nadu will only suit the machinations of J Jayalalithaa. And that is why she even jettisoned the left. If the two parties levitate towards Karunanidhi, well they would be living in a bigger foolish paradise than the one cited earlier. The future of the DMK is finished. The left does not spend big money on elections. The DMK would hope to soak in the left votes in as many parliamentary constituencies as possible to show that Stalin is still relevant. That would only ensure bigger wins for the AIADMK nominees. Instead of accepting what had been offered, by opting out of the Jaya-led front, the 2 left parties' leaders in TN who also confirmed leaving the front have placed pistols into the palms of their feet, shoved both into their mouths and pulled the trigger," the source observed, tongue in cheek.

"In the final analysis, if the Modi magic does not work nationwide as expected, Jaya would be the compromise candidate proposed and supported by those who hate within and beyond the confines of the BJP. If that happens, the BJP would try to give the southern madam the same kind of ulcers she had given Vajpayee in the 90's. Else, it would be vice versa for Modi as Jaya will want quite a few concessions to support his candidature for the post of PM as she would command at least 35 MPs from TN, some 30 from AP bringing the tally to 65. Further, Jaya has a decent friendship with Navin Patnaik of Orissa and Mamata has acknowledged her support to the southern lady. Perhaps, in a strange secenario, Jaya may even herd Mamata into the NDA camp if it is ever worth it," the source added.

Here is the Vijaykant dossier from my earlier blog.

Vijaykant heads what is known as Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam [DMDK] that translates into National Progressive Dravidian Party.

Born in 1952 in Tirumangalam village – located in the outskirts of Madurai city, Vijaykant has seen a sedate climb to stardom.

He is the only son of his mother Andaal but has 7 step siblings.

The man who gave him a break first gave him the screen name Amritraj was director MA Kaja – in the 1979 film Inikkum Ilamai [sweet youth]. The name soon changed to Vijaykant. Some say the second half of the name was appended to the first following the resurgence of the movie career of another dark-skinned actor called Rajnikant who was born as the Marathi-Kannada speaking Shivaji Rao Gaekwad in Karnataka.

Neither Rajnikant nor Vijaykant can properly pronounce the Tamil letter  [zha] even despite having been leading lights in Kollywood after a career spanning 35 years plus.

Vijaykant was dropped from his debut 1978 film –En Kelvikku Enna Badil [what is the answer to my question] as those who made it felt the actor's Tamil diction was god-awful. A few years before the birth of Vijaykant, another actor was jettisoned from his first film by the director on the same grounds. His name was Marudur Gopalamenon Ramachandran [MGR], who had gone on to become the CM of Tamil Nadu.

Vijaykant calls himself black-MGR an anecdote snidely used today by Kollywood insiders who quickly point out that MGR wasn't a great deliverer of lines either.

Between 2001 and 2010, most of the movies starring Vijaykant had bombed at the box office.

He had begun the DMDK in 2005. Rumours about the DMDK 'donation fee' for a party ticket indicate the price range between Rs.5,000 and Rs.10,000.

Tamil Nadu's population in 2005 was roughly 5crores. The rough average for one each local representative per 100 persons. 

Thus, contests happened for some 500,000 plus 'elected' positions. If one goes by the most conservative estimate of Rs.5,000 per ticket – the math produces the unlikely result of Rs.250 crores in one go in the DMDK kitty in one go! Certainly Vijaykant never was paid that much.

No actor could have ever imagined earning that kind of money in an entire career even if he/she had delivered only super hits.

The money and a carefully selected assembly constituency Vriddhachalm helped Vijaykant become the sole legislator from the DMDK in 2006. Vijaykant has since changed his constituency to Rishivandhiyam.

The Karunanidhi-led Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam [DMK] or Dravidian Progressive Party in a clear minority in the state assembly with a little over 100 members managed to capture power in 2006 with the help of the 35 Congress legislators [none got a ministerial berth despite repeated demands] did something unthinkable.

Under the alibi of widening a highway in the northwest outskirts of Chennai, the regime partly demolished a marriage hall owned by Vijaykant's family. The actor termed it 'a vengeance on his personal property due to political rivalry resulting in untold misery and huge monetary losses.'

In the 2009, Vijaykant's DMDK contested in all the 40 parliamentary constituencies [the single being in the Union Territory of Puducherry] and polled the difference between victory and defeat in 25 of them. In other words, out of the United Progressive Alliance 29 seats [if one discounts the Sivaganga seat which Jaya claims had been lost by P Chidambaram the total works out to 28] won during the parliamentary elections of 2009, 25 were achieved through the machinations of Vijaykant Naidu.

The DMDK had abused all the parties – DMK, Congress, AIADMK and even the left. Besides, all the television channels in TN – under the instructions of the ruling DMK and the Congress had featured Vijaykant as an equal to Jaya, Karunanidhi and the Congress.

Therefore, it was of little wonder that the 2009 parliamentary results show that DMDK had garnered some 13% of the votes cast without winning a single seat.

The DMK leadership which immensely benefited from this soon forgot Vijaykant. When rumours began circulating about Vijaykant getting monetarily gratified, DMK top brass stopped taking calls from Vijaykant and from journalists on that subject.

This resulted in his hooking his bandwagon on to the AIADMK during the assembly elections in 2011 that resulted in his becoming the Leader of Opposition, a position he still enjoys, despite the majority of the opposition legislators being opposed to him.

Hence, Tamil Nadu has the dubious distinction of having had a minority regime that lasted the full term and later electing a minority leader of opposition.

Before finalizing his seat-sharing [there are many who call it shearing] arrangement with the BJP, Vijaykant had been saying that he would fight the parliamentary polls in the company of a party that would accept his leadership in Tamil Nadu.

In the unlikely prospect of this netting Vijaykant anything serious, many in his party believe that the move would improve his national stature and eventually make him the CM of Tamil Nadu, a fact the faded actor keeps repeating. And Modi would have the mortification of seeing Vijaykant getting a bigger billing than the BJP poster boy.

The math that points to the AIADMK romping home:

AIADMK with 32% of the popular vote-share is now contesting all the seats after the left has announced a break-up. Other smaller parties may hitch their bandwagon to give 1% more – i.e. 33%.

Vijaykant + BJP + Vaiko + PMK and other flotsam and jetsam outfits total some 20% of the popular votes – if one believes that the BJP gets 3% due to the Modi factor.

The DMK has a vote-share of roughly 24% - which may be split somewhat unevenly between the supporters of MK Stalin and Azhagiri.

The Congress claims an 8% share. The others could account for another 3%.

The contests will be 3-cornered. In the best case scenario, TN may see 80% polling in the parliamentary polls.

Of this, the AIADMK would expect to get its 33% in one block.

The rest would be split as 24% [DMK front], 20% [DMDK-BJP front], and some 11% to the other front comprising the Congress. This count would account for 55% - of the anti-incumbency vote against the AIADMK. Simply put, the arrangement benefits Jaya completely.

In my earlier blogs, I had claimed to have written the obituary of Vijaykant's political career.

I had pointed out the following:

Vijaykant had ensured that the United Progressive Alliance won 25 seats in 2009 parliamentary elections by going it alone and splitting roughly 13% of the votes in favour of the Congress-DMK-VCK alliance.

In 2011, by uniting the anti-DMK-Congress votes, he ensured that Jaya romped home to be CM and he became the Leader of Opposition.

The unconfirmed report is that Vijaykant brushes his teeth with an intoxicant early in the morning and stays sozzled throughout the day.

In Tamil Nadu, in the name of opposing the 'oppressive rulers and ushering in change' the heroic Captain Vijaykant would help his so-called political foe Jaya win big in the parliamentary elections – thus paving the way for her to bargain with the BJP after the elections.

It will not matter to Vijaykant that he may bag next to nothing during the parliamentary polls now because his advisors may be smugly thinking that he would be the next CM.

Sadly, that is one thing that may not happen at all as politically inebriated Vijaykant's antics will only boost the visibility of the BJP that stands to gain big in Tamil Nadu with the fading of the divided DMK and the fading Congress.


One of the bitter truths is that MGR had never married Vaikom Narayani Janaki following advice from some astrologers that women married to him would never remain alive for long.

Despite Jaya exposing this sordid fact and even accusing Janaki of poisoning MGR to death, it was Janaki who gifted her part of the AIADMK to Jayalalithaa before passing away.

The 'revolutionary leader' MGR had shaped the political career of Jayalalithaa by flaunting her on his shoulder.

The Indian Express had carried a very famous photograph of MGR and Janaki flanking MGR at the 1983 Asian Games held in New Delhi.

Jaya's 'closeness' to MGR had led to Jaya becoming CM – after her face-off with the late Janaki Ramachandran – who had been the longest live-in companion of MGR.

Vijaykant often enjoys his party workers referring to him as the black MGR.

The closeness to the fair-skinned MGR made Jaya CM.

Will the black MGR aid Jaya indirectly in becoming the PM by ensuring that the former actress's candidates manage to win very big in the ensuing parliamentary polls by splitting the anti-AIADMK votes just as he had helped the UPA to win 25 seats from  TN and Puducherry?  



Friday, February 21, 2014

Release of Rajiv killers - Is Jayalaithaa wrong?


Jayalalithaa has stirred up the Nation’s conscience by her move to release the Rajiv killers! Before telling why, I wish to express my surprise at how people – including those in TV debates did not see some basic facts in this issue.



Technically speaking, all that Jayalalithaa did was to have seized upon the suggestion the SC verdict had given that the State Government can exercise its remission powers under Section 432 and 433 Cr.P.C. by following due procedure in law. Her mistake was that she didn’t follow the due procedures in securing the remission perhaps due to the fact the results of such procedures are not binding on the Government. Even now the SC in its note of stay on the release of the killers had not said that the killers must not be released, but only said that there are procedural lapses in securing the remission, thereby implying that once the due procedure is in place, the remission of the killers will not be a problem or cannot stopped. Whether this applies to 3 killers who applied for mercy or all  7 killers is another issue – but going by the trend in SC verdicts, the 20+ long years of incarceration of them seems to weigh in favour of their release.

 


Can Jayalalithaa be faulted for this move as being political and aimed at greater National role?


There is of course something political but not the way that media in rest of India thinks. The SC verdict came at a time when DMDK was making secret parlays to Congress that could result in an alliance between DMDK, Congress and DMK. This is certainly the most wretched alliance that must not be allowed to take any advantage in the hustling based on the supposed vote share of these parties. The best way to make it not happen is to make it difficult for DMDK to hobnob with Congress. This verdict giving room for the State Govt to release the killers, if done immediately would blow up emotional reactions which Rahul expectedly did, followed by his party men – least thinking of the support his mother had given long ago by asking for clemency for the killers and his sister had timed a visit to one of the killers (Nalini) in the prison to make up a pro-Tamil image. The rest of India and the media had forgotten all that.

 


Now with Rahul-led Congress crying foul over the release of the killers, the anger against Congress is growing further in TN and it is impossible for DMDK -Vijaykanth to side with Congress! With election schedule likely to be announced anytime now, there is no time for Vijaykanth to work out new strategies on alliances. His fate is almost sealed by this move by Jayalalithaa.



Jayalalithaa  knows pretty well that this decision will be challenged in court. Things are going as per her plan I believe. That is seen by the way she / her Govt was cool in responding that she would abide by the court! She would claim that she did not act on her own when she passed the order of remission, but on the court’s suggestion and now she would say that she would wait for what the court is going to say. Either way she had worked for “Tamil” cause far better and higher than anyone in the fray! But the real dividend lies in having isolated DMDK.



By now she would have gotten used to thinking on two sides for any one thing, as it has become a habit for the opposition parties to go to court for whatever she does. Tamil nadu ranks the highest in India in court cases against Govt decisions. That works to her advantage as she is by now very much trained in thinking way ahead of all others. The current issue is one such thought-out strategy. She knows that it will be challenged in court, though the outcome of releasing the killers had been perfectly legitimised by the court verdict in a succinct way. Why go through the procedure in the first hand when there is an opportunity in shattering an alliance before it is made? She did that and Congress reacted expectedly – resulting in a fresh snowballing of public opinion against Congress  that left less room for DMDK to align with Congress at least for now – or until this is in people’s memory.



To call this as though this is against the interest of the nation is selective memory or hypocrisy.



Suppose if DMK had been in power now, do you think DMK would be keeping quiet? Both DMK and Congress would have worked hand in glove to release the killers. Sonia or Rahul would have made the first appeal to release them.



Now they are not in power in TN to draw this advantage, Congress is making noises while  DMK chief is trying to take credit that he was the first one to have batted for the release of the killers long ago.



People must remember that the day before Jayalalithaa passed this order, supposedly for political gains, Congress has just done a real heinous crime of dividing a State for political gains. Is that not real danger to nation’s integrity? No court, no party and no one could stop that which is going to herald a new season of fragmentation of the country. There is proverb in Tamil “Maamiyaar udaitthaal maN kudam: maattup peN udaitthaal pon kudam” (pot broken by the mother -in -law is after all mud pot. But if the same pot is broken by the daughter- in- law, a big hue and cry will be raised as though she had broken a golden pot). Jayalalithaa is the daughter-in-law in the proverb!



Coming to this issue, Jayalalithaa was the least politicking person initially. She was sincere when she wanted to enforce discipline and work culture in Govt offices, but she was severely criticised for that. She had the guts to bring in anti conversion law, but no one backed it. She did something which only a Buddha could do when she banned animal sacrifices in temples. But she was highly criticised and was forced to retract. This country and its people didn’t have a conscience beating for these issues. The lesson is that one has to go in the way that others go. She learnt that in this tenure and as someone remarked aptly, she has only herself to surpass. She used it to break the evil axis of DMK-Congress-DMDK. 



I said in the beginning that Jayalalithaa’s action had stirred up the Nation’s conscience.

Yes, the collective conscience of what is good for the country was not heard when Congress was allowing voices for pro-killers or pro-LTTE to gain momentum, was allowing Elam Tamil issue to scuttle Indian foreign policy, was allowing Karunanidhi to play politics over all that, had Sonia pitch for clemency for the killers, had Priyanka pay a visit to Nalini in prison, and MORE THAN ALL THESE delay the mercy petitions of the killers for nearly a decade purely for political considerations. If this issue on Rajiv killers had come to this level, it is because of the way mercy petitions were sat upon or disposed only in accordance with political calculations of the Congress party.



The collective conscience of the country did not even seem to exist when the Congress Govt politically timed the execution of Kazab and Afzal Guru. In effect, emotions and politikings have been allowed to grow to the current level mainly due to the ways that Congress party had chosen for extracting mileages from whatever it does.



The Nation and the National media did not wake up on those times. But now they have woken up when Jayalalithaa did a thing. The Nation or the media did not even know that all life prisoners (murderers and criminals) were released every year on Annadurai’s birthday by Karunanidhi during his last tenure. Jayalalithaa too did it in her first tenure but did not repeat it in subsequent tenures. She only stopped karunanidhi’s order after she resumed office in the current tenure. The Nation’s conscience was nowhere seen on those occasions.



It’s good that it is woken up now. May that remain vigilant in all issues of politicking done by all parties starting from the oldest party to the latest entrant, AAP!

 

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Throne from India, among the ivory things that Prince William wants to destroy.




In a bid to send a strong message against elephant poaching and illegal trading in ivory goods, Prince William of Britain has called for destroying all the 1200 items of ivory in the possession of the Buckingham Palace.  Without going into the merits and demerits of destroying finer art pieces, I wish to focus attention of the ivory art works taken from India by the British people during their colonial occupation. 


Royal collection: There are over 1,200 items in the Royal Collection which are listed as containing ivory, including this throne and footstool which comes from India and dates to 1850


Though killing innocent animals for the ivory is terribly bad, I am of the opinion that ancient Indian goods of ivory were not made from poached elephants. There is a verse from Sangam age Tamil text, “Nedu nal vaadai” on how ivory was procured for making the Royal cot for the queen of the Pandiyan King Nedum chezhiyan.  The elephant having drum-like legs and had crossed 40 years of age and had served in battle field until then was considered as the right candidate for ivory. Its tusk that has fallen on its own from this elephant is ideal for making the cot.  The tusks taken from dead or killed elephants were not suitable for making art works. That was the norm of choice for ivory in India where poaching was not reported in the past. Many such rare products had left India, some of them finding a place in Buckingham Palace.


The British Royal family came to possess numerous art works on ivory from many of the overseas countries and kingdoms in the past centuries. I don’t think those works also would have been made through cruel means (of getting the tusk). In all fairness, the British Royal family must return these goods to the original owners wherever the owner countries had been identified. As for the throne and other items taken from India, they must be returned to India and not destroyed. 

-Jayasree


From

Prince William 'wants to destroy ALL of Queen's ivory collection to set an example for other world leaders'

Prince William has vowed to destroy all 1,200 ivory artefacts in Buckingham Palace to 'send a message' to illegal elephant poachers.

The priceless collection includes a throne from India that belonged to Queen Victoria, as well as fans, tankards, statuettes, and furniture. 

But sources close to the prince say he feels strongly about putting 'his money where his mouth is'. If successful, he will go on to urge other heads of state to follow suit.

A long-term supporter of animal rights charities, the Duke of Cambridge makes regular speeches imploring world leaders to adopt a 'zero tolerance' policy towards illegal poaching in the lucrative trade.
On Thursday, he joined his father Prince Charles to a summit in London urging industry members to 'follow the money' to chase the brutal gangs, just days after the pair released a multi-lingual appeal for people to condemn illegal poaching across the world.

At home in Clarence House, William is said to have ordered for all ivory items to be hidden from sight for years.
Speaking at a conference last year, the second in line to the throne said: 'The forces that are currently destroying some of the world's most endangered species are sophisticated and powerful, but this week we are seeing the creation of an equally powerful alliance, coming together to help fight them.'
The royal collection now under threat mainly consists of gifts handed to the Queen by leaders across the world.



Palace sources insist they were all acquired 'in full knowledge of relevant legislation'.

The princes have been over to Africa to survey the stockpiles of elephant tusks collated from gangs


However, experts have hailed the suggestion as a powerful move that will have significant impact.
'It's difficult to imagine a stronger symbol of the horrors of ivory than Buckingham Palace publicly destroying its own,' Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith told the Independent on Sunday.
'Good for Prince William for pushing this.'
However, the move, the latest in a number of bids by the prince to protect elephants, has sparked outrage in the art world as experts claim destroying works 'of the highest order' is 'menacing'.

The royal collection mainly consists of gifts handed to the Queen by leaders across the world.
Brian Sewell, art critic and elephant-protection supporter, told the Independent on Sunday: 'We have to recognise that [these items] exist. 

'Ivory was a treasured material that was worked on by craftsmen of the highest order during the Renaissance... It's pointless.

'I can't see the connection between saving elephants and destroying works of art made centuries ago.'