Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Symbolism of Unicorn in Sanatana Dharma

In one of his recent write-ups (published in this blog as previous post), Dr David Frawley has analyzed the significance of the image of Unicorn that is found in many seals unearthed in the Harappan sites of Indus- Saraswathy civilization.

http://www.vedanet.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=180&Itemid=2

Though I have found most of his views on Hinduism as acceptable, a few expressed by him in this particular article make me think that there is something he has missed.

Let me write here the other side of explanation for some of the issues he has written.

What are Unicorns?

First of all, this article is about finding out what the image of Unicorn in the seals indicate.

Since there is increasing evidence that Harappan civilization is post- Vedic or an extension of Vedic culture that found a decline after Mahabharatha war or with the onset of Kali yuga, it is but logical that we have to look at Vedic concepts and practices to know what probably this unicorn meant.

Unicorns are not to be found in our times, yet they have been talked about as having existed in those days. Though most people tend to dismiss the unicorn as a mythological creation, there is mention of it in writings of notable ones.

Aristotle has told about it as 'Indian ass' with a single horn found in India

("Book 2. Chapter 1.". History of Animals, trans. D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson)

Leonardo da Vinci has described this animal and also about the methods to capture it.

"The unicorn, through its intemperance and not knowing how to control itself, for the love it bears to fair maidens forgets its ferocity and wildness; and laying aside all fear it will go up to a seated damsel and go to sleep in her lap, and thus the hunters take it."

This description of unicorn as being intemperate, ferocious and not easy to go nearby, yet can be captured with aid of a beautiful maiden is the widely held view about Unicorns. When an unicorn sights a beautiful maiden, it would become mild and soft in behavior and would lay on her lap.

Interestingly this description tallies with only one character from Hindu texts – and not with the description given by Dr Frawley equating it with none other than the Avatara moorthy, Varaha!

The 'shringa' as Unicorn!

This character from Valmiki Ramayana is an inevitable one, such that if not for him Ramayana would not have happened!

It is "Rishya shringa", the Rishi with a horn (!) who was invited by Dasaratha to conduct Puthra kaameshti yaaga for begetting children.

The story of this sage as given in Valmiki Ramayana tallies with the behavior of a Unicorn!

http://www.valmikiramayan.net/bala/sarga10/bala_10_frame.htm

This sage was raised in a forest hermitage with no exposure to women and urban people. He had lived on nature's food only and was intensely engaged in tapas and vedic knowledge. He was rough, rude and lacked knowledge of manners etc. But his dharmic knowledge and caliber was such that his entity into a city reeling under draught, could bring bountiful rain fall! Romapada, the king of Anga desa wanted his presence in his country facing water crisis, and he employed the method of capturing Unicorns to bring this sage to his city. Beautiful damsels were sent to lure him. And when he followed them to the city, to be received by the king, his anger at being duped was offset by offering the beautiful daughter of Romapada to him as wife.

In this episode, the question is whether he really had a horn, as his name suggests.

Rishya shringa, means the rishi with shringa.

Shringa means horn.

We find the name 'Maha shringa' as a name of Vishnu in Vishnu sahasranama (verse 57)

as having a huge horn!

Vishnu has had horns in two of his 10 incarnations

one as Matsya and another as Varaha.

In Adhi Shankara's interpretation of this naama,

it denotes matsya avatara

where the Lord towed the boat tied to His big horn with Satyavrata in it and

sported Himself in the pralaya waters.

Maha shringa also demotes Lord Varaha who lifted the earth from the waters (pralaya) with His horn.

The talk of Shringa does not end these two avatars.

Even Sri Rama was praised by Brahmaadi devatas as

Varaha the "Eka shringa" (one-horned) who lifted Bhoodevi.

(Valimiki Ramayana, Yuddha khanda 117- 14)

In many places in sankrit texts, there is qualified mention of Varaha as

"Eka shringo Varaha:"

From Skanda puranam we learn that Varaha had 2 shringas –

described as huge tooth-like protrusions.

With one he lifted up the landmass and with another he lifted mountains.

This terrified the devas who pacified him with prayers and praises.

Accepting their prayers, Varaha discarded his second tooth and

from thenceforth became Eka shringa.

Here we don't find any resemblance to unicorn behavior,

though it may be argued that with Bhoodevi,

a beautiful maiden with him now, he was cooled down.

But the comparison with unicorn ends here and

any further facet of Varaha in the image of Unicorn is wholly symbolic

of Sanatana dharma which was carried on in the image of unicorn

by the post vedic society.

Shringa also means 'peak' and the sages who were shining in brilliance

were seen to be glowing with an aura above their head.

This perhaps could be the rationale for Rishya shringa's name.

The sages were not known to have tolerated the slightest mis demeanor –

hence the rude behavior.

And the sages were known for a sudden weakness for women -

perhaps due to their extreme seclusion from thoughts on women

and pleasures from them.

The parallel for this behavior is found in devas and in Devendra,

who have exhibited a weakness for the fairer sex.

This is ingrained in them as known from the meaning of 'da' (giving)

described in Brihadaaranyaka Upanishad. (5-2.1to3) (1)

It is because extreme obsession with something is threatened by the same thing.

The devas and sages are extremely obsessed with controlling their senses.

In a sudden spurt of weakness,

they fall prey to the sense that they have striven to control.

Rig Veda on Vrishakapi!

In this context too, I don't find Varaha falling in line with unicorn

or the likes of Rishya shringa.

For this I take inputs from the Rig vedic hymn on Vrisha kapi,

the one –horned Varaha (10-86)

Dr Frawley finds the meaning of Vrisha as Vrishabha, the bull or the male factor

and Kapi as the horn.

I differ from this explanation.

Kapi is about the colour, the tawny colour of Varaha which is associated with him.

Vrisha is the male of any animal and not just about the bull.

The Lord describes himself as Vrishakapi at 2 places in Shanthi parva

and not at one place as Dr Frawley has quoted.

Krishna describes his various names to Arjuna and says this name -

The tawny colored Varaha is the highest Dharma,

therefore Kashyapa called me Vrisha kapi.

It is interesting to note here that Kashyapa was the grand father of Rishya shringa!

(Is Kashyapa going around giving titles with specific obsession with Shringa?!)

The many names that Krishna says here are about how each of his name is associated with a specific trait or feat of him.

The world was under water once.

He reached (avindam) the earth called 'Go'.

Therefore he is known as Govindan.

Shipivishta

In this context, the next feat to follow is permeating the whole earth.

So the next name he says is about how he has permeated.

He is 'Shipivishta'.

Here he recalls Yaska who is known for the best Nirukta

written to interpret the vedic terminologies.

This is a crucial name because the interpretation is something unique

of the kind of Yaska nirukktam.

He has permeated the earth like the rays of the sun as how

the rays enter all the pores of the body (of hair roots)

This is here I differ from Dr Frawley as the description given by Acharyas

to the same name 'Shipivishta' of Vishnu sahasranama (verse 29) is different.

Dr Frawley has given the same translation which I find in my old book

with Tamil translation.

"71. "Shipivishta is the name of he who has no hair. By that I enter into whatever there is and am known as Shipivishta."

72. "The great rishi Yaska lauded me as such in many sacrifices. For this reason I came to bear this secret name."

73. "Lauding me as Shipivishta, Yaska the Rishi of high mind, from my grace, received the lost Nirukta"

The translation I have says in the foot note that hairlessness means –

'no figure' - 'no-roopam'.

He as one without a body, has entered all beings.

But this will open a different frame of arguments and counter arguments

with reference to God without body or with a body .

Whereas Sri Bhattar's explanation for this name in Vishnu sahasranama,

quoting the same Yaska gives a more convincing explanation.

He says,

Sipayah - raSmayah, tAn sampravishTah - vyAptavAn iti SipivishTah.

He quotes Yaska from nirukata to support this –

Sipayo raSmayah ucyante, taih AvishTah

(It must be noted the next name in Vishnu sahasranama goes along with Shipivishta.

It is "Prakaashana:" the glowing one.)

The Shanthi parva verse and a similar verse from Udhyoga parva

Are interpreted as the rays of the Sun permeating everything.

Therefore he is Shipivishta!

Another interpretation for this word in AmarakoSa is given like this –

Sipishu paSushu janeshu vishTo vyApta iti SipivishTah –

One who has pervaded all animals and humans is SipivishTah.

The pervasion or permeation happens like the rays of the sun

which resemble tawny colour (kapila) of the hair on the body of Varaha!

This kind of an explanation is deep and detailed,

making Krishna to recall Yaska – the genius in interpretations,

who worshiped the Lord as Shipivishta in all homas!

Mention of 'Homa' brings the rationale of calling Varaha as "Yajna varaha".

One rationale can be that Varaha signified yajna, as Krishna has indicated in Gita

about the continuous Yajna being done from Creation onwards.

The recovery of Bhoomi is the staring point and

from then onwards creation is sustained by continuous yajna.

This is initiated by the Lord Himself, since the first act he did after lifting up bhoomi

is to start Pitru tarpaN – a yajna for ancestors!

In the continuing chapters in Shanthi parva,

the Lord describes again how he as Varaha lifted up the earth.

At the time the noon neared and he had to offer noon-oblations.

But 3 lumps of earth were sticking to his horn which he shook off.

They settled in the South which he designated as the 3 levels of pithrus

and did the first pithru tarpan in the earth's history.

Varaha in such a mode of sustaining Dharma is known as Vrishakapi,

says He in that chapter.

The fight between Senses and Dharma!

A recurrent narration of Varaha as Dharma embodiment (Vrishakapi)

seems to have the rationale for why the Unicorn had found a place in Vedic civilization!

Vrisha in Vrisha kapi is Vrishbha –

but not as Dr Frawley thinks linking it to male factor!

Such a description of male factor can be debated from

the Jyothisha point of view of Taurus, the Bull.

Whereas the Rig Vedic hymn on Indra and Vrishakapi seems to tell

a story of fight between Indriyas (senses)

denoted by Indra and Dharma as personified by Vrishakapi. (2)

In Vedic hymns and in Vaastu padas,

the lord of the east is Indra and west is Vrishabha.

They are always opposed to each other in Jyothishic point of view also.

They are like opposite poles, attracting and repelling each other.

The balance must be maintained between them.

When Indra wins, it is a defeat for Dharma or Vrishabha.

The hymn is a glorification of Indra as how he only (sensory perceptions) wins

on most occasions.

But if one drinks Soma (means Moon, the power of mind and intellect),

he will win over Indra.

In the opening verse Vrishakapi is said to have drunk Soma full.

That means He is full of Dharmic sense.

He is like a beast troubling people who want to be controlled by Indra.

The following verse from this hymn in Rig veda,

seems to indicate the victory of Vrishakapi.

But in a mystic tone to delude the people,

it is said that the beast of Vrishakapi has slain a wild animal –

it is slain because it has come out of the grip of Indra (senses)

Who this slain one- a noble one or not – is left to the wisdom of the onlooker / reader.

But the so-called slain one is wise and has drunk Soma.

But the world goes Indra way. Hail Indra!

***************************************

"18 O Indra this Vrsakapi hath found a slain wild animal, Dresser, and new-made pan, and knife, and wagon with a load of wood. Supreme is Indra over all. 19 Distinguishing the Dasa and the Arya, viewing all, I go. I look upon the wise, and drink the simple votary's Soma juice. Supreme is Indra over all."

****************************************

Vrishakapi as permeator of all beings, keeps off Indra from the one who has realized

His presence in him!

This is a core Sanatanic principle!

Such a feat of Vrishakapi is comparable to Him as Varaha

who lifted up the earth from deluge, from darkness of Ignorance.

A Sanatanic practice is to remember such feats in the objects related

to the same rationale.

The different forms of different gods is due to this rationale.

So whenever the Unicorn is thought of,

the need to adhere to Dharma is remembered.

And vice versa.

Dharma is tough like the unicorn's temper.

Dharma is attracted to Bhoo devi, the earth (earthlings)

as how the unicorn is attracted to a maiden.

Dharma protects the one who is protective towards it,

like how the unicorn is protective of the maiden who gives a place for it in her lap.

It is Vrisha – as opposed to Indriya-attractions.

The war is always on between the two.

Vrisha does not excel in Taurus as per astrology.

Venus, the lord of Taurus exalts in Meena (matsyavatara)

in the house of the upright Jupier.

And Venus, the female factor has given its other house, its Moola trikona,

namely Libra to Saturn, to exalt!

Saturn holds the Balance and stands for Justice.

Where he exalts, the king deflates.

It is in Libra where Saturn exalts, the Sun debilitates!

No king or powerful authority can shake Dharma.

No power in the world can shake Dharma

who is firmly posited in the house

in front of the Bull!

Again another pointer from astrology.

The Varaha or Vrishakapi or Unicorn symbolizes the play of God

who is Dharma personified, to Earth.

Sage Parashara in his Brihad Parashara Hora sastra describes the association

of avatars to planets.

It is significant to note that the two serpent planets are associated

with the 2 Eka shringa.

Rahu is associated with Varaha

and Ketu with Matsya!

Rahu is associated with earth –

any offence to earth results in Rahu dosha.

The first rule to be adhered to before starting digging for foundation,

is to see if Rahu is offended on that particular day / month, in that particular time.

A house started with an offence to Rahu will not give peaceful life.

Varaha signifying Rahu, is the protector on earth.

Whereas Matsya, the other eka-shringi, is a protector on water.

The eka shringi is like an amulet that protects one both on land and in water.

Besides this, it is a constant remainder to follow dharma.

No wonder this would have been part of Santana thought for ages

and was followed in the Saraswad civilization.

Now a question comes, if Varaha as an Unicorn is an important symbol,

why it did not continue with our continuing civilization.

The answer can be traced to the slokas / verses on Varaha,

particularly the Varaha Charama sloka which was ruling the Sanatanic world

for ages in antiquity.

Details of the sloka from Varaha puranam can be read here:-

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2525551/varaha-puranam

Varaha vs Krishna

The world of a Sanatanist is like this – pre - Krishna and post-krishna.

The Varaha mantra was the ruling sloka for salvation in pre-Krishna period,

which was replaced by the Krishna charama sloka from Gita

(sarva dharmaan parithyajya,.. BG 18 -66)

in the post- Krishna period and is continuing even today.

In Varaha- salvation manthra, the Lord Varaha will remember one at his hour of death - even though the person will be incapable of remembering him then.

There is no conditional clause here.

The qualities expected are belief in god as root cause,

as one who commands from within,

as the all pervasive, Ultimate who is near us all the time

and as one who alone is to be worshiped –

these qualities of bhakthi will do.

But with the onset of Kali, when only one fourth of dharma can be practiced,

there is no use telling people to be 100% Dharmic.

The prescription for this scenario is given by Krishna to just give up everything,

and dedicate to Lord even the bad act to be done.

The Lord will take such a person out of the cycle of rebirth

and lift him up to Parama padam.

Post Krishna, Varaha charama sloka gradually lost its place,

only to be replaced by Krishna charama sloka.

The Saraswad people, in my opinion were in the transition period,

a time when Krishna cult had not completely taken over the masses.

As Kali advanced further with adharma spreading its tentacles,

Krishna dharma of giving up the fruits of all dharmas

had come to occupy the centre stage of all Sanatanic preachings

Related post:-

http://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2008/12/unicorn-of-indus-seals.html

************************************

Foot notes:-

(1) Taking up the root of the word 'daanam',

it is explained in Brihadaaranyaka Upanishad. (5-2.1to3)

The root word is 'da'

The 3 sons of Prajapathi, (devas, manushyas / humans and asuras)

on completion of their Brahmacharya-hood

approaches Prajapathi asking for a piece of advice from him.

To the Devas, he said, 'da' as his advice.

They understood it as "daamyathethi"

It means 'control of the senses'.

Since devas are known for lack of control over indriyas / senses,

they understood 'da' as control of the senses.

By controlling their senses

the devas can prosper.

To the humans, Prajapathi said, 'da'.

Since humans have a weakness in greediness,

they understood it as 'dattha' (give )

Dattha is root word of daanam.

By giving daanam, the humans can prosper.

To the asuras, Prajapathi said, 'da'.

Since asuras have an irresistible tendency to harm others,

they understood it as 'dayathvam' – merciful.

By being kind to others, the asuras can prosper.

Here the 3 sons are personification of human beings only,

with three dominant traits, says Adi shankara in his commentary.

(2) HYMN LXXXVI. Indra. ( Rig veda chapter 10)

1. MEN have abstained from pouring juice they count not Indra as a God.

Where at the votary's store my friend Vrsakapi hath drunk his fill. Supreme is Indra over all.

2 Thou, Indra, heedless passest by the ill Vrsakapi hath wrought;

Yet nowhere else thou findest place wherein to drink the Soma juice. Supreme is Indra over all.

3 What hath he done to injure thee, this tawny beast Vrsakapi,

With whom thou art so angry now? What is the votary's foodful store? Supreme is Indra over all.

4 Soon may the hound who hunts the boar seize him and bite him in the car,

O Indra, that Vrsakapi whom thou protectest as a friend, Supreme is Indra over all.

5 Kapi hath marred the beauteous things, all deftly wrought, that were my joy.

In pieces will I rend his head; the sinner's portion sball be woo. Supreme is Indra over all.

6 No Dame hath ampler charms than 1, or greater wealth of love's delights.

None with more ardour offers all her beauty to her lord's embrace. Supreme is Indra over all.

7 Mother whose love is quickly wibn, I say what verily will be.

My,breast, O Mother, and my head and both my hips seem quivering. Supreme is Indra over all.

8 Dame with the lovely hands and arms, with broad hair-plaits add ample hips,

Why, O thou Hero's wife, art thou angry with our Vrsakapi? Supreme is Indra over all.

9 This noxious creature looks on me as one bereft of hero's love,

Yet Heroes for my sons have I, the Maruts' Friend and Indra's Queen. Supreme is Indra over all.

10 From olden time the matron goes to feast and general sacrifice.

Mother of Heroes, Indra's Queen, the rite's ordainer is extolled. Supreme is Indra over all.

11 So have I heard Indrani called most fortunate among these Dames,

For never shall her Consort die in future time through length of days. Supreme is Indra overall.

12 Never, Indralni, have I joyed without my friend Vrsakapi,

Whose welcome offering here, made pure with water, goeth to the Gods. Supreme is Indra over all.

13 Wealthy Vrsakapayi, blest with sons and consorts of thy sons,

Indra will eat thy bulls, thy dear oblation that effecteth much. Supreme is Indra over all.

14 Fifteen in number, then, for me a score of bullocks they prepare,

And I devour the fat thereof: they fill my belly full with food. Supreme is Indra over all.

15 Like as a bull with pointed horn, loud bellowing amid the herds,

Sweet to thine heart, O Indra, is the brew which she who tends thee pours. Supreme is Indra over all.

18 O Indra this Vrsakapi hath found a slain wild animal,

Dresser, and new-made pan, and knife, and wagon with a load of wood. Supreme is Indra over all.

19 Distinguishing the Dasa and the Arya, viewing all, I go.

I look upon the wise, and drink the simple votary's Soma juice. Supreme is Indra over all.

20 The desert plains and steep descents, how many leagues in length they spread!

Go to the nearest houses, go unto thine home, Vrsakapi. Supreme is Indra over all.

21 Turn thee again Vrsakapi: we twain will bring thee happiness.

Thou goest homeward on thy way along this path which leads to sleep. Supreme is Indra over all.

22 When, Indra and Vrsakapi, ye travelled upward to your home,

Where was that noisome beast, to whom went it, the beast that troubles man? Supreme is Indra over all.

23 Daughter of Manu, Parsu bare a score of children at a birth.

Her portion verily was bliss although her burthen caused her grief.

Unicorn of the Indus seals.

 


 

 

(This is the article by Dr David Frawley on the meaning of Unicorns found in Indus Saraswad excavations.)


Krishna and the Unicorn of the Indus Seals

Written by Dr. David Frawley
(Vamadeva Shastri, http://www.vedanet.com/)

 

http://www.vedanet.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=180&Itemid=2

 

 


(The article is a part of a new book of the author
on the Indus Seals. The seal images come from Sasravati Epigraphs of
S. Kalyanaraman. The numbering of verses from the Mahabharata is from
the Gita Press edition, translations by the author.)



The Indus seals constitute the written records of the 'Indus Valley'
or 'Harappan civilization', India's oldest civilization. The Indus
civilization was contemporary with the great civilizations of the
ancient Near East in Egypt and Mesopotamia. Though not always made as
important in history books, it was the largest urban civilization
that existed in the ancient world in the third millennium BC,
dwarfing the Near Eastern civilizations in size and in the uniformity
and continuity of its remains.


The Indus civilization has also been called the 'Indus-Sarasvati
civilization'
because the great majority of its sites were located on
the now dried banks of the Sarasvati River, a once great river that
flowed east of the Indus and whose termination around 1900 BCE
appears to correspond to the last phase of this great civilization.
Sometimes it is called the 'Harappan civilization', after the name of
Harappa, one of its first large sites discovered (though to date
there are at least five larger sites found over the years).



There is so far no generally agreed upon decipherment of the Indus
script, though several attempts have been made along the lines of
Sanskritic and Dravidian languages. However, the Indus seals feature
a number of important and dramatic images that may provide the key to
the people and the ideas behind the culture, and which have not been
given adequate attention. The purpose of this article is to look at
the images themselves and what they tell us.



The Harappan images actually reflect the main images of later Indian
art with figures in seated meditation, sacred bulls, pipal leaf
designs and even swastikas. While there has been some doubt cast as
to the continuity of Indus civilization into later India, the
Harappan images are distinctly Indian already.



Yet curiously, the most common image by far on the Indus seals, is
that of a unicorn, a purely symbolic animal, which largely
disappeared from the iconography of later
India. Other mythical and
multiheaded animals abound on the seals, as well as many wild
animals, but few domestic creatures are found. Even the human figures
that do rarely occur are of deities or yogis in meditation poses and
may have multiple heads or animal heads.
Clearly the Indus seal
images reflect mainly a spiritual concern and cannot be simply looked
upon for a portrayal of the actual animals or the daily life of the
Harappan people
. Many local animals of India, which were common even
then, do not appear on them at all, including dogs, onagers, monkeys
and peacocks.


The Indus or Harappan unicorn always has a strange device like a
cauldron always placed to its front, associating it with some
sacrificial ritual. This device has been interpreted as an incense
burner, fire altar or Soma filter. The seal is obviously primarily of
religious value, not simply an artistic image much less a zoological
representation.



The inscriptions found along with the image vary greatly, suggesting
that the image was more of overall symbolic value than directly
related to the message of the script in each instance. This is also
suggested by the frequency with which the image occurs.


More notably, the head of the animal varies quite a bit in its
presentation and may be broad or narrow, full or crimped. The neck
also may be shorter or longer.



The body may be shorter or longer as well. Sometimes the animal
appears more like a young creature, other times as mature.


These variations appear not just as differences in artistic approach
but a rather different idea of the actual form of the animal, which
does not seem to reflect any single species. The Harappan unicorn
almost appears like an all-in-one animal, or a singular animal that
represents a number of primary sacred animals. However, the stance of
the animal and the cauldron like vessel in front of it remain
remarkably uniform. Note further variations on the unicorn images
presented  here, which demonstrate such differences in the animal
itself as well as the inscriptions above it.


The question arises as to what this strange unicorn indicates and
whether it has any counterpart in the ancient literature and
traditions of
India, particularly in the Vedas and Puranas that
contain the oldest records of the spiritual life of the Indian
people. In this article we will look into these literary connections,
which are quite extensive.


Though not easy to find, there are references to a very prominent
unicorn animal in the Mahabharata, the great epic which centers on
the life of Krishna. In fact the unicorn called Ekashringa or one
(eka) horned (shringa) apppears as the highest animal image of the
Divine. It appears as a prime symbol of Vishnu-Krishna and the Vedic
and Yogic knowledge he taught. The unicorn connected to the Varaha
avatara or boar incarnation of Lord Vishnu, with which Krishna is
also aligned, but which in the Mahabharata is connected to the bull
as well as the boar.



The Mahabharata Shanti Parva contains a section that seems to be
quite old and which recounts the main names and forms of Vishnu-
Krishna, which it connects with the ancient Nirukta or etymology of
terms. It is also the main section in the epic that deals with the
unicorn. It is taught by Krishna (Vasudeva) himself as a revelation
of his own most important names, attributes and associations.



We must thank noted Vedic scholar Natwar Jha for drawing attention to
this important section of the text and N.S. Rajaram for highlighting
it. Let us examine it further to the image of the unicorn.



Mahabharata, Shanti Parva 342

6-7: Arjuna asks, "Your names that are praised by the seers, in the
Vedas and in the Puranas, and which are secret by their actions. I
want you to declare their meaning (niruktam). There is no one else
like you who can relate the meaning of your names."
8.-10. Krishna replies: "In the Rigveda, Yajurveda, Atharvaveda,
Samaveda, Puranas, Upanishads, in astrology, in Samkhya, Yoga and
Ayurveda, many are my names that are praised by the seers. Some of
these names are by attributes and others by actions. The meaning
(nirukta) of those born of action, listen with attention."

Clearly these names are very important, very ancient and cover all
branches of Vedic knowledge.


Mahabharata, Shanti Parva 343

A specific explication (niruktam) of Krishna's names begins with
verse 67 and includes Govinda (verse 70). We will go over a few
relevant portions leading up to the unicorn.

71. "Shipivishta is the name of he who has no hair. By that I enter
into whatever there is and am known as Shipivishta."
72. "The great rishi Yaska lauded me as such in many sacrifices. For
this reason I came to bear this secret name."
73. "Lauding me as Shipivishta, Yaska the Rishi of high mind, from my
grace, received the lost Nirukta."


These verses relate to the Nirukta of Yaska, the famous text for
determining the meaning of the Vedic mantras. The meaning here is
that there was an earlier Nirukta that was lost, which Yaska
recovered at least in part. Shipivishta is a name of Indra and Varuna
from the Rig Veda, VII.99 and 100, among the hymns of the great rishi
Vasishta. The statement about Yaska indicates that this section of
the Mahabharata is a kind of condensed Nirukta or explanation of
Vedic mantras and that it contains some very important lost ancient
secrets.



79. "I till the earth, having become like great like a mass of hard
iron. From that is my black color. Thus I am Krishna."

Even the name Krishna is explained in this section. It relates to
agriculture as the root `krish' for Krishna also refers to tilling
the ground. The boar is the only hoofed animal that digs the ground.
Hence it has a possible symbolic connection with agriculture as well.
Now we will go forward to the main names that connect Krishna-Vishnu
with the unicorn.


88. "Vrisha (the Bull or Male) is Bhagavan Dharma, famous in the
worlds. In the Nighantuka (ancient lexicon), know me as the supreme
Bull or male (vrisha uttamam)."
89. "The Kapi (horned) Varaha (boar) is said to be the highest dharma
and the bull or male (vrisha). Hence Kashyapa Prajapati calls me
Vrisha Kapi."



Dharma is generally symbolized in Hindu thought by the bull,
vrishabha. The related term vrisha, not only means bull but also male
and strong. It need not always refer to a bovine creature, though
that image is usually in the background as the prime image.



However, in this section of the Mahabharata, the highest Vrisha or
supreme male is not a bull, vrishabha, but a varaha, which usually
meant a boar. One could say that the boar is the supreme form of the
bull or male animal. Note that it is this supreme male principle or
Vrisha that is lauded as the boar or bull here, not the specific
animal per se. The Varaha is not simply a boar as an animal but part
of the symbolism of the supreme male principle of Dharma, the Purusha
or cosmic spirit, which is Vishnu-Krishna.


This supreme male or vrisha is further connected to Vrisha Kapi of
the Vedas, who is lauded as a special companion to Indra, the
foremost of the Vedic Gods. Vishnu himself in the Vedas is called
Upendra or associated with Indra. Vrisha Kapi is also said to be a
special vrisha and a boar. Vrisha Kapi occurs in the tenth mandala of
the Rig Veda (RV X.86)
and is one of the later hymns. Kapi is
considered here to mean a horn and Vrisha, the male principle or
bull.


Indra, the supreme Vedic deity, is generally lauded as Vrisha and as
a bull, Vrishabha. The bull is generally called vrisha, which means
both bull and male in Sanskrit, while vrishabha only means bull.



The vrisha uttama or supreme male is not just a bull but a boar. This
is because the boar is the fiercest of all animals when attacked.
That is why it became part of the coat of arms for many royal
dynasties, including some of ancient Persia to the last great Hindu
dynasty of Vijayanagar.



90-91: "The Gods and titans have never found my beginning, middle or
end. Hence I am sung as the witness of the world, the Lord, the
pervader, who has no beginning, middle or end."
92.  "Having previously become the Unicorn Boar (Ekashringa Varaha),
who increases joy, I upheld this world. Therefore I am called the
Unicorn (Ekashringa)."



Here the Unicorn (Ekashringa) is specifically mentioned, primarily as
a boar, though its overall connections with Vrisha, the male element,
more commonly symbolized by the bull, remain from the previous verses
as the supreme Vrisha. This is the boar of Dharma. It is the last and
most prominent of the names of the deity mentioned in this section,
suggesting a great importance for it. No doubt the single horn is a
symbol of unity and supremacy of the deity.


93."Then I dwelled as the form of a boar (varaha) who has three parts
(or three humps, Trikakut). By that I am known as trikakut, through
the form of my body."



The Indus seals often show the unicorn as part of a three headed
creature, generally with the other two heads as that of an antelope
and a bull, as we examined in the last chapter and as presented
below. The Mahabharata remembers this threefold form of the unicorn
boar, as trikakut, having three humps or prominences!


The Varaha as a Symbol of Vedic Knowledge

After the names of Vishnu culminating in the unicorn boar, the
following verses of this section of the Mahabharata (Shanti Parva
343) go on to laud the great Vedic teachings in all their details.
These start with Kapila and the system of Samkhya, for which he is
the originator (verse 94-95), Hiranyagarbha and the Yoga system, for
which he is the originator, (verses 96), the twenty one thousand
aspects of the Rig Veda (verse 97), the thousand branches of the Sama
Veda (verse 97), the Aranyakas (verse 98), the Yajur Veda (verse 99),
the Atharva Veda (verse 99-100). It goes on further to outline the
different aspects and methods of reciting and chanting the Vedas
(verse 100-104).


The glorification of the Unicorn ends up with a glorification of
Vedic knowledge of the four Vedas and of Samkhya and Yoga. Previously
(verses 85-86) even Ayurveda was addressed! We see the basis here of
the Yajna Varaha of the Puranas, the boar that symbolizes the Vedic
knowledge and ritual!


In other words, the Unicorn Boar or Ekashringa Varaha is the prime
form of Vishnu-Krishna and also the symbol of Vedic knowledge. This
tells us a lot about the religion of the Harappan people. That the
unicorn is a common symbol on writing inscriptions makes sense as a
Vedic symbol of speech and knowledge.



Shanti Parva 209: Vishnu as the Varaha

In this section of the Mahabharata, Vishnu as the Varaha defeats and
destroys all the demons.

16. Then Vishnu of great power assumed the form of the boar (varaha).
Entering into the Earth, he attacked the demons.
21-22.Then Vishnu as the God of Gods as the soul of Yoga and the
mover of Yoga, assuming his power of Yoga, then the Lord roared with
a great roar agitating the demons. By that roaring all the words and
the ten directions were shaken.



The boar creates a powerful great roar or nada, a sound vibration
that destroys them. This identified him with the power of mantra and
more specifically with the power of the Divine Word OM, which we must
remember is the origin of all the Vedas.



Some extended sections of the Mahabharata, apart from the numbered
versions, further use this same section to teach the great mantras OM
Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya! and Namo Narayanaya! The Varaha is
obviously here a symbol of the Vedic mantras. It shows the roar or
vibration, the mantric chant of the Supreme.



Yajna Varaha: the Sacrificial Boar



Varaha among the avatars of Vishnu is the special symbol of the Yajna
or the Vedic sacrifice. The Vishnu Purana I.IV.9 calls the Varaha
Avatara as vedayajnamaya, "of the nature of the Vedic sacrifice," and
further states I.IV.22-23: "You are the sacrifice and you are the
vashat call. You are the Om chant and you are the sacred fires. You
are the Vedas and you are the limbs of the Vedas. You are the Yajna
Purusha, the deity of the sacrifice. "



The Varaha incarnation of Lord Vishnu is the form most connected to
the Vedic sacrifice and to the preservation of the Vedas. In this
regard, the western translator of the Puranas, H. H. Wilson in his
notes on the Vishnu Purana (vol. 1, page 44, note 7) states, "The
notion that the Varaha incarnation typifies the ritual of the Vedas,
is repeated in most of the Puranas in nearly the same words."


The boar is the symbolic animal of the Vedas, not just of Vishnu. The
boar symbolizes the Vedic sacrifice more so than any other animal. In
fact, the boar is a symbol of Dharma in general and is said to be
satyadharmamaya sriman dharma vikramasamsthitah., who has the nature
of the true Dharma, the Lord of Dharma who dwells in victory, in the
Vayu Purana. This is the Yajna Varaha, the sacred or sacrificial
boar.



The Standard in Front of the Unicorn

The Harappan unicorn is always portrayed with a standard, cauldron or
filter in front of it. This can easily be equated with Vedic
sacrificial cauldrons and Soma filters. It is in any case a
sacrificial implement that connects the animal to ritualistic
activity. This devise is something we would expect with the boar as a
symbol of the Vedic Yajna or sacrifice, which is how it is presented
in the ancient literature, and confirms its meaning as such.


Govinda as the Unicorn Boar

Govinda is one of the most important names for Krishna/Vishnu that
among other things means he who finds, vinda, the Earth, go. As such,
it is sometimes associated with the Varaha, who saves the Earth after
a great flood. Another section of the Mahabharata lauds Govinda as
the boar in the same way.



Mahabharata Shanti Parva 346. 12. This earth was lost previously
surrounded by water. Govinda carried it up quickly, assuming the form
of a boar (Varaha).


13. Having stabilized the Earth in its own place, the Supreme
Purusha, with his limbs dripping with water and mud accomplished his
work for the benefit of the world.



In the Mahabharata, the varaha is the animal most associated with
Krishna. The other animal avatars of Vishnu, the fish and the
tortoise are hardly mentioned, but a number of long passages
connected Krishna as the Varaha. Krishna is said to be Purushottma or
the supreme male. Purusha is also called Vrisha. So as Vrishottama
Krishna is also the unicorn.


Some may say but is not the Harappan unicorn a unicorn bull and the
Vedic unicorn a unicorn boar?


The Harappan unicorn is sometimes portrayed more like a bull, other
times like a boar or even other creatures, just as it sometimes has
composite heads with other creatures. We have already noted the
considerable variations of the body and head of the animal. Note the
boar like images to the left.



In a few seals, the unicorn has the features of a Rhinoceros. Note a
rhinoceros like unicorn seal and rhinoceros seal below.



Clearly the unicorn is a mythic animal, not a literal representative
of a real species. When it has three heads, one is clearly a bull
with two horns. As we have noted, the Vrisha is usually the bull but
as the supreme vrisha it is also the boar, which suggests a possible
bull-boar mixture.



The Harappan unicorn may be a composite animal in a singular form, a
kind of bull and boar mix like the Vrisha term. It may include other
animals like the rhinoceros.


Many other Harappan seals show animals with human heads or multiple
body parts from various creatures. Note to the left a composite
animal with a human face, the body of a ram, horns of a bull, trunk
of an elephant, hindlegs of a tiger and an upraised serpent tail.


Then note the unicorn with a bull and a fish as his other two heads
or body parts! The same image usually appears with the unicorn, a
bull head and an antelope head. The Harappan artists were probably
trying to show the unity of different animals and their powers as
part of the cosmic being, not just delineate their physical
characteristics.



We also have the unicorn as a twin or dual form, with a curious image
that features the Ashvattha leaf. The design almost looks like a bow
on its side. NS Rajaram has interpreted this image as an OM seal, as
it resembles the OM symbol but placed on the side.



The unicorn head here appears to resemble a horse like animal,
suggesting the Ashvins or twin horsemen of the Vedas. This is not
surprising when we consider that horse bones have been found at Indus
sites, and that the onager, a horse like equine, is a common Indian
animal, roaming even today in the parts of India and Pakistan where
Indus sites can be found.



Rama and the Unicorn Boar

Rama, the other great avatar of Vishnu often invoked along with
Krishna, is also lauded as a unicorn boar in a few instances. This
occurs in the Brahmakrita Rama Stava, the `Hymn in Praise of Rama' by
Lord Brahma. Ramayana Yuddha Khanda 117.14.

"You are Narayana, the deity, the glorious wielder of the chakra, the
Lord,
You are the unicorn boar (ekashringa varaha), the destroyer of past
and future enemies."



Notice that the unicorn boar is directly identified with Narayana,
the supreme form of Vishnu as the wielder of the chakra
. The chakra
has always been a prime Vishnu symbol. There are many chakras or six-
spoked wheels found on the unicorn seals as well, largely in the
script itself. Note the nearby seal that shows a chakra on the very
neck of the unicorn.


It seems that the martial form of Vishnu is more a boar, or the
martial form of the boar may be more the one-horned form. Another
verse of this same hymn speaks of the bull (Ramayana Yuddha Khanda
117.19). "You are the thousand horned great bull, the soul of the
Veda, with a hundred heads." Curiously, while the boar is associated
with the one-horn form, the bull is associated with the thousand
horned form of what is probably the same great symbolic animal. The
Rig Veda also refers to a bull with a thousand horns (RV VII.55.7).

Shiva and the Unicorn

The Varaha is not limited to Vishnu but can refer to Shiva as well,
in which regard it may also be one-horned. Another verse from a
nearby section of the Mahabharata (Shanti Parva 341.106) proclaims to
Rudra-Shiva:

"To the one with the hair knot, to the wise, unicorn boar (ekashringa
varaha). To the Sun God, to the horse's head, who ever carries four
forms."

This shows the unicorn boar as Shiva and Surya (the Sun). It also
connects it to the horse's head, suggesting that the unicorn's head
may be related to a horse at times. Shiva or Rudra with a hair knot
or kapardin is mentioned several times in the Rig Veda. It is also a
common feature of the Shiva of the Indus seals.

The Rig Veda I.114.5 speaks of Shiva as "the boar of heaven (divo
varaha)", which may be an indication of the same unusual or heavenly
creature, and as the kapardin or with the hair tuft. The Mahabharata
mentions Vrisha Kapi, which it identifies as the one-horned boar,
with the forms of Rudra. Curiously, the Skanda Purana refers to
Vrisha Kapi as the Shasta or scriptural form of the Shiva Linga.


So while the boar connects to Vishnu most prominently, it has its
associations with Shiva as well. After all it is a prime vrisha (or
bull, male) animal of the Purusha and symbolizes the Vedas overall.
Of course, the two deities are commonly equated in the Mahabharata
and elsewhere in many other ways.


There are also a number of Harappan seals that show a three headed
deity in meditation posture surrounded by wild animals. Many scholars
have identified these seals with a Proto-Shiva as Pashupati, the Lord
of the animals. Pashupati is the main name of Shiva in the
Mahabharata, where Shaivite Yoga, perhaps represented in these seals,
is called Pashupata Yoga. So the Harappan images of Shiva are of the
same order as those of Vishnu and can similarly be found in the
Mahabharata.


Other Vedic Symbols on the Indus Seals

There are many other Vedic symbols on the Harappan seals that confirm
the Vishnu-unicorn connection. The Brahma bull, a symbol of dharma is
another common
Indus seal.  As in the next illustration.



The Brahma bull is the main form of the bull that has endured in
Indian art. The unicorn has largely disappeared, though the boar has
continued, but usually portrayed with two tusks.



Yet other Indus seals show figures like the seven rishis of Vedic
thought, in the seal to the left at the bottom. The rishis have
special hair knots, just as in the Vedic description. There are many
other such correlations that could be made.



Probably the most common design on the Indus seals is the swastika,
as shown below. It occurs in dozens of seals and sometimes aligned
with various animals like the elephant.



Conclusion

We see, therefore, that the Indus Seals reflect an early core of the
Mahabharata and a later phase of the Vedas in terms of their primary
images.They suggest that the Harappan culture is not pre-Vedic or non-
Vedic, as some have argued, but late Vedic.



The greater question arises is whether the Harappan Unicorn like the
one-horned Varaha of the Mahabharata is an actual symbol for Lord
Krishna. Or is it an image taken over by a later Krishna cult because
of its sanctity or antiquity? Since the Varaha is also the symbol of
Vedic knowledge, can we further equate the Harappan Unicorn with the
Vedic compilation of Veda Vyasa that occurred at the time of
Krishna?



We may not yet be in a position to definitely answer these questions
from the seal images along. But in any case there is nothing in the
Indus Seals that goes against the idea that Krishna lived five
thousand years ago, which would explain why a Krishna related image,
the unicorn dominates the seals. Yet even if Krishna came later, the
Mahabharata has at its core the dominant images of the Harappan
world, which if not close to Krishna would at least reflect Vishnu.



There is other corroborating evidence to consider that we have
examined in other books and articles. When we remember that the main
Indus and Harappan sites are on the Sarasvati River that dried up
around 1900 BCE and contain fire altars, the connection to the late
Vedic culture is again affirmed. The Mahabharata also recognizes the
Sarasvati as a great river in decline, which was its condition in the
Harappan era.



At the level of archaeo-astronomy, the Mahabharata and Brahmanas
contain references to the importance of Rohini and Krititika
Nakshatras, which are the stars Aldeberan and the Pleiades in the
constellation of Taurus, as by turns marking the beginning of the
Nakshatras. If these marked the vernal equinox, which they appear to
do, this also refers to the period from before 3000 BCE to around
1500 BCE or the Harappan era.


Of course, the Mahabharata has many layers and much was added later,
but its core is firmly rooted in the Harappan world. When we look at
the Indus Seals, particularly the Harappan unicorn, we must wonder if
it is an animal symbol for Krishna himself! Clearly the Mahabharata
knows of the connection.



 

 

 

 

.

Make Gulf of Mannar a sacred site, say conservationists





Make Gulf of Mannar a sacred site, say conservationists

Trevor Grundy (12 Dec., 2008)

 

http://sites.google.com/site/kalyan97/setu

http://www.scribd.com/doc/8966434/setusamudram2

http://www.eni.ch/photos/gulfmannar8.jpeg

 

London (ENI). The Alliance of Religions and Conservation, known as ARC, is backing a call for the United Nations, the World Bank, non-governmental groups and conservation bodies to recognise the Gulf of Mannar - between India and Sri Lanka - as a World Heritage Sacred Site. 


The gulf is one of the world's last remaining intact ecosystems and home of the Ram Sethu, which was known as
Adam's Bridge during the time of British colonisation. 



Legend has it that Adam, the first human being according to the sacred texts of Christians, Jews and Muslims, walked on the bridge, a chain of limestone shoals, not long after the dawn of Creation. 



"This is the one place in the world, other than the Garden of Eden, where we can say, 'this is a sacred site which reminds us of our relationship and our responsibility with the rest of creation'. It is mythologically and ecologically about as sacred as you can get," said Martin Palmer, secretary general of ARC, a secular body that helps the major religions of the world develop their own environmental programmes. 



"The
Gulf of Mannar should be nominated as one of the very first internationally significant Sacred Sites along with the Sacred Mountains of China and other such hugely holy and hugely ecologically places," Palmer told Ecumenical News International. 

Palmer spoke in late November at a two-day meeting to support a World Campaign to Save the Gulf of Mannar, a shallow stretch of water separating
India from Sri Lanka


Some 100 ecologists, academics, scientists and religious leaders from around the world who met on 25 and 26 November had sought to provide enough multi-disciplinary evidence to persuade the governments of India and Sri Lanka to ask the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization to designate the gulf a World Heritage Site. 

A conference spokesperson said that despite its important ecological and cultural significance as one of South Asia's largest biosphere reserves, the Indian government aims to build a shipping channel - the Sethusamudram Ship Channel - through the gulf, threatening endangered plant and animal species there, as well as the livelihood of local fisherfolk. The project is currently part of a legal battle in
India's Supreme Court. 


Located on the south eastern tip of the subcontinent, the
Gulf of Mannar has more 3600 species of flora and fauna, making it one of the richest coastal regions in Asia


Palmer noted,
"At the moment, we are in a classic struggle - to use Christian terminology - between God and Mammon. It's a historic struggle between those who see the world as a struggle upon which a drama of cosmological significance is played out, and those who see the planet as a large supermarket to be raided." 
Millions of Hindus believe that the bridge was lifted up to allow Lord Rama to cross from India to Sri Lanka to rescue his wife who had been imprisoned by a demon king. 


In an interview with ENI, Anil Bhanot, who heads the Hindu Council of Great Britain, said: "The call to make the
Gulf of Mannar a Sacred Site pleases us enormously. It is, of course, a site sacred to Muslims as well as to Hindus and the call in London pleases us all because this is something that unites us all." 


::
Alliance of Religions and Conservation: www.arcworld.org/ 

http://www.eni.ch/featured/article.php?id=2561

 

 

Monday, December 15, 2008

India-centric evolution of ‘Aryans’


 

This is the third and the concluding part of the series on disproving Aryan Invasion Theory written by Dr NS Rajaram and published in Organiser.

 

The Aryan myth in perspective-III

By Dr NS Rajaram

 

http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=268&page=33



The Oxford geneticist Stephen Oppenheimer is more specific and also more emphatic, focusing on the M17 or the so-called 'Caucasoid' (politically correct for 'Aryan') genetic marker.

 

Population geneticists have identified two objects that carry genetic information that is passed on from generation to generation. They are the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the Y-chromosome. mtDNA is inherited through the female line (passed on from mother to daughter) while the Y-chromosome is transmitted through the male line. There are individual quirks in these cells that are specific to regions like Africa, India, Southeast Asia and so forth. These are the genetic markers we look for. Mapping them allows us to study the possible origins of different population groups now inhabiting the globe. For example, we know that all humans living in the world today are descended from a relatively small African population because Africa contains almost all the genetic markers found in other parts of the world, but the reverse is not true.



Following more than a century of research in genetics, especially molecular genetics, it is becoming possible to trace the origins of different population groups in the world. It is important however to approach it with care because it has some pitfalls. In particular, since all humans living in the world today have more than 99 per cent of their genes in common, almost any two groups can be found to be genetically similar. Failing to recognise this has led to absurd conclusions like the claim that upper caste Indians are of European origin, who "imposed the oppressive caste system" on the indigenous population. (No 'oppressor gene' has been found.)



The error here lay in assigning biological causes to a man-made classification like caste. Nature, however, does not recognise man-made boundaries. Similar claims can be made for religion— finding a genetic basis for Christianity. Taking this a step further, one may identify Catholic genes, Protestant genes, and presumably even Mormon genes in Salt Lake City, Utah, the home of the Mormon Church, where the claim about genes and caste was first made.



Similarly impossible claims have been made about language, social habits and the like that can have no biological basis. The error consists in mistaking the phenotype for a purely inherited trait or genotype. In addition, some workers have tried to use genetics to justify their own pet beliefs and theories like the Aryan invasion. This has led to absurdities like one group claiming that only males migrated (more of which later) while another claimed only females did! Obviously both cannot be true, but both can be false.



After some initial hiccups, the definitive statement about the genetic composition of the Indian population was summarised as follows by researchers led by Luigi Cavalli-Sforza:

Taken together, these results show that Indian tribal and caste populations derive largely from the same genetic heritage of Pleistocene southern and western Asians and have received limited gene flow from external regions since the Holocene. The phylogeography [neighboring branches] of the primal mtDNA and Y-chromosome founders suggests that these southern Asian Pleistocene coastal settlers from Africa would have provided the inocula for the subsequent differentiation of the distinctive eastern and western Eurasian gene pools." (Italics added.)



Noting that mtDNA is carried by the female line, while Y-chromosome is passed on through the male line, what this means is that the Indian population is largely indigenous in origin and has received negligible external input (gene flow) since the end of the last Ice Age (Holocene). This means that various migration theories like the Aryan invasion in 1500 B.C.E. simply cannot be true.



The Oxford geneticist Stephen Oppenheimer is more specific and also more emphatic, focusing on the M17 or the so-called 'Caucasoid' (politically correct for 'Aryan') genetic marker:

…South Asia is logically the ultimate origin of M17 and his [Sic] ancestors; and sure enough we find highest rates and greatest diversity of the M17 line in Pakistan, India and eastern Iran, and low rates in the Caucasus. M17 is not only more diverse in South Asia than in Central Asia, but diversity characterises its presence in isolated tribal groups in the south, thus undermining any theory of M17 as a marker of a 'male Aryan invasion' of India.



So there was no Aryan invasion— by males or by females. This also means that the tribal or the so-called 'indigenous' populations of India are not any different from the people making up the bulk of the Indian population, which is what Cavalli-Sforza and his colleagues also found. As Oppenheimer observes, genetics is quite specific on this point.



One age estimate for the origin of this line in India is as much as 51,000 years. All this suggests that M17 could have found his [Sic] way initially from India or Pakistan, through Kashmir, then via Central Asia and Russia, before finally coming to Europe. (Ibid)



It is worth noting that this is the exact reverse of the scenario postulated by various invasion/migration theories including the Aryan invasion theory. This is by no means the last word on population distributions, but new findings are unlikely to salvage these 19th century theories or their modern incarnations founded on linguistics, racial ideas and political needs.



Conclusion: from Galileo to Max Planck


Seen against this background of evidence from a wide range of sources—from natural history and genetics to literary and archaeological records—the idea that the Indian civilization developed in a few centuries, seeded by small groups of invading (or migrating) 'Aryans' from the Eurasian steppes cannot be taken seriously. But this is only in hindsight. The fact remains— it was taken seriously, and even today, when one would expect a more enlightened attitude towards facts and evidence than what prevailed in the nineteenth century, various devices are being employed to somehow prevent it from collapse. The recent controversy over the proposed changes in the California school curriculum is only latest episode in this ongoing battle to replace these theories with a new approach based on facts and logic.



This phenomenon of an established order resisting change has a long history. Even in the exact sciences, change rarely takes place without a struggle. The most famous of these is probably Galileo's struggle with the Church leading to his Inquisition. History books present this as a classic case of religious dogma against science, and point to Galileo as the victim of the struggle of knowledge against dogma and superstition. This is a serious distortion of the true nature of the conflict. What Galileo challenged was not the authority of the Church—he was a devout Catholic—but the worldview of his contemporaries. This worldview held that the empirical method and mathematics—both products of the human mind—could not be applied to the study of the heavens, which they held was the creation of God. According to them it was only theology that could explain the heavens— not experiment and observation, much less mathematics.



This is an important point frequently lost in the oversimplification involved in seeing Galileo's persecution as a case of science against religion. His adversaries, who prominently included Cardinal Bellarmine, saw themselves as scientists. It was only when they failed to defeat him in the scientific arena that they resorted to influencing religious and political authority represented by the Vatican, then the paramount power in Italy. More than religion, Galileo's challenge was to theology as the pre-eminent tool in the study of the world. We now see mathematics as the queen of sciences. In Galileo's time, that position was held by theology. According to Galileo, "the universe is written in the language of mathematics." This was something that philosophers (i.e., 'scientists') like Cardinal Bellarmine would never concede. To them, universe was God's creation and only theology could be the legitimate tool.


To a historian of science, there is a remarkable similarity between the attitudes of theologians in Galileo's time and of philologists and anthropologists in our own. They cannot accept the fact that the very foundation of their discipline—not just the Aryan invasion theory—has collapsed. Natural history and genetics have demolished their theories as well as their methods. And like Galileo's adversaries, they too have chosen to resort to politics and propaganda, though the forces they invoke lack the authority of the Church in Galileo's time.



Progress, however, does not respect position and prestige. It is unlikely that the proponents of the Aryan theories will be able to turn the clock back or stem progress. What can we expect? Will they recognize that their positions are doomed and learn new facts and master new methods? Highly unlikely. Max Planck, one of the founders of quantum physics that went on to revolutionize physics once observed:


An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually winning over and converting its opponents: it rarely happens that Saul becomes Paul. What does happen is that its opponents gradually die out and that the growing generation is familiarized with the idea from the beginning.



If history is any guide, it will be no different with the Aryan theories. We are unlikely to convert the existing adherents: they have too must invested in it, and too set in their ways to change. The most we can expect from them is old wine in new bottles— like AIT being served up as the Aryan 'influx' theory instead of the Aryan 'invasion' theory. Time and progress will take care of them.



So there is little point in engaging beyond an occasional rebuttal of their claims. What we should be focusing on is the next generation of researchers and pave the way for their work. We should be devoting our time and energy less to fighting these ghosts from the past and more to building a foundation for the younger generation. We can begin by highlighting the importance of some crucial factors like ecology and climate change that have been all but ignored by historians and anthropologists for over a century. We can also emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary approaches that combine science and literary records.



In summary, returning to the present situation, let us accept this well established scientific fact: outside of Africa, South Asia contains the world's oldest populations, and modern Europeans are themselves among the peoples descended from migrants from India, going back more than 40,000 years. There exist ample materials from diverse sources ranging from natural history and archaeology to literature and astronomical records that testify to this.


Let us study them and learn about the people who created them without resort to labels and stereotypes like 'Aryan' and 'Dravidian.' Our time horizons should also change from centuries to millennia, and even tens of millennia. We need to understand more about the impact of climate change, especially during the transition from the Ice Age to the Holocene. (The Holocene is the present interglacial or warm period in which we are living.) This should be the starting point for studying history in the Holocene or the post Ice Age period.



(Concluded)


(The writer is a former U.S. academic and industrial researcher. His latest book is Sarasvati River and the Vedic Civilization: History, science and politics.)

 

Part 1 of this series by Dr NS Rajaram

http://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2008/12/myth-of-aryan-invasion.html

Part 2 of this series 

 

 http://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2008/12/aryan-invasion-genetically-dis-proved.html