Tuesday, December 23, 2008

பாவை நோன்பு – how it was done?




Paavi nOnbu is an important tradition in the lives of Tamils from times of antiquity.
The memory of it exists till today, thanks to AndaaL who immortalized that memory in her composition, Thiruppavai.


It is a matter of interest and inquisitiveness why this nOnbu was performed.
It is our fortune that olden compositions describing this nOnbu still exist with us.
The most detailed account of this nOnbu and the nOnbu done in the month of தை (known as தை- நீராடல் ) are found in பரிபாடல் !


Of the 70 compositions in Paripaadal,
dedicated to திருமால் , செவ்வேள் (Murugan) and
the river வைகை running in மதுரை ,
only 22 compositions are available with us in complete form.
Parts of another 11 compositions as quoted
by other authors of olden texts are also available.
They help us in knowing the culture and tradition
of Tamils who lived 2000 years ago.


We can say for sure that Paripaadal was composed more than 2000 years ago,
because the 11th composition that speaks about the glory of the river Vaigai
begins with the astro details as existed at that time.
It was the beginning of the Rainy season in that year
and composition details the customs that were followed
for the next 6 months (ending with the month of Thai)
with the river as an essential entity in the customs.


It is in exploring the verses of the 11th composition
with the aid of commentary written by none other than
பரிமேலழகர் (who has written commentary for திருக்குறள் also),
we come across the details of how the பாவை நோன்பு
and the 'தை - நீராடல் ' were performed.


This composition was written by
நல்லந்துவனார் ,
Isai – நாகனார் ,
PaN – பாலை யாழ்


First let us know the time period of this composition
so that we will know how old was this tradition.
The sky map constructed from the details of the first part of this composition
is given below.





From this it is ascertained that the year was 161 BC.
That was Kaliyugapthi 2,941. (The present kali year is 5110)
It was the year of Pramaadhi,
12th day in the solar month of AavaNi,
with moon in Avitta in Chathurdasi.



The rainy season (கார் காலம் ) began on this day as per tradition.

'மாரி இயைக என இவ் ஆற்றால்'

'Iv- aaru' here means as per tradition or destiny
making it appear that a good and bountiful rainy season is pre-determined
due to some reason.
We will discuss that in the next post.


The planetary position shows a bountiful rainy season.
It was because all the causes that facilitate such a season had existed the year before!
That is what paavai nonbu is about – a contributive factor in rainfall.
The details of that will be taken up in the next post
And the present post is an introductory one for that.
Without knowing what Paavai nOnbu is about,
we can not say how it is a contributive factor in rainfall.


மார்கழி arrives after a long spell of bountiful rains.
The river வைகை is full and at many places it looks muddy in color
as the sediments have not yet settled down.
The mornings are cold and waters are ice-cold.
And the fogs have not started.


It is time for doing a vratham or நோன்பு or the austerity
which requires the doer to control the senses.
It is time give up regular wishes such as beautifying oneself with decorative.
On the day of Full moon when moon enters Arudra (thiruvadirai)
the nOnbu begins.
(this tallies with the time as 'மதி நிறைந்த நன்னாள் '
as indicated in the 1st verse of Thiruppavai)


Parimelazhagar says that Maargazhi is known as "குளம் "

"ஞாயிறு காயா நளி மாரிப் பின் குளத்து,"
because the moon is Arudra and the sun is in Poorvashada (pooradam).
Arudra stands for rainfall.

The day of entry of the sun in Arudra determines the rainfall
for the whole year according to Varsha-phalan.
The moon is without "களங்கம் " – getting full in brightness.
It is aspected by the sun which has now taken position in the star Poorada
that ensures water.


The month when this happens is like a 'குளம் '-
as all tanks and water bodies are full by the time Margazhi arrives.
It is known as 'குளம் ' for another reason also.
The water is not fast but it gently moves along the breeze.
It is also not deep but sufficient enough to take a dip.
It is safe for the young girls to play as they take bath.
That is also why this month came to be called as குளம்


In this month, on the day of Full moon,
Vediks begin 'விழவு ' –thiruvizha (festival)

This is described like this in பரிபாடல் .

ஞாயிறு காயா நளி மாரிப் பின் குளத்து,
மா இருந் திங்கள் மறு நிறை ஆதிரை
விரிநூல்
அந்தணர் விழவு தொடங்க,
புரி நூல் அந்தணர் பொலம் கலம் ஏற்ப,
'வெம்பாதாக, வியல் நில வரைப்பு!' என 80

அம்பா ஆடலின் ஆய் தொடிக் கன்னியர்,
முனித் துறை முதல்வியர் முறைமை காட்ட, பனிப் புலர்பு ஆடி, பரு மணல் அருவியின் ஊதை ஊர்தர,
உறை சிறை வேதியர்
நெறி நிமிர்
நுடங்கு அழல் பேணிய சிறப்பின், 85
தையல் மகளிர் ஈர் அணி புலர்த்தர,
வையை! நினக்கு மடை வாய்த்தன்று.

மையாடல் ஆடல் மழ புலவர் மாறு எழுந்து,

பொய் ஆடல் ஆடும் புணர்ப்பின் அவர்,
அவர்
தீ எரிப் பாலும் செறி தவம் முன் பற்றியோ, 90
தாய் அருகா நின்று தவத் தைந் நீராடுதல்?

நீ உரைத்தி, வையை நதி
!



On the day of Full moon in Maargazhi,
young unmarried girls accompanied by their mothers go to the Vaigai.
'அம்பா ஆடலின் ஆய் தொடிக் கன்னியர'
(அம்பா - mother )


They go with the prayer that the land be cool as how they experience then,
with the sun not scorching them as it used to do in other times.
That is, the prayer is for a cool and damp weather
that can happen only if the preceding rainy season was satisfactory
So the prayer is indirectly for good rains
and also for a mighty sun that shines well but not scorch the land!


The girls are accompanied by முனித் துறை முதல்வியர் -
the elderly Brahmin women who guide them on how to do that nOnbu.
Accordingly, the girls take bath in the cold waters of the river
which is brushed by a gentle breeze.


The girls the join their mothers and follow the instructions to do the prayer.
Then they circumambulate the Homa- agni
(ஹோம குண்டம that were constructed on the banks by the Vediks )
with the wet cloths on
Paripaadal says that they have their wet cloths getting dried up
in the heat of the Homa-agni.
The Vaigai absorbs the vapor from the drying cloths and
also the homa smoke.
That is the ஹவிஸ் for the river.

This is how the Paavai nOnbu is done in Maargazhi,
on the first day of Full moon.


Paripaadal does not say about making the 'paavai'.
But other texts do tell about that.
From other texts we come to know that young unmarried girls
go to the river banks on other days too.

The elders do not accompany them.
The girls go to the river bank accompanied by their friends.
There they make the 'பாவை ' – the image of a girl on the sand
and offer flowers to it.
After this they enter the river water, splash and play in the water.
It looks as though the water is playing with them.

From Pura nanuru - 243:-

(திணிமணல் செய்வுறு பாவைக்கு கொய்பூத் தைஇத்,
தண்கயம் ஆடும் மகளிரொடு கைபிணைந்து,

தழுவுவழித் தழீஇத், தூங்குவழித் தூங்கி,
மறைஎனல் அறியா மாயமில் ஆயமொடு
உயர்சினை)


The water play is an important feature as it is told in other verses too.

From Purananuru -11:-


அரி மயிர்த் திரள் முன்கை
வால் இழை, மட மங்கையர்
வரி மணற் புனை பாவைக்குக்
குலவுச் சினைப் பூக் கொய்து


The paavai they make is sometimes destroyed by
the flowing water of Vaigai- making the girls cry.


From Paripaadal 7:-

'மாதர் மடநல்லார், மணலின் எழுதிய 25

பாவை சிதைத்தது' என அழ, '


But making the paavai and bathing in the river were important scenes seen in Maargazhi.

This is told in a sutra 1369, in Pingala nigandu

"pani neer thOidalum, paavai aadalum" .



The pleasant screams and cries of the young girls
as they shake in the cold waters of the river
is a routine scene in pre-dawn of Maargazhi in those days.
The girls are left to play in the river because the water level is that of a 'kuLam'
This is known from the commentary on Thai neeradal!


The conditions have changed as Thai ushers in.
The water in Thai is crystal clear.
The river is calm and it is time for 'தவத்தை ஆடல் ' –
It is a tapas, a thavam or a time of prayer.
தவத்தை நீராடல் (bathing as a tapas) is done as a continuation of
மார்கழி பனி -நீராடல் . (bathing in cold water)



Paripaadal describes like this.
The girls make merry in the waters in the month of Thai with "பொய்யாடல்".
The dance is பொய்யாடல் " – not a true reflection of what it seems to convey.

பரிமேலழகர் describes that the dances or / and the moves
that the girls make while dancing
have no shred of 'காமம் ' exhibited in them.
The moves done by the girls are very innocent,
for which one can not attribute any idea of love or sexual desire in them.
Probably the dances were on love themes
but the moves by the girls seemed to suggest that they are not love-struck.
That is why the dance was called "பொய்யாடல் "


After the dances on the banks and in the waters as they take bath,
the girls join their mothers and follow the instruction in prayers.
The ஹோம – அக்னி is made on the banks by the Vediks and
The girls and married women circumambulate it
and pray to Vaigai!


An amazing part of this prayer is that it is addressed to the river Vaigai
with a plea to the river to tell her (the girl)
what good she has done to do that நோன்பு there.

Is it because it was done by her in her earlier births too?
(Does the river remember her as one who prayed in an earlier birth?)
The Nonbu that begins with a prayer to have the world cool at all times
ends in Thai with a prayer for a happy married life.



The water in Thai is clear,
therefore it is the right one to absorb the wishes exactly.

From Paripaadal 11 :-

'நீ தக்காய், தைந் நீர்! நிறம் தெளிந்தாய்' என்மாரும், 115

The married woman prays that her husband's love for her never diminishes.
She prays that he never leaves her.
Some married women pray that they as a couple would remain youthful for long,
even after the wife attains the last and the 7th stage of womanhood (of பேரிளம் பெண் ) (1)
They also pray for prosperity in the company of relatives.



From Paripaadal 11:-


' "கழுத்து அமை கை வாங்காக் காதலர்ப் புல்ல,
விழுத் தகை பெறுக!" என வேண்டுதும்' என்மாரும்,
'பூ வீழ் அரியின் புலம்பப் போகாது,
யாம் வீழ்வார், ஏமம் எய்துக!' என்மாரும்,
' "கிழவர் கிழவியர்" என்னாது, ஏழ்காறும், 120

மழ ஈன்று மல்லற் கேள் மன்னுக!" என்மாரும்_____



After the prayer, they play music in the பாலை யாழ் set to 'பரி பாடல் '.
There is no mention of prayer by unmarried girls here.
The girls who pray there are attractive and young
They are already married and pray for a happy life with their spouse.
They sing that they had prayed to the Vaigai like that in the previous birth.
They are praying now.
Let Vaigai make them come to her (the river) and pray again in a future birth too.


முன் முறை செய் தவத்தின் இம் முறை இயைந்தேம்;
மறு முறை அமையத்தும் இயைக!
நறு நீர் வையை நயத் தகு நிறையே! 140
Thus ends the Thai neeradal.



Some observations are :-
(1) In maargazhi, both married and unmarried women perform the nOnbu.

(2) The unmarried girls make the paavai as a girl's play and worship that.
That is perhaps to get her used to a habit of praying for happy married life
once she gets married.
So the girl who accompanies her mother right from young days
and does on her part the playful prayer to the paavai,
continues to come after her marriage with a serious and heart-felt prayer
for a happy life with the husband.


(3) The prayer in Maargazhi is obviously for Nature
that is cool and shining simultaneously.
The prayer in Thai is a prayer for oneself.
Marriage takes importance in that.


(4) The prayer by married woman was perhaps an inspiration for girls
who are waiting to be married –
that they would pray for marrying a suitable groom.
Andaal's prayer was such that.


*************


சிலப்பதிகாரம் also reports a நோன்பு of the தை நீராடல் kind.
A Brahmin girl by name தேவந்தி tells கண்ணகி
that the root cause of her suffering of separation from கோவலன்
(who went after மாதவி )
was perhaps due to not doing a nOnbu in her previous birth,
that was meant for a happy married life.


It is possible to assume that Devandhi meant the Maargazhi and Thai nOnbu.
Because the nOnbu she mentioned was also about
bathing in the river and praying for happy married life.
Only the scene was different.

Bathing must be done in சங்கம் of river காவேரி (where it joins the sea)
and also includes a dip in the scared waters of
சூர்ய குண்டம் and சோம குண்டம் (Chandra kund).
The prayer is directed to the Lord of Love, மன்மதன் .
The prayer is for a happy married life
and also for a rebirth in 'Bhoga bhoomi' in her next birth
to lead a happy life with husband.



From
Pukaar khandam

'9. கனாத்திறம் உரைத்த காதை கணவற்கு ஒருநோன்பு 55
பொய்த்தாய் பழம்பிறப்பில் போய்க்கெடுக உய்த்துக்
கடலொடு காவிரி சென்றுஅலைக்கும் முன்றில்
மடல்அவிழ் நெய்தல்அம் கானல் தடம்உள
சோமகுண்டம் சூரிய குண்டம் துறைமூழ்கிக்
காமவேள் கோட்டம் தொழுதார் கணவரொடு 60
தாம்இன் புறுவர்
உலகத்துத் தையலார்
போகம்செய் பூமியினும் போய்ப்பிறப்பர் யாம்ஒருநாள்
ஆடுதும் என்ற அணிஇழைக்குஅவ் ஆய்இழையாள்'


The customs around the nOnbu was like this (as reported in Silappadhikaram)
after a few centuries of Paripaadal times.
(Kanangi's time was sometime in 2nd century AD)


After a 1000 years, it became a blend of
Maargazhi paavai nOnbu and
the tradition that existed in Silappadhikaram times.
The paavai nOnbu was followed by prayer to Manmatha –
instead of the prayer to the river
That is what we know from Thiruppavai.


Another 1000 years later – that is in the present times -
we have to be just content with the thought
that we at least know that such a tradition existed for very long in this land.


Even if some one wishes to do the paaavi nOnbu,
where is the flowing Vaigai?

Where are the rivers?

Where are the seasonal rains?

What have we to pray?


With matrimonial discord rising among the population,
with Nature not being seasonal and helpful,
do we know what we want?



(to be continued)




Notes:-


(1) The 7 stages in the life of a woman are
பேதை , பெதும்பை , மங்கை , மடந்தை ,
அரிவை, தெரிவை and பேரிளம் பெண்



Related article:-

யார் நப்பின்னை ?

Monday, December 22, 2008

The kings mentioned by Periaazhwar!




There are some historical information given by Periaazhwar (Andal's father ) in his verses. He has mentioned about some Pandyan kings at 3 places. This post attempts to find out who they were and whether such information contain clues to his and therefore Andal's period. In the previous post we found that Andal composed Thiruppavai some in the 800s, in the 9th century AD.



Periaazhwar makes a mention of kings at 3 places.

(1) parupapdatthu kayal porittha pandiyar kula pathy. (Periahwar thirumoazhi 5-4-7)

(2) Konnavil sudar vEl kOn nedumaran (Periahwar thirumoazhi 4-2-7 )

(3) Kurugatha mannarai koodu kalakki ( Periahwar thirumoazhi 4-2-8)


It is obvious from these that the aazhwar had lived in the kingdom of Pandyans.

There is mention of a Pandyan king who affixed his emblem on the Himalayas.

There is mention of one 'Kon Nerdumaran'.

And there is mention of a king who defeated many kings in war.



Added to this is an information from Guru parampara texts of those days on Azhwars which state that a king by name Sreemaran Sree vallabhan was the ruler in Periaazwar's times. The king had paid respects to the aazwar as he provided the answer for the king's query and removed his doubts. The king had treated him with reverence by taking him in a procession on his Royal elephant. It was then the aazhwar had the vision of Lord Narayana on his Garuda vahana seeing which, Periaazhwar sang the "Pallandu verses".



The time period of this king can be traced from the inscriptions found about 40 years ago in a Vishnu temple at Sinnamanur in Peria kulam taluk of Madurai district.

Let us look at them.



Time period from Inscriptions.



So far 4 sets of inscriptions pertaining to Pandyan dynasty have been unearthed and deciphered. Two from Sinnamanur and one from Velvikudi and another from Anaimalai.



The large copper plates of Sinnamanur bear the lineage of Pandyans starting from 'Kadum kOn' and ending with 'Rajasimha III'. It has been ascertained by scholars and historians that Rajasimha III at whose order the inscriptions have been made was a contemporary of Cholan King Paranthaka I, who ruled in the early part of 10th century AD.



The fact that of interest to us is that Raja simha III was the grand son of Sri Maran Si Vallabhan whom the Guru parampara had identified as the king during Periaazhwar's time.

The inscription is written in Sanskrit and in Tamil.



The genealogy of the Pandyans from Kadum kOn is traced in both versions.

In the Sanskrit version, the name Sri Maran Si Vallabhan is found , whereas in the corresponding Tamil version, his name is mentioned as "Parachakra Kolahalan".

This name gives a lot of information.



The complete information on the inscriptions can be read here

http://www.whatisindia.com/inscriptions/south_indian_inscriptions/volume_3/copper_plates_at_tirukkalar.html


The Sanskrit version on Sri vallabha is given here. (note that Rajasimhan is a recuuerent name. Sri Vallabha's father was Rajasimham II. His grand son was Rajasimhan III)



In this family was born king Arikesarin. His son was Jatila ; his son Rajasimha (II) ; his son Varaguna (I) ; and his son Sri-Mara entitled Srivallabha (v. 10). Sri-Mara conquered Maya-Pandya, the kings of Kerala and Simhala, the Pallava and the Vallabha (v. 11). His son was Parantaka the younger brother of Varaguna II (v. 12), who fought a battle at Kharagiri and captured Ugra (v. 13). His wife was Vanavanmahadevi (v. 15) and their son was Rajasimha (III), the banner (both) of the solar and the lunar races (vv. 16 and 17).


The corresponding Tamil version in the words of the epigrapher is given here.


Rajasimha's son was Parachakrakolahala who was cuccesful in battles fought at Kunnur, Singalam (Ceylon) and Vilinam and who at Kudamukkil won a deadly battle against the combined armies of the Ganga, Pallava, Chola, Kalinga, Magadha and other kings. Next came Varagunavarman, whose relationship to Parachakrakolahala is also not specified. His younger brother was Parantakan Sadaiyan, who fought battles at Sennilam, Kharagiri and Pennagadam in the Kongu country. To him and his queen Vanavanmahadevi was born Rajasimha surnamed Vikatavadava and Mandaragaurava.



Maran is a titular name of Pandyans. We don not know the original name of many kings. However the name is given here is Sri maran who came to be called as Sri Vallabhan because he conquered the Vallabhs.


This king had defeated many kings and this tallies with Periazhwar's narration,

"Kurugaatha mannarai-k-koodu kalakki…"


That he is the king in Periaazhwar's time is known from Seevara mangalam copper plates where it is mentioned that his successor, Paranthakan became a 'parama vaishnavan'.

The first deviation from tradition happened in Paranthakan's time in that he married Vanavanmadevi of Chola race and it is mentioned in the inscription that their son Rajasimha III who made these inscriptions was the product of solar and lunar race!



The Cholans were the descendants of Sibi, who shared the lineage with Rama as known from Thiruvalangadu copper plates. (Analysis and details of the lineage can be read in this bolg) . Till Mandhatha the cholans had the same lineage. Sibi came in the lineage of siblings after Mandhatha and they all spanned out and further descendants established their kingdoms in many parts. One such person was Chola varman who established Chola dynasty in the South as per the inscriptions. In Raghu kulam only the eldest son ascended the throne. Bharatha also says this in his argument to make Raman accept the throne after his return from exile.



The Cholans were known as Sembians, tracing their lineage to Sibi.

They were from Solar race whose god was Vishnu.

Whereas the Pandyans belonged to the Lunar race and worshiped Siva as they sprang from Gowri or Meenaskhi who married Siva.

The two distinct races with distinct worship methods merged in Parantakan's time.



The causes can be traced to his father Parachakra kolahalan. (Sree maran Sri vallabhan)

This name itself reveals that he had the divya darshan of the 'Para-vasthu' along with the Chakra-p-padai as He appeared for Periaazhwar.

This darshan must have changed the king who was until then a shiva devotee as per his family tradition.

The influence of Periaazhwar and the darshan he had along with para-tattwa must have made his son (Paranthaka, the younger one. The elder Varaguna did not ascend the throne. No mention of the reason is found in the inscription) Paranthaka a parama vaishnavan to such an extent that he broke the tradition and married a princes from Vishnu worshiping family of Cholas.



The temple at Srivilliputtur might have been built by these kings, at the instance of Periaazhwar. But such a mention is absent in the inscriptions, In this case we have to search for inscriptions in the temple walls etc. If such an information is available, it will do good to bring it to the notice of authorities.



If Raja simhan III, the grand son of Srivallabha has lived in the early part of 10th century AD, we can deduce that Srivallabha had lived within a century earlier. This tallies with astronomical dating based on precession of equinoxes and the location of Jupiter and Venus as told by Andal.




The Kings in Periaazhwar's works.



Periaazhwar makes a mention of kings at 3 places.

(4) parupapdatthu kayal porittha pandiyar kula pathy. (Periahwar thirumoazhi 5-4-7)

(5) Konnavil sudar vEl kOn nedumaran (Periahwar thirumoazhi 4-2-7 )

(6) Kurugatha mannarai koodu kalakki ( Periahwar thirumoazhi 4-2-8)



Let us see one by one.



"parupapdatthu kayal porittha pandiyar kula pathy". (Periahwar thirumoazhi 5-4-7)

A pandyan king had engraved their edicts on the Himalyan mountain.

This is also mentioned in the sinnamanur copper plates as the 2nd verse.



In the words of the epigrapher,


"The Sanskrit portion of the bigger Sinnamanur plates begins with a fragmentary verse in which the king (perhaps Pandya) boasts of having subdued the ocean — an attribute which the mythical Pandya kings generally assumed in consequence, perhaps, of their sea-bordering kingdom, their naval power, and their sea-borne trade, from the earliest historical times. From him were descended the kings known as Pandyas (v. 2) 'who engraved their edicts on the Himalaya mountain' and whose family-priest was the sage Agastya (v. 3)."



This has also been recorded in Silappadhikaram (1) in the opening verse of Aacchiar kuravai, and in verses 104 and 105 of Kali-th-thogai. This king is described as one who survived the last deluge, pushed to the present day Madurai after dislodging the Cholans and Cherans and went as far away to the Himalayas as to place his symbol on the Himalayan mountain.


But these texts have not spelt his name. Only this feat is repeatedly recorded.

The Sinnamanur plates begin with a king, Kadum kOn.


Though we can not say if it was the king who survived the deluge, since the lineage listed is not long enough to be spread over thousands of years since the last deluge, there is scope to say that he belonged to the direct lineage of the one who survived the deluge and bore the title of that king by tradition.



The king who survived the deluge was aided by Agasthya (as per the inscription) .
From Nacchinaarkiniyar's commentary, we know that Agasthya came to Tamil lands (at Podhigai near Madurai) after the deluge in Dwaraka with 3 sets of people from Royal, feudal and worker class of Dwaraka and settled them in the re-structured lands near Podhigai. This was the time of deluge off Kanya kumari, that brought the surviving Pandyans and his subjects to the same lands. Agasthya (or his descendant with the same family name) who was already connected with the Pandyans of Then Madurai, had come to be associated with this king too at the time of deluge that was the nature of Yuga-pralaya at the end of Dwapara yuga.



From Periaazhwar we can deduce that the name of that king was 'Kadum KOn Nedumaran'

Periaazhwar has not meant Srimaran Srivallbhan by "kayal porittha pandiyar kula pathy".

The reasons are that Srivallabhan did to go to the Himalayas but only conquered kings in his vicinity. From the inscription also we know that the one who went to Himalayas was different from him.

There is every possibility to infer that this king was mentioned in vesre 4-2-7 as "kadum kOn Nedumaran"


Pariazhwar describes him with a "koodal vEl". The vEl was the divine instrument procured from Shiva with which Ugra Pandyan, the very king in the lineage of Gowri managed to stop the surging oceans in the now submerged Then-Madurai (Koodal ma nagar) which was more than 1000 miles south of the present day Kanyakumari. There are not less than 7 literary sources to authenticate this which I am not producing here (but can be read in my blog posts) for the purpose of making this post simple and easy to follow.


It is possible to assume that this weapon capable of fighting (in) waters was treasured through generations and used by the last king of that era when another deluge happened. This king who managed to survive that deluge with that weapon had conquered the lands upto Himalayas.


Since Periazhwar remembers this king at another verse too (paruppadatthu-k- kayal porittha pandiyar kula pathy), it is possible to assume that he was Kadum kOn Nedumaran. The title 'Kadum' speaks about his fierce temperament with which he overcame the fury of nature and turned his fury on others to grab a place for himself in the now occupied areas.


Another reason that the Kadum Kon was not Sri vallabhan is that it is a practice to remember the first of the lineage before praising the ruling king of the contemporary times. We can prove this in many verses of sangam texts. Among prabahndam pasurams, we can see Thirumangai aazhwar using this tradition he remembers Sibi (sembian) the first king of Choals before praising Kocehnganaan in his verses on Thiru naraiyur.


So we have now solved 2 of the references by Periaazhwar.
The third is of course about Sri vallabhan in 4-2-8


There is corroboratory evidence fro this in Sinhalese Maha vamsam.


The reference to 'Indra kobhangal' in the next verse also is a continuation of how the Pandyan kings suffered Indra's curse in having opposed his army of storms and rains right from the time of Ugra pandyan. Silappadhikaram records this in the words of a Brahmin who says since the Pandyans had outwitted Indra and stopped the mighty ocean, they incurred the wrath of Indra and as if to take revenge for this, Indra caused another deluge which made the Pandyans homeless.


The king who survived had established the present day Madurai (and 3rd sangam) and Thirumalirum cholai. His lineage with the preceding 10 + generations of Rajasimha III had been mentioned by Rajasimha III in the copper plates. The list starts with Kadum KoN, identified as Kadum Kon Nedumaran who was the first one in the new order established after the deluge.



Fine tuning the sky map of Thiruppavai.


Thus, the inscriptions and literary source (from Periazhwar) locate the aazhwar's (therefore Andal's ) time at 9th century AD which goes well astronomical factors.


Accurate date of Maargazhi when Thiruppavai was composed can be made by incorporating the following information.


The sky map was such that the sun was in the cusp of Sagittarius.

Moon was in the cusp of Taurus- Gemini.

Venus was in Scorpio closer to the junction with Sagittarius.

Jupiter was 180 degrees opposite to Venus in Mrigashira 2nd pada.



This gives the next clue on the year too.


As per Brihaspatya mana (Guru mana), Jupiter's year which consists of 5 rounds around the zodiac with a year in each sign begins in Kaarthikaptha in Taurus in the year Vijaya!


Jupiter was in Taurus in the sky map of Thiruppavai.


So it must have been any of the five years, Vijaya, Vishvavasu, Pinagala, Shukla or Vishu


*****************************

Notes:-


(1) From Silapapdhikaram



17. ஆய்ச்சியர் குரவை
கயலெழுதிய இமயநெற்றியின்
அயலெழுதிய புலியும்வில்லும்
நாவலந்தண் பொழின்மன்னர்


****************************


11. காடுகாண் காதை

ஊழிதொ றூழிதொ றுலகங் காக்க
அடியிற் றன்னள வரசர்க் குணர்த்தி
வடிவேல் எறிந்த வான்பகை பொறாது
ப·றுளி யாற்றுடன் பன்மலை யடுக்கத்துக்
குமரிக் கோடுங் கொடுங்கடல் கொள்ள 20
வடதிசைக் கங்கையும் இமயமுங் கொண்டு
தென்றிசை யாண்ட தென்னவன் வாழி


***********


Related post from this blog:-

Dating of Thirruppavai from paasurams 1, 3 & 4


***************

Up-dated on 23-07-2010

From


http://tamilartsacademy.com/articles/article08.xml


Date of Periyalvar


Among the Vaishnavite Alvars, Periyalvar refers in his verse to Pandyan Ko-Nedumaran.

That Periyalvar was a contemporary of Nedumaran is thus established. Prof. K. A. Nilakanta Sastri says that "all that we can infer is that if this Nedumaran is the same as the contemporary of Jnanasambandar, this Alvar may also be assigned to their age and likewise his daughter Andal. It seems more likely that the reference is to Srimara Srivallabha". Srimara Srivallabha is assigned to Circa 815-862. This probably influenced the learned Professor to prefer the later date.


T. A. Gopinatha Rao in his 'History of the Sri Vaishnavas,' has suggested that Periyalvar was a contemporary of Srimara Srivallalbha, identical with Srivallabha Avanipasekhara of Sittannavasal inscription. Mr. Rao's conclusion is based on the identity of the name Srivallabha, said to be a contemporary of Periyalvar according to Guruparampara.


M. Raghava Iyengar in his 'Age of the Alvars' differed from Gopinatha Rao and held that the contemporary of Periyalvar was Maravarman Rajasimha father of Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan. Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan was a Parama Vaishnava, who erected a Vishnu temple at Kanchivay Perur. Raghava Iyengar held that Parantaka derived his Vishnu-bhakti from his father Maravarman Rajasimha and that Rajasimha should have been converted to Vaishnavism by Periyalvar.


While discussing the date of Periyalvar two points deserve to be carefully noted. (1) The saint himself refers to a Pandya Ko-Nedumaran as his contemporary. (2) The Guruparampara refers to a Pandya Sri vallabha as his contemporary. We must look for a Pandya who had both these titles. Sri Mara, the son of Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan is called in the larger Sinnamanur and Dalavaypuram copper plates as Srivallabha. Srivallabha seems to have been his abishekanama, but whether he had the title Ko-Nedumara was not proved so far by any epigraph.


An epigraph coming from Erukkangudi, Sattur taluk. Ramnad District, published recently throws valuable light on the problem. It refers to Pandya Srivallabha, who conquered the places from Kunnur to Ceylon. The point of interest in this epigraph is that this Srivallabha is also called Ko-Nedumaran.


According to Sinnamanur and Dalavaypuram plates, Srimara Srivallabha, the son of Parantaka Varaguna I, won significant victories at Kunnur, Vilinjam, Kumbakonam and Ceylon. The Erukkangudi, inscription is evidently that of Srimara Srivallabha the son of Parantaka Varaguna, and that he had also the title Ko-Nedumaran.


There can hardly be any doubt that Periyalvar was a contemporary of this Ko-Nedumaran Srivallabha and should have flourished in the 9th century CE. On the other hand no epigraph has so far been found which gives either the title Srivallabha or Ko-Nedumaran to Rajasimha, whom Raghava Iyengar holds as the contemporary of Periyalvar. We therefore agree with T. A. Gopinatha Rao and K. A. N. Sastri, that the contemporary of Periyalvar was Srimara Srivallabha and that the Vaishnavite Saint flourished in the 9th century CE. Andal, the daughter of Periyalvar should also be assigned to the same period.


Date of Thirumangai


Scholars have discussed the problem of the date of Thirumangai Alvar in detail and have arrived at a satisfactory date. The date of this Alvar can be fixed with certain amount of accuracy as he refers to his contemporary Pallava ruler Nandi. Thirumangai lists his conquests which are corroborated by copper plates.


Thirumangai sings the battle of "Mannai" where Pallavamalla is said to have defeated the Pandya. This is also corroborated by another copper plate. In the Udayendram plates, Nandivarman's general, Udaya Chandra is praised for his victory over the Pandyasena at Mannaikkudigramma. (Mannaik-kudi grame Pandya-senam jitavan.) Udayendram plate was issued in the 21st regnal year of Nandivarman (752). The Pandya ruler who opposed Nandi was Maravarman Rajasimha.


Thirumangai also refers to the battle of Karuvur in which the Pallava is said to have won.


A new evidence has come to light regarding the battle of Karuvur which has not yet received due attention. The Dalavaypuram plates mention that Parantaka Varaguna, defeated the Pallava at Karuvur. This gets indirect confirmation from another source. Sivaramangalam plates refers to Parantaka's fight with Atiya, at Pugaliyur and Ayirur on the northern bank of the river Kaveri. These places are situated near Karur. The same charter also states, that Varaguna defeated the Pallava and Keralan, who came to help the Atiya. Evidently the battle of Pugaliyur was followed upto Karuvur where an indescive battle was fought. Both the Pallava and the Pandya claim victory at Karuvur. Whatever the result of the war may be, one thing is certain, that Thirumangai who sings this battle, was a contemporary of Nandivarman Pallavamalla and Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan.


Thus Thirumangai was a contemporary of two Pandya rulers Rajasimha I and Nedunjadaiyan. On the Pallava side, he was a contemporary of Nandivarman Pallavamalla.(731-796)


It must be mentioned that this Vaishnava Alvar, sings in one of his verse, Vairamegha who is generally identified with Dantivarma Pallava, who ruled in the first half of 9th century A.D. Thirumangai is therefore taken to be a contemporary of Dantis as well. But we have shown elsewhere that the title Vairamegha was a title of Nandivarman himself. As such we may assign Thirumangai to the reign of Nandivarman. Thus Thirumangai's date may be taken as 730-800CE.



Date of Nammalvar


Almost, the same period must be assigned to Nammalvar. Nammalvar sings Varagunamangai, and Srivaramangalam, both places established by Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan. Madhurakavi is said to be a desciple of Nammalvar. A Madhurakavi occurs as a minister of Pandya Parantaka I during the early years of his reign, as seen from the Anamalai epigraph. Madhura Kavi was dead at the time of Anamalai inscription. As such Nammalvar's end could be placed about 780 A.D. His date of birth would be circa 745 CE. Nammalvar had two other names which are significant. He was called Parankusa and Maran. In all probability the names Parankusa and Maran were derived after Arikesari Parankusa Maravarman of the Vaigai bed-epigraph. Vaishnavite tradition makes Thirumangai and Nammalvar contemporaries. Our studies also seem to point to the same direction. While the Guruparampara, makes Periyalvar, also a contemporary of Thirumangai and Nammalvar, our studies show that Periyalvar lived in the 9th century CE.


The Vaigai bed inscription of Cendan Maran has opened up new avenues of enquiry relating to the chronology of the early Pandyas and the history of Saivism and Vaishnavism in South India.


As a result of the above study the following are our conclusions:-


1) The Vaigai bed inscription is that of Cendan Maran who ruled atleast for 50 years (650-700 A.D.)


2) He was the hero of the Tamil work Pandikkovai.


3) The chronology of the early Pandyas could be placed at the beginning of about 560 A.D.


4) The city of Mangalapura established by Arikesari was located in the Pandya country.


5) But the Mangalapura where his son defeated the Maharatas is identical with Mangalore.


6) Appar was a contemporary of Mahendra, Mamalla and the Pandya Arikesari.


7) Appar's date would be circa 580-660 A.D.


8) Jnanasambandar was a contemporary of Mamalla I, and Pandya Arikesari Nedumaran.


9) Sambandar's date would be circa 640-656 A.D.


10) Thirumangai was a contemporary of Rajasimha and Nedunjadaiyan of the Pandyas and Nandivarman Pallavamalla and may be assigned between 700 and 800.


11) Nammalvar's date would be about 745 to 780 A.D.


12) Periyalvar was a contemporary of Sri Mara Srivallabha and his date would be Circa 800-885.


13) Andal is to be assigned to the second half of 9th century.


14) The Vaigai bed inscription is an important landmark in the history of Tamilnadu.






Friday, December 19, 2008

Dating of Thirruppavai from paasurams 1, 3 & 4


-->



Vedas contain knowledge of everything under the Sun and Beyond.
Similarly, Thiruppavai which is hailed as "Vedamanaitthukkum Vitthu"
contains many concepts of worldly wisdom
in addition to wisdom of the spiritual kind.




Some such concepts as enshrined in Thiruppavai
help us to locate the time period when it was composed.

The well-known information on the period of Thiruppavai is
contained in the verse 13 (VeLLi yezhundu Vyaazham urangittru)
indicating a celestial happening of simultaneous
rising and setting of Venus and Jupiter respectively
in the pre-dawn time of that day she composed that verse.


Based on this information,
Dr M.RajamAnikkanAr had identified 4 time periods,
600 AD, 731 AD, 885 AD and 886 AD.
He arrived at the probable time as 885 AD or 886 AD,
based on the near opposition of Venus and Jupiter
at pre dawn in the month of mArgazhi in those two years.


But his analysis was done at a time when computer software was not developed.
It will be a useful exercise if some one with the present day know-how
explore the time of this celestial happening.
There are other information too, with which
we can roughly arrive at the time of Thiruppavai.
They are discussed below and can be incorporated
if someone woks on a software on the sky map of those years.


Of importance are two information,
one, on the thithis and
the other in the probable days of GarbOttam as indicated in the paasurams.


The thithi factor.


Thiruppavai opens with the description of the Full moon
in the pre-dawn sky of the first day.
The day was a 'Mathi nirainda nannAL'

It must have been the day of Pournami continuing even after sun-rise.
In the month of Maargashira,
pournami occurs when moon is in the star, Mrigashirsha..
If the moon is in Mrigashirsha on Maargazhi pournami,
then the sun must have been in Pooradam (pooravashada).
This is crucial information.


Because today Margazhi begins when the sun enters Moola star.
Whereas the sun had entered Poorada in Andal's time,
on the first day of Maargazhi.
This is ahead of to-day's location by 13 degrees and 20 minutes!
(that is the duration of a star – the distance between moolam and pooradam )

The reason for this discrepancy is that
the precession of the equinox is taking place continuously at the rate of 1 degree
for every 72 years ( 50.24 seconds / year).
This information helps us in calculating the year
in which Andal had composed Thiruppavai.
Today the precession is at 6 degrees, 40 minutes and 24 seconds
in the constellation of Pisces.
At the rate of 72 years for a degree,
we can calculate how many years had preceded for 13-20 degrees.
This comes to 960 years.
That is, the occurrence of Full moon on the first day of Maargazhi
could have happened 960 years ago.
But the Full moon does not happen in the exact degree of Jyeshta.
If we give allowance for 1 pada duration (3-20 degrees),
that is, Full moon happening anywhere in the 4th pada of Jyeshta,
we arrive at a figure 1200 years from now.


That means Andal had lived anywhere between 808 AD to 1048 AD.
Here we have to apply the Vunus – Jupiter rise and fall on a Krishna paksha dwaadasi ('Pullin vaai' pasuram coming on dwadasi if the first day is assumed to be pournami).


Going by this, we can say that the vernal equinox was
in Ashwini 2 nd pada in Andal's time.
Today it is in Utthrattaadi (uttara bhadrapada) 1 st pada.



GarbOttam.


Let us see the other information that Andal is giving us.
GarbOttam means conception of rains or pregnancy of clouds.
This is a topic by itself in ancient Samhita works.
Brihat samhita contains information on this.
In Brihat samhita, Varahamihira has given detailed accounts of this
as an ancient wisdom given by sages such as
Vasishta, Parashara, Kashyapa and Garga.
Varahamihira has reproduced the information from the works of these sages
which are lost now.


GarbOttam can be understood as "El nino" in today's language.
The movement of the sun in the star Pooradam in the month of Maargazhi
are the GarbOttam days or the days
that determine the rainfall for the rest of the year.

Interestingly, the El nino also is observed during this period only.
GarbOttam contains many information which are unknown to El nino scientists.
This year, GarbOttam or Conception days of rainfall
starts on 28th December and ends on 10th January.
It had happened in the very first 13 days of the month
in which Thiruppavai was composed.
Because the sun had traversed Pooradam
either from the first day of Marrgazhi or a couple of days before that.

The main reason for this benefit is that Pooradam
is lorded by Varuna bhagavan and
Sun's movement in that star reveals the nature of rain later.
That is perhaps the reason why paavai nonbu is also said to bring rainfall.


The Paavai nonbu as was done in Tami lands
had a history as far back as 5000 years ago.
This is known from Sangam texts.
Young girls had performed this nonbu which concluded
with a worship of Manmathan in the month of Thai.
The Prayer was to get a good husband (like Krishna / Thirumaal ).
Married woman had done a similar kind of nonbu
with a concluding prayer to Manmatha for a long a life for husband.
This is known from Silappadhikaram.

Even men folk had conducted some austerities in the month of Maargazhi
and concluded with a prayer to Thirumaal for fulfillment of their
wishes for fame, prosperity, success, long life and
release from karma-vinai for this and next birth.


This is indicated by Andal in Ankan maa Gyaalam paasuram
wherein she has stated how the kings waited
for His darshan after dip in the sangam.

The line 'sangam iruppar pOl vandhu thalai-p-peithOm'
is the same description found in Silappadhikaram and Paripadal
in describing a nonbu that is performed at the conclusion of which
a dip is taken in Sangam (where the river enters the sea)
of Kaveri or Vaigai followed by a worship to Manmathan.
In all these occasions, there is an underlying benefit
connected to this nonbu.


That is about good rainfall
both monthly and yearly spell is assured.
The 3 spells every month and
good rainfall in the rainy season.
The worship in this period therefore comes with a blessing for good rain fall.
Andal begins her nonbu with a sankalp in the first two pasurams.

In the first pasuram,
the time, the people who perform the nonbu and
the goal of the nonbu are described.
In the second paasuram, she goes on to lay down
the dos and don'ts to be followed by the performers.
But from that, she goes on to the next important feature of the nonbu,
the universal benefit - that of bountiful rainfall.


It must be remembered that even in Thirukkural,
after the initial prayer (kadavul vaazhtthu),
the next prayer is for good rainfall (vaan sirappu).
Because the world sustains only by water.
The concern for the world was prime in the minds of the people of this land.
Andal exhibits that exemplary Sanatanic mind.


The 3rd pasuram tells what happens
when they perform the nonbu,
"Theengindri naadellam thingal mummari peidu"
The 4 th pasuram tells about GarbOttam
the initial conditions that must happen so that
it would rain plentifully in the season.
From Brihat samhita we come to know that conducive conditions
for pregnancy of clouds in this month,
as aided by the sun in Pooradam
will result in good rainfall after 195 days.


Andal's mention about rainfall in the 3rd and 4 th pasuram,
soon after her sankalpa,
is an additional proof that Maargazhi began in her time
with the sun in Pooradam!
That is 1000 years behind our present times!


Related post:-

-->

The kings mentioned by Periaazhwar!



************

-->
Up-dated on 23-07-2010

From

Date of Periyalvar


Among the Vaishnavite Alvars, Periyalvar refers in his verse to Pandyan Ko-Nedumaran.
That Periyalvar was a contemporary of Nedumaran is thus established. Prof. K. A. Nilakanta Sastri says that "all that we can infer is that if this Nedumaran is the same as the contemporary of Jnanasambandar, this Alvar may also be assigned to their age and likewise his daughter Andal. It seems more likely that the reference is to Srimara Srivallabha". Srimara Srivallabha is assigned to Circa 815-862. This probably influenced the learned Professor to prefer the later date.

T. A. Gopinatha Rao in his 'History of the Sri Vaishnavas,' has suggested that Periyalvar was a contemporary of Srimara Srivallalbha, identical with Srivallabha Avanipasekhara of Sittannavasal inscription. Mr. Rao's conclusion is based on the identity of the name Srivallabha, said to be a contemporary of Periyalvar according to Guruparampara.

M. Raghava Iyengar in his 'Age of the Alvars' differed from Gopinatha Rao and held that the contemporary of Periyalvar was Maravarman Rajasimha father of Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan. Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan was a Parama Vaishnava, who erected a Vishnu temple at Kanchivay Perur. Raghava Iyengar held that Parantaka derived his Vishnu-bhakti from his father Maravarman Rajasimha and that Rajasimha should have been converted to Vaishnavism by Periyalvar.

While discussing the date of Periyalvar two points deserve to be carefully noted. (1) The saint himself refers to a Pandya Ko-Nedumaran as his contemporary. (2) The Guruparampara refers to a Pandya Sri vallabha as his contemporary. We must look for a Pandya who had both these titles. Sri Mara, the son of Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan is called in the larger Sinnamanur and Dalavaypuram copper plates as Srivallabha. Srivallabha seems to have been his abishekanama, but whether he had the title Ko-Nedumara was not proved so far by any epigraph.

An epigraph coming from Erukkangudi, Sattur taluk. Ramnad District, published recently throws valuable light on the problem. It refers to Pandya Srivallabha, who conquered the places from Kunnur to Ceylon. The point of interest in this epigraph is that this Srivallabha is also called Ko-Nedumaran.

According to Sinnamanur and Dalavaypuram plates, Srimara Srivallabha, the son of Parantaka Varaguna I, won significant victories at Kunnur, Vilinjam, Kumbakonam and Ceylon. The Erukkangudi, inscription is evidently that of Srimara Srivallabha the son of Parantaka Varaguna, and that he had also the title Ko-Nedumaran.
There can hardly be any doubt that Periyalvar was a contemporary of this Ko-Nedumaran Srivallabha and should have flourished in the 9th century CE. On the other hand no epigraph has so far been found which gives either the title Srivallabha or Ko-Nedumaran to Rajasimha, whom Raghava Iyengar holds as the contemporary of Periyalvar. We therefore agree with T. A. Gopinatha Rao and K. A. N. Sastri, that the contemporary of Periyalvar was Srimara Srivallabha and that the Vaishnavite Saint flourished in the 9th century CE. Andal, the daughter of Periyalvar should also be assigned to the same period.


Date of Thirumangai

Scholars have discussed the problem of the date of Thirumangai Alvar in detail and have arrived at a satisfactory date. The date of this Alvar can be fixed with certain amount of accuracy as he refers to his contemporary Pallava ruler Nandi. Thirumangai lists his conquests which are corroborated by copper plates.

Thirumangai sings the battle of "Mannai" where Pallavamalla is said to have defeated the Pandya. This is also corroborated by another copper plate. In the Udayendram plates, Nandivarman's general, Udaya Chandra is praised for his victory over the Pandyasena at Mannaikkudigramma. (Mannaik-kudi grame Pandya-senam jitavan.) Udayendram plate was issued in the 21st regnal year of Nandivarman (752). The Pandya ruler who opposed Nandi was Maravarman Rajasimha.

Thirumangai also refers to the battle of Karuvur in which the Pallava is said to have won.
A new evidence has come to light regarding the battle of Karuvur which has not yet received due attention. The Dalavaypuram plates mention that Parantaka Varaguna, defeated the Pallava at Karuvur. This gets indirect confirmation from another source. Sivaramangalam plates refers to Parantaka's fight with Atiya, at Pugaliyur and Ayirur on the northern bank of the river Kaveri. These places are situated near Karur. The same charter also states, that Varaguna defeated the Pallava and Keralan, who came to help the Atiya. Evidently the battle of Pugaliyur was followed upto Karuvur where an indescive battle was fought. Both the Pallava and the Pandya claim victory at Karuvur. Whatever the result of the war may be, one thing is certain, that Thirumangai who sings this battle, was a contemporary of Nandivarman Pallavamalla and Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan.

Thus Thirumangai was a contemporary of two Pandya rulers Rajasimha I and Nedunjadaiyan. On the Pallava side, he was a contemporary of Nandivarman Pallavamalla.(731-796)

It must be mentioned that this Vaishnava Alvar, sings in one of his verse, Vairamegha who is generally identified with Dantivarma Pallava, who ruled in the first half of 9th century A.D. Thirumangai is therefore taken to be a contemporary of Dantis as well. But we have shown elsewhere that the title Vairamegha was a title of Nandivarman himself. As such we may assign Thirumangai to the reign of Nandivarman. Thus Thirumangai's date may be taken as 730-800CE.


Date of Nammalvar

Almost, the same period must be assigned to Nammalvar. Nammalvar sings Varagunamangai, and Srivaramangalam, both places established by Parantaka Nedunjadaiyan. Madhurakavi is said to be a desciple of Nammalvar. A Madhurakavi occurs as a minister of Pandya Parantaka I during the early years of his reign, as seen from the Anamalai epigraph. Madhura Kavi was dead at the time of Anamalai inscription. As such Nammalvar's end could be placed about 780 A.D. His date of birth would be circa 745 CE. Nammalvar had two other names which are significant. He was called Parankusa and Maran. In all probability the names Parankusa and Maran were derived after Arikesari Parankusa Maravarman of the Vaigai bed-epigraph. Vaishnavite tradition makes Thirumangai and Nammalvar contemporaries. Our studies also seem to point to the same direction. While the Guruparampara, makes Periyalvar, also a contemporary of Thirumangai and Nammalvar, our studies show that Periyalvar lived in the 9th century CE.


The Vaigai bed inscription of Cendan Maran has opened up new avenues of enquiry relating to the chronology of the early Pandyas and the history of Saivism and Vaishnavism in South India.

As a result of the above study the following are our conclusions:-

1) The Vaigai bed inscription is that of Cendan Maran who ruled atleast for 50 years (650-700 A.D.)

2) He was the hero of the Tamil work Pandikkovai.

3) The chronology of the early Pandyas could be placed at the beginning of about 560 A.D.

4) The city of Mangalapura established by Arikesari was located in the Pandya country.

5) But the Mangalapura where his son defeated the Maharatas is identical with Mangalore.

6) Appar was a contemporary of Mahendra, Mamalla and the Pandya Arikesari.

7) Appar's date would be circa 580-660 A.D.

8) Jnanasambandar was a contemporary of Mamalla I, and Pandya Arikesari Nedumaran.

9) Sambandar's date would be circa 640-656 A.D.

10) Thirumangai was a contemporary of Rajasimha and Nedunjadaiyan of the Pandyas and Nandivarman
Pallavamalla and may be assigned between 700 and 800.

11) Nammalvar's date would be about 745 to 780 A.D.

12) Periyalvar was a contemporary of Sri Mara Srivallabha and his date would be Circa 800-885.

13) Andal is to be assigned to the second half of 9th century.

14) The Vaigai bed inscription is an important landmark in the history of Tamilnadu.