The 2nd video in a series of videos based on my book "Myth of the Epoch of Arundhati of Nilesh Nilkanth Oak" critiquing the Epoch of Arundhati and the Mahabharata date deduced by Mr Nilesh Oak is now released. Tilted as "Arundhati Vasishtha observation is not a falsifier" this video concentrates on why Mr Nilesh Oak had picked out Arundhati observation as a falsifier and whether he is right in having chosen that.
The video highlights how Mr Nilesh Oak wanted to infuse scientific acumen and logical reasoning into Indic minds by using the Arundhati observation as a 'falsifier'. Then it brings into fore that Arundhati observation was not the only odd and impossible observation but it was one among 4 similar impossible observations - all of them nimittas - from which we get a clue on what caused them to appear so.
However Mr Nilesh Oak picked out Arundhati observation and treated it as a falsifier while in reality it fails to fulfill the definition of a falsifier, ultimately ending up doing nothing other than sullying the symbolism of Arundhati as a chaste woman.
This video is best viewed along with Part 1 titled "Did Arundhati walk in front of Vasishtha anytime in the past?" The link is here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnDVE60okLzlNi7wfJLEEeA?view_as=subscriber
The video highlights how Mr Nilesh Oak wanted to infuse scientific acumen and logical reasoning into Indic minds by using the Arundhati observation as a 'falsifier'. Then it brings into fore that Arundhati observation was not the only odd and impossible observation but it was one among 4 similar impossible observations - all of them nimittas - from which we get a clue on what caused them to appear so.
However Mr Nilesh Oak picked out Arundhati observation and treated it as a falsifier while in reality it fails to fulfill the definition of a falsifier, ultimately ending up doing nothing other than sullying the symbolism of Arundhati as a chaste woman.
This video is best viewed along with Part 1 titled "Did Arundhati walk in front of Vasishtha anytime in the past?" The link is here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnDVE60okLzlNi7wfJLEEeA?view_as=subscriber
Subscribe to my YouTube Channel
Related post:
1 comment:
Very interesting, with solid proof and arguments. I enjoyed viewing both parts.
Post a Comment