Wednesday, March 9, 2022

"Janamejaya inscription: Mahabharata's veracity proved" - My article in 'Organiser'

I am glad to share the link to my article on Janamejaya inscription found in the custody of Bhimanakatte Matha offering solid proof for the year of the Mahabharata war on 3136 BCE (Pre-Kali 35 years). I have spelt out the objections to this grant and offered my counters to them. I am thankful to the Editorial Team of Organiser, the esteemed magazine of the RSS for publishing the crucial piece of evidence for the year of the Mahabharata war at 3136 BCE and for the beginning of Kali Yuga on 3101BCE. 

From 

Janamejaya Inscription: Mahabharata’s Veracity Proved (organiser.org)

Janamejaya Inscription: Mahabharata’s Veracity Proved

Dr Jayasree Saranathan

DR JAYASREE SARANATHANMar 08, 2022, 12:19 PM IST                                           


The Janamejaya inscription, demonstrating the authenticity of the Mahabharata, was found to have been made 5,000 years ago. However, British historians were reluctant to accept that Bharat had such a thriving civilisation

Inscriptions are accepted as foremost primary evidence in historical studies. They belong to the genre of written documents or Lekhya Pramana approved by Shastras, according to the late Dr Nagaswamy, historian and preeminent epigraphist. 

The date of the inscription mentioned in Jyothisha units of time such astithi, star and week-day are therefore reliable. The dates of many kings and dynasties have been deciphered from the year of the Shaka or Kali Yuga found in the inscriptions.

Historicity of Mahabharata

In the same way, the year of the Mahabharata war can be derived using the well attested evidence of a 35-year gap between the war and Krishna’s exit given in four verses in the Mahabharatatext (MB: 11.25.4; 16.1.1; 16.2.2; 16.3.18,19). This makes locating the year of the war easy: it was pre-Kali 35 years. Counted from the completed Kali years as of today (that we continue to use for all religious purposes) 3136 BCE was the year of the Mahabharata war. Though there is no direct epigraphic evidence for this date, five inscriptions have been located so far, bearing the name of King Janamejaya, the great-grandson of Arjuna, as donor. This article highlights one that bears strong evidence for the year of the war and the historicity of the Mahabharata.

For people, who believed that the earth was created only 5,000 years ago, it could have been a rude shock that India had a thriving civilisation 5,000 years ago. Secondly, that was the time that the Aryan Invasion Theory was gaining momentum, which denied the indigenous origin of the Vedic culture and proposed that ‘Aryans’ from Europe brought the Vedic culture to India 3,500 years ago 

Janamejaya Inscription Down South 


Read the rest of the article here: Janamejaya Inscription: Mahabharata’s Veracity Proved (organiser.org) 
























4 comments:

Ak10 said...

Madam,i have a question.In ancient india during the time of mahabharata weekdays were not used it only came to use during the gupta period.So how come the inscription mentions vaara?

Jayasree Saranathan said...

There is no Vaara without Hora and Hora is a concept developed only around the equator.

I posted more than 20 articles in my blogspot on bogus claims about Greek origin.
Read this on Vaara-Hora https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2013/05/is-vedic-astrology-derived-from-greek_13.html

Another thing - Vaara is part of the 8 fold Time measurement developed by ancient Vedic people. Read my book 'Mahabharata 3136 BCE' to know the details. You will also know what else were picked from us by the Occident in the past.

Kashyap Sajeev said...

Ma'am, Shri Jijith Nandamuri Ravi claims a different date for Mahabharata,1700-1800 BC based on 3 things :

1.In puranas, it is mentioned that the time period between Mahapadma Nanda's coronation and Parikshit's birth was 1500 years maximum.Nanda's coronation was estimated around 382 BC. So, Kurukshetra war happened around 1700-1800 BC.
2.Aryabhatta's account also agrees with the the traditional date. But Jijith ji says that it is not a reliable source as it is after 1st century AD
3.
3.He also points out Sinauli chariot exacavation date and Dr. Ashok Bhatnagar's dating based on the precession of earth's axis and the shifting of equinoxes and solstices.
Please clarify my doubt 🙏

Jayasree Saranathan said...

Read my book "Mahabharata 3136 BCE"
Part 1 of the book running into 160+ pages replies all queries you have raised.
You may check the contents in ebook preview to know. Type my name + the book's nane to access the link