Part 2- Two
types of Yugas
Part 4 - Textualand epigraphic evidence of Dharma Yuga
All the
above parts in a single paper in academia can be downloaded HERE
Span of Human life
There are misconceptions about Yuga doing rounds,
the implications of which threaten the very rationale behind the Yuga concept.
This article addresses the issues around yuga including the length of life of
man in different yugas. To begin with let us see the issues around them and the
inconsistencies found in those issues.
Issues and inconsistencies:
The following are the basic and the most commonly
aired views on Yugas and related issues. The issues themselves look untenable
in the face of the inconsistencies ingrained in them.
Issue 1: When we say
‘yuga’, many people think that it is about the four yugas namely, Satya or
Krta, Treta, Dvapara and Kali maha yugas each running into lakhs of years. Of
these we are in the Kali Maha yuga, something well established in the Sankalpa
mantras. The preceding yuga of Dwapara must have gone on for 8,64,000 years and
Ramayana must have occurred before that as it had happened in Treta Yuga.
Inconsistency:
To say that Rama was born anytime before 8, 64,000 years sounds completely
irrational, because the Homo sapiens
that we are, have evolved only 3, 15,000 years ago. So by this Yuga scale we
are putting Ramayana in an unrealistic time period when man was not yet born. This
issue also derides the wisdom of the rishis, in that, those who had conceived the yuga scale running into millions of years
that match with reality, could not conceive the time period of man.
Issue 2: This unrealistic time frame makes Ramayana a
myth rather than a reality. It is not even possible to claim historicity of
Ramayana as everything from geological to climatic conditions could have been
different from now and from the description given in Ramayana. In this
background, nothing related to Ramayana including the Janma bhumi can be
claimed to be authentic.
Inconsistency:
The fact is that Ramayana is an Itihasa – a true chronicle of the life of Rama.
This is not possible if Rama was to have lived lakhs of years ago when the
geography, flora and fauna explained by Valmiki could not have existed. On the
other hand the flora, fauna and monsoonal description found in Valmiki Ramayana
match with the current era of Holocene.
Issue 3: The long years
of life attributed to Rama and Dasaratha match well with long life attributed
to people of those former yugas. Rama had ruled for 11000 years and Dasaratha
had lived for 60,000 years. And this concurs with Sanjaya’s version to
Dhritarashtra on span of life in different yugas. 3000 years was the measure of
life in Treta Yuga when Rama lived.
Inconsistency:
There are two inconsistencies in this issue: 1. the human body can’t exist for
that long. 2. If Rama had ruled for 11,000 years, it also means that all his
three brothers had lived that long. They were born around the same time and
departed along with him at the same time. Why is there no mention of the same
life span for Lakshmana and other brothers in Ramayana? Similarly if Dasaratha
had lived for 60,000 years, what was the life span of his three spouses who
outlived him? Why is there no mention about them?
A look at these issues and inconsistencies show that
somewhere there is a mismatch between our understanding of the Yuga-scale and the
age of man with what has been originally told by the rishis. So let us begin
from what the rishis had actually said about the life span of man.
The life span of man according to Vedic culture
Vedic Thought assigns basic life-span of 100 units
for the Creator God, that is, the Four-faced Brahma. Brahma lives for 100 years
of age. The duration of each year is measured by Yuga.
The same 100 units are assigned to human beings
also, but the duration is measured by years and seasons.
(1) From RV 1-89 -9.
The famous Shanti mantra “Bhadram karNebhi”
found in Mundaka, Mandukya and Prasna Upanishads belongs to Rig Vedic mantra on
Visvadevas seeking mainly healthy and long life. And how long the Rishi had asked
for? It is for 100 autumns! Within that time scale the body decays and the
children would have become fathers. Let there be no intervention within this
life span so that one may live a full life of 100 years.
“śatamin
nu śarado anti devā yatrā naścakrā jarasaṃ tanūnām |
putrāso yatra pitaro bhavanti mā no madhyā rīriṣatāyurghantoḥ ||”
putrāso yatra pitaro bhavanti mā no madhyā rīriṣatāyurghantoḥ ||”
“A hundred autumns stand before us, O ye Gods,
within whose space ye bring our bodies to decay;
Within whose space our sons become fathers in turn. Break ye not in the midst our course of
fleeting life.”
Within whose space our sons become fathers in turn. Break ye not in the midst our course of
fleeting life.”
What do we infer from this?
The human body decays within 100 years and it is not
possible to pull on beyond that. Issue no 3 is addressed here. Vedic Thought is
practical to the core and does not assign 1000s of years to people on earth.
(2) Mid-day prayers to Sun.
Of the three time salutations to the Sun known as Sandhyavandana,
the mid-day vandana prays for a life time of 100 autumns or years, nothing less
and nothing more. The prayer is to see the sun for 100 years, live for 100
years, live with joy and fame for 100 years, hear good words for 100 years and
live without being won by bad deeds for 100 years. Everything that one can
aspire for is asked for duration of 100 years only.
(3) Valmiki Ramayana 5-34-6
Sita also echoes the longevity of 100 years in her
dialogue with Hanuman at Ashoka vana. On seeing Hanuman having come to redeem
her from distress she utters an adage of her times, “yehi jivantam aanandho
naram varsha shathaath api”. It means ‘Happiness rushes to the surviving
man even though (it be) at the end of a hundred years”. Coming from Sita, this dialogue
and adage cannot be ignored as she lived in Treta Yuga when Dasaratha was said
to have lived for 60,000 years and Rama ruled for 11,000 years.
(4) Chandogya Upanishad 3-16.1 to 16.7
Human life is a yajna consisting of 3 phases. The
morning phase consists of 24 years, the noon phase consists of 44 years and the
evening phase consists of 48 years. Having known this, the sage Mahidasa also
known as Aitareya conquered diseases and lived for 116 years. One who realises
this lives for 116 years.
All the above shows that there was no confusion
among the ancient rishis on how many years man can expect to live. It is for 100
years. There are other verses in addition to the above but they don’t exceed
120 years. Parasra foresees a maximum of 120 years for human beings in his
work, Brihad Parasara Hora Sastra. But the general life expectancy is 100 years
of age that is well established in the hymn of blessing - ‘Shatamaanam
bhavathi shataayu: purusha:…’ Anything other than this span of life cannot
be taken at face value. One must apply discriminatory sense of knowledge to
understand such passages.
Contradiction to 100 years of age.
Having known that Vedic Thought had pitched for only
100 years of life, any passage to the contrary must be understood without
transgressing this notion. Rishis were always fond of telling things secretly.
They had not given us everything as ready-made. They had wanted us to think,
imbibe and churn out thoughts that are in consonance with what they had given. In
this backdrop, the verses from Mahabharata on life span in the 4 yugas must be
studied.
Sanjaya tells Dhritharashtra in Mahabharata (6- 10),
that 4000 years is the measure of life in Krita Yuga; 3000 in Treta yuga and
2000 in Dwapara Yuga. There is no fixed duration of life in Kali yuga. Some
people tend to interpret this as actual life span of a person in those yugas
which is against Nature and also against Vedic wisdom – some of which were
outlined above. When we look at these verses along with the context, the
context unravels the mystery of the numbers of other yugas.
While expressing the number of years in Kali yuga,
Sanjaya does not give a number but just says that people die in the womb and also
as soon as after birth. This is not so in the other yugas, where men get
children in hundreds and thousands. Dying in the womb or at an young age means
that the lineage gets ended with them. This means two things (1) the physical
valour, energy and heath are low in Kali yuga to procreate and sustain life
after birth and (2) there is no continuing lineage of a person for many
generations in Kali yuga. One can witness lineages being short or coming to an
end abruptly in Kali yuga. That is the import.
This was not so in the earlier yugas with Krita yuga
leading on top. Begetting progeny in hundreds and thousands cannot be taken to
mean literally but could mean that there was an unbroken and continuing lineage
in those yugas. In the Rig Vedic verse quoted above, the prayer was to live for
100 years within which time sons become fathers. This verse visualizes a
continuing thread of the lineage. At the
most the lineage continued unbroken for 4000 years in Krita yuga. It was so for
3000 years in Treya Yuga when Ramayana happened. The list of ancestors of Rama
and Sita narrated at the time of their marriage shows how their family tree had
continued to exist before them uninterruptedly. This is not the case with
people born in Kali yuga.
Have people lived
across Yugas?
There is another issue in this context of people
having lived across yugas. Persons like Hanuman and Muchukunda had appeared in
different yugas. There are others too who are supposed to live permanently for
ever (chiranjeevi). Is this possible? What do texts say about this?
Hanuman of Treta Yuga appeared to Bheema of Dwapara
yuga in Mahabharata 3:145-148. (In his dialogue with Bheema, Hanuman describes
the yuga system). His appearance in another yuga as an evidence of continuing
existence makes some people think that here is a case of long life of 1000s of
years of those yugas.
In this context let me draw the attention of readers
to a similar incident reported in recent times. Many would have heard about Tirumalai
Krishnamacharya, the ‘Father of Modern Yoga’. The Yoga
as we know today has sprung up from him. How did he get his knowledge about
Yoga? It was from his distant ancestor Nathamuni,
the first Acharya of Srivaishnava tradition. Nathamuni himself had received all
the hymns of Divya Prabhanda from Nammazhwar of by-gone times, who appeared in
person before him cutting across time.
In a somewhat similar way Natahmuni
appeared to Krishnamacharya and imparted his composition on Yoga sastra. (Read
“The Yoga of the Yogi: The Legacy of T. Krishnamacharya” by T.
Krishnamacharya’s grandson Kausthub Desikachar). In today’s language we can say
that Nathamuni did a time travel to the 20th century and imparted
his knowledge to Krishnamacharya. In traditional language of the Vedic culture
it can be said that Nathamuni
continues to live across Time.
Similar instances like this have been reported from
time to time. The appearance of Hanuman and Muchukunda in different time
periods can also be explained in this way. There is a textual authority for
this kind of long life cutting across Time.
In his book Brihad Parasara Hora sastra, sage
Parasara does mention about the probability of very long life to those born
under certain planetary conditions. Certain
combinations in Dasa varga give rise to limitless
longevity, living till the end of a yuga and living the life span of a sage.
(Verses 55-58 in the chapter on ‘Longevity’). These combinations give rise to
yogis and siddhas who live beyond their destructible physical form and appear
as they are and at will to those to whom they want to appear.
By having appeared to Krishnamacharya a century ago,
we may say that sage Nathamuni had lived for a definite span of 1000 years.
Hanuman will live for as long as Rama nama lives on earth. His yogic power and
determination will make him live across the millennia and appear to those whom
he wants to.
What is implied is that some persons are endowed
with a very long life span, and are not bound by physical laws. But they are
exceptions. They cannot be quoted as examples for long life supposedly
associated with yugas.
People living for 1000s of years – myth or reality?
There is a basic measure of life for man (quoted
above) and Vedic culture identified it as 100 years. This is true
scientifically too. But there is also a tradition in the same Vedic culture to assign
numerous numbers of years to a person. Particularly kings have been praised as
having 1000s of years of life. King Dasaratha lived for 60,000 years; Rama
ruled for 11,000 years; and in the Tamil lands, the Pandyan king Maakeerti in
whose court Tolkappiyam of the 3rd Sangam age (started around 1500
BCE) was inaugurated, was in throne for 24,000 years.
Though all this looks like poetic exaggerations,
there is a calculation behind them. This is known from the Tamil Sangam
composition called ‘Paditru Patthu’, in which the poet ‘Perum kundrur Kizhar’
gives the following equation for the age of the Cheran king ‘Kudakko Ilanjeral
Irumporai’. (verse 90)
1 day in King’s life = 1 month
1 month = 1 year
1 year = 1 Oozhi (duration not known, but it refers
to deluge)
1 Oozhi = 1 Varambu (duration not known, but could
refer to deluge after a Mahayuga)
Similar view is echoed in Mahabharata wherein Bheema
says that for an exalted person observing certain difficult vows of Vedic
culture, one day (ahorātraṃ) is equal to one year. Yudhsithira was one such
exalted person. At the expiry of first thirteen days after they commenced
exile, he is deemed to have completed 13 years in exile. Therefore they can go
back to Kauravas and reclaim their lands.
21 tathā bhārata dharmeṣu dharmajñair iha dṛśyate
ahorātraṃ mahārāja tulyaṃ saṃvatsareṇa hi
22 tathaiva veda vacanaṃ śrūyate nityadā vibho
saṃvatsaro mahārāja pūrṇo bhavati kṛcchrataḥ
23 yadi vedāḥ pramāṇaṃ te divasād ūrdhvam acyuta
trayodaśa samāḥ kālo jñāyatāṃ pariniṣṭhitaḥ )
(Mahabharata 3-49).
This tradition if applied to Rama, equates 11,000
years of his rule to 31 years. The same applied to Pandyan king Maakeerti shows
that 24,000 years of his rule was actually for 66.6 years.
The same rule if applied to Dasaratha who was
supposed to have ruled for 60,000 years comes to an unrealistic span of years.
So here we have to apply discriminatory sense of understanding. The king was
old and was in throne for a long time. It appeared that even 60 years of his
age or rule looked like 60,000 years!
The underlying idea is that time is relative with
respect to experiences and perceptions! The period of 14 years of exile was not
expressed as a long period in Ramayana. But the one year of confinement in
Lanka could have been felt like an aeon by Sita. In this connection one can
quote a story involving sages Vasishtha and Vishwamitra in which a second of satsanga
offered by Vasishtha was able to hold the weight of the world held by
Adisesha, than 16,000 years of tapas of Vishwamitra!
True nature of things, if can be known better by
long measures of time, then rishis have indulged in such kind of talks. It is
for us to understand their messages without violating the basic norms set by
them.
Rule of Rama for 11,000 years.
In Valmiki Ramayana, Narada tells Valmiki that for
11,000 years “Ramo rajyam upaasitva Brahma lokam prayaasyati” (VR 1-1-97).
There is an incongruity in this verse.
Does this verse convey that Rama lived for long as
to be in the throne for 11,000 years? It is not possible, for, this is contrary
to the 100 year concept of Vedic culture.
Then how to reconcile the incongruity?
The reverence to Rama and Rama rajya (Rama-rajyam
upaasitva) continues to exist till this date in this country.
Before entering the Sarayu Rama tells Hanuman, “As
long as my story is spoken off in this world, till then bear your praana as per
my commands" (VR:7- 98-25)
So Hanuman continues to be around, as Rama-nama is
still being chanted. So the Rama rajya of 11,000 years is not yet over.
When Rama is completely forgotten, that marks the
end of 11,000 years of Rama’s rule. At that time Rama in the form as the king
of Ayodhya would have faded from memory – thereby implying that it had reached
the realms of Brahma Loka. Within this period of 11,000 years, Rama can appear
to anyone whom he wills. Beyond that period, He can still appear in any form to
those who aspire to see Him, for, He is Brahman. This feat is possible for
Brahman anytime and at all times, in the grand scale of Time
Next we will move on to what is Yuga and what is
meant by the long years associated with Yugas.
Time scale in vogue in the 19th century
We generally believe that the Chatur Yuga system was
in vogue all these days. This is based on the Sankalpa mantra in which time is
counted from Kali yuga that started in 3101 BCE in the Gregorian calendar. But
there were different yuga systems in use in different parts of India at the
time of British occupation. Prominent one was Parasurama yuga of 1000 year
duration followed in the regions of Malaya from Mangalore to Cape comorin. (See
here). In south Indian regions including Madurai,
Grahaparivrithi cycle of 90 years was in use. In other regions, the eras named
after kings were in use.
However the 60 year cycle of Jupiter era was widely
in use across India and also in Tibet. A modified form of it was in use in
China. The names of the years of this cycle of Jupiter continue even now
throughout India (Prabhava etc). These 60 years keep repeating endlessly in
this system. This system of Jupiter has its origins in Vedanga Jyothisha of Rig
Veda. Its basal unit consists of 5 years which was originally called as a YUGA!
(to be continued)
1 comment:
Year span is dependent on Loka. So if Rshi resident of BrahmaLoka utters a prayer for 100 years it means 100 years of BrahmaLoka(1 Ghati of BrahmaLoka = about 27.7 Chaturyugi).
On Svarga it would mean 100 Divya years(100x360 Manushya years). On Jupiter it means 100 Jovian(100x60 Manushya years). On Saptarshi Loka it means 100 Arsha years(100x3030 Manushya years). On DhruvaLoka it means 100 Dhrauvya years(100x9090 Manushya years). And so on.
Post a Comment