Wednesday, January 20, 2021

Krishna left and Kali Maha Yuga started: Resolving the controversies on Kali and Shaka (Part 27: Mahabharata date)

Previous 
Next

Vaisampayana opens the 16th chapter, Mausala Parva with these words,

ṣaṭ triṃśe tv atha saṃprāpte varṣe kauravanandana
      dadarśa viparītāni nimittāni yudhiṣṭhiraḥ
(16-1)

When the thirty-sixth year (after the battle) was reached, the delighter of the Kurus, Yudhishthira, beheld many unusual portents.” (Ganguli’s translation)


viparītāni nimittāni were many - terrestrial, atmospheric and celestial that included meteor showers and unusual appearance of the solar and lunar discs. Short while later the king Yudhishthira received the news of the destruction of the Vrishinis.

The narration then shifts to Dwaraka, wherein many inauspicious and odd omens were seen for some time. Some peculiar planetary movements were noticed. The stars were repeatedly attacked by the planets. None among the Yadavas could, however, obtain a sight of the star of his birth.[1]  This implies that the planets were crossing the same stars one after the other, which means that the planets were congregating together at some location of the zodiac.

Seeing this kind of planetary congregation and the other odd sightings on the earth and the atmosphere, Krishna thought that the Time has come – something similar to what was witnessed during the Bharata war. His thoughts were already written in detail in Part 21 in the context of the solar eclipse on the 19th day of the war at the time of the mace fight.

“By seeing (the adverse omens) Krishna understood that the Time (of wheel) had come to a revolution. Having seen Amawasya in Trayodasi at that time (in the past), he began to speak that Caturdasi made into Pancadasi by Rahu at the battle of the Bharatas is (there) now for our destruction.” [2]

The extended tithi of Caturdasi into Pancadasi recalled here, hints at the day being Caturdasi extending into the next day. Krishna recalled Gandhari’s curse and “understood that the thirty-sixth year had come, and that what Gandhari, burning with grief on account of the death of her sons, and deprived of all her kinsmen, had said was about to transpire.” [3]

“putraśokābhisaṃtaptā gāndhārī hatabāndhavā

     yad anuvyājahārārtā tad idaṃ samupāgatam

He also thought, “The present is exactly similar to that time when Yudhishthira noted at such awful omens when the two armies had been arrayed in order of battle.” [4]

Thinking so, Krishna commanded the Vrishnis to go on a pilgrimage to the sacred site on the sea shore. Once they reached the sea shore hell broke loose and mutual destruction of each other followed. Following the destruction of the Vrishnis, Krishna left home after summoning Daruka to bring Arjuna to take care of the women and the wealth. Hastinapur located at a distance of nearly 1400 kilometres from Dwaraka, Daruka could have taken a day to reach Hastinapur and the return journey with Arjuna must have taken another day. Daruka delivering the news of the destruction of the Vrishnis must have coincided with Yudhishthira having noticed the nimittas just then. Perhaps those nimittas marked the time of Krishna leaving. That could be Pancadasi when Amawasya turned into a solar eclipse. 

After sending Daruka to Hastinapur, Krishna proceeded to the forest where he found Balarama in Yoga, leaving the earth. This must have been the day of Amawasya. Sitting down on the bare earth and thinking of Gandhari’s curse, of the previous slaughter of the Kurus and the mutual destruction of Vrishnis short while ago, he thought it was time to leave the earth and laid himself down on the earth and entered into Maha-yoga.

A hunter named Jara seeing him from a distance, draped in his famous yellow garments, mistook him for a deer and shot his arrow piercing Krishna’s heel. Krishna left the world, and Kali entered the world.

The day Krishna left the world was astronomically and historically the same day from when the 4th Maha Yuga started ticking.

The day was marked by the congregation of all the planets except Rahu at the beginning of Aries (Figure 1).The gathering of the planets was already noticed by Krishna.

Fig 1: The day Krishna left the world – the conjunction of all the planets except Rahu

From Mahabharata to Bhagavata Purana we find a continuity of events following the exit of Krishna. In the very beginning of Bhagavata Purana, Vyasa repeats the bad omens seen by Yudhishtira at the exit of Krishna as was described in Mahabharata. When Arjuna brings the bad news about Krishna’s departure, Vyasa says (in Suta’s narration) the Kali has manifest fully at the exit of Krishna.

yadā mukundo bhagavān imāṁ mahīṁ
 jahau sva-tanvā śravaṇīya-sat-kathaḥ
tadāhar evāpratibuddha-cetasām
 abhadra-hetuḥ kalir anvavartata
[5]

Meaning: “When the Personality of Godhead, Lord Kṛṣṇa, left this earthly planet in His selfsame form, from that very day Kali, who had already partially appeared, became fully manifest to create inauspicious conditions for those who are endowed with a poor fund of knowledge.”[6]

The day of mass conjunction of the planets marks the cut-off date of Time. The date of conjunction was 22nd January, 3101 BCE in the year Pramathi, on a Thursday when the sun and the moon joined at the beginning of Aries at the star Aswini causing a solar eclipse.

This date is coming along without any controversy by the Pancanga writers who are the custodians of time till now. The Jyothisha Siddhantas are the main sources of authority for this time computation. Unfortunately these two are forgotten or set aside inadvertently by those who are not even aware of the time Kali Yuga started or the factor that marked the start of this Yuga. Let me address those issues before going ahead with the post-Krishna events.

The ayanamsa factor.

The foremost problem is that none could get the planetary congregation in the simulators – the reasons were already written and are now repeated again. Without having incorporated in the simulators, the zero degree ayanamsa position running at the time of Kali Yuga, the Kali Yuga congregation cannot be obtained. I am able to show the congregation using the correct ayanamsa embedded in Surya Siddhanta model – the model that was personally observed over thousands of years by the ancient sages.  

Even the attempts to manually calculate using the planetary longitudinal tables could not get the date or the congregation right for the reason that those tables were given from the equinoctial point of the time of the persons who computed them. The continuous change in the trepidation is the cause for the slightly different values, given by different Indic texts of different times of the past.

It should be noted that even at the present times, there is a sudden increase in the trepidation of the equinoctial point and the earth had rotated faster than average on 28 days in the year 2020 alone, noticed for the first time in the last fifty years.[7] No one knows if there is any correlation between the two, but what is known is that the rate of movement of the precession is not constant. This makes dating the past events difficult. Fortunately in the case of Mahabharata, the zero ayanamsa of at the beginning of Kali Yuga serves as a solid ground to corroborate the planetary combinations. 

In this backdrop the proof of reliability of the Surya Siddhanta Ayanamsa for dating Kali Yuga (and Mahabharata) is seen in the stipulated congregation of all the planets except Rahu at the beginning of Aries (Figure 1)

Kali Yuga measured by planets.

We often find people making claims that kali Yuga started during the Mahabharata war, citing verses stating that Kali had ushered in. This was discussed in Part 1 and shown why it was not valid.

This claim is rejected outright on the simple premise that such a proposition makes Krishna, an avatāra of Dvapara Yuga to live across two yugas – Dvapara and Kali Yuga – which is totally against the Yuga- avatāra connection. The ratio of the number of years of the four yugas starting from Krita is 4:3:2:1 which is also the same for the number of avatāras in the four Yugas. Krishna and Balarama were the two avatāras of Dvapara Yuga; they cannot be shifted to Kali Yuga due to our inability to corroborate the Kali Maha Yuga at the time of the exit of the two.

Any reference to Kali beforehand could therefore suggest the decline in Dharma and not the arrival of the Kali Yuga, mainly because the Yugas are noted in terms of the planetary movements. Krishna noticed it in the planets crossing the same stars one after the other. The Yuga concept is basically about Time and we have seen how Time is cosmically created and not by what we do. Siddhantas are the authority for deciding the date of the Yuga.

Aryabhata says,

“The Yuga, the year, the day and the month commenced simultaneously at the beginning of the light half of Caitra. This time which is without beginning and end, is measured with the help of planets and the asterisms of the celestial sphere.”[8]

The planets and the stars, being the factors of measurement of the Time of the Yuga, the claims that Kali Yuga started at the time of war are automatically rejected.

In this statement of Aryabhata, there is a scope for a controversy. Commencement at the light half of Caitra could refer to the solar month because the lunar month soon after the conjunction was Vaishakha. Since the first day of the Yuga was counted from the day after conjunction, i.e. Shukla Pratipat, it could not have been lunar Caitra unless it was Nija Caitra. In the absence of an evidence of an Adhika masa at the time of conjunction (in the simulator), to be followed by Nija Caitra, it is deduced that the verse refers to the waxing phase present in the solar Caitra or Mesha. The lunar Vaishakha starting from the first day of the Yuga explains why the year beginning is reckoned from lunar Vaishakha in some parts of India.

The other popular Siddhanta, namely Siddhanta Shiromani authored by Bhaskara II repeats the same, but qualified with an additional input. It states,[9]

Six Manus had elapsed in this Kalpa, thereafter thirty seven yugas, as well as three yuga padas, namely, Krita, Treta and Dvapara. Further 3179 years of this fourth yuga pada namely Kali have elapsed by the end of the Shaka king.”

3179 is the number of elapsed years since Kali Yuga began. This marks this 3rd Shaka Era which is the current Era of Shalivahna Shaka. Many olden Pancanga aphorisms are there to calculate any date in this Shaka starting from the first year of the Shalivahana Shaka in 78 CE. By adding 3179 to the current year of the Shaka one gets the Kali Year date which started in 3101 BCE.

This knowledge is now getting derailed by the Mahabharata researchers – none of whom got the Kali Yuga date right. Having entered the dating research with no inkling of any of these concepts they are bringing in “Cyrus the Great”, a Mleccha into the picture and claim that his Era was referred by Bhaskara II.

Resolving the confusion in Shaka kala.

With information dissemination happening now, they bring in all terms Shakendra Kala, Shakabhoopa Kala and Shaka-anta kala in to Kali Yuga Time scale.

As far as Kali Yuga time scale is concerned only six shaka eras have been mentioned. They are [10]

Yudhistira Era

Vikrama Era

Salivahana Era

Vijayabhinanda Era

Nagarjuna Era

Bali Era.

The years allotted to all these Eras add upto 4,32,000 years – the exact duration of Kali Yuga.

 

All these are based on some sort of cosmic time measurement.

For example in  Yudhsihthira shaka, the year was marked by Uttarayana.

It changed into Caitra in Full moon in Vikrama Era and Caitra No-moon in Shalivahana.

Moreover the Pancanga features (Year, month, paksha, star and weekday) would repeat at the lapse of 3780 years. [11] This means a combination of these five on a day, say, in the year 1 of kali Yuga (3100 BCE) would repeat in the year 680 CE. This causes problems in identifying dates of the past beyond 3780 years. It is my conjecture that a new era was necessitated to avoid this. The initial one was Vikrama Era which however failed to be compatible with most of India since it started the year in the Full Moon which was not in vogue in many parts of India. Perhaps due to this, a revision was introduced in 78 CE by ushering in Shalivahana Era.

The next Era is going to start after 18,000 years. Not surprising given the fact that our countrymen have to go that long to undersatnd the basic features of Kali Yuga!

To contain these explanations going too long, let me focus on the conetntious issue, on Shaka. That is a verse in Brihat samhita by Varahamira which the researchers are using to push in their wrong theory of Shaka and on Sapta rishi yuga. To know what that verse says, let me do a word for word meaning of the verse.

The verse states,[12]

आसन् मघासु मुनयः शासति पृथ्वीं युधिष्ठिरे नृपतौ।

षड्-द्विक-पञ्च-द्वि (२५२६) युतः शककालस्तस्य राज्ञस्य॥

आसन्= āsan = Halting, stopping, abiding, staying, sitting  (third person plural present imperfect class 2 parasmaipada √as )

मघासु = maghāsu = in the lunar mansion Maghā (feminine locative plural stem: magha)SB 12.2.31

मुनयः = munayas = the sages (masculine nominative, vocative plural stem: muni)

शासति = śāsati -= to command, to control  (third person plural present present class 2 parasmaipada √śās)

पृथ्वीं = pruthvim = earth (Accusative)

युधिष्ठिरे = in Yudhihsthira (singular masculine locative)

नृपतौ = king (singular masculine locative)

षड्-द्विक-पञ्च-द्वि = 2526

युतः = yutas = Binding, fastening, attaching, going (masculine nominative singular past passive participle stem: yuta)

शककालस्तस्य = shaka kālas tasya – his shaka kaala,

Tasya = about this (SB 10.89.2), at him (SB 11.23.9), by him (SB 1.9.17, SB 9.14.42, SB 10.70.24)

राज्ञस्य = by (of) the king (singular masculine Genitive)

Overall meaning:

 

The earth was controlled by the king Yudhishthira in his shaka kala of 2526 (years) (when) the Saptarṣis (muni) were in Maghā (star)

The Shaka era mentioned here is that of Yudhishthira and not of anyone else, particularly not “Cyrus the Great” which is a complete anathema to the concept of Shaka.[13]

Why this specific year stated?

The speciality of this date – Yudhishthira Shaka 2526 when the Sapta rishis were in Magha is demystified in Srimad Bhagavatam!

Srimad Bhagavatam (SB) also talks about the Saptarishis on Magha.

Before talking about it SB makes a clear statement again that the Age of Kali started only from the time Krishna left the world. (Figure 2) This is same as what Vyasa told in the first chapter of Srimad Bhagavatam quoted earlier.(SB: 1-15-36)

        Fig 2: Kali started only after Krishna returned to His world.

In the next verse this is being repeated as though to clear the doubts of people who read the verses such as “prāptaṃ kaliyugaṃ viddhi” in their face value. [14] (Figure 3) As long as Krishna was there, Kali could not enter.

       Fig 3: Kali could not enter as long as Krishna was around.

After stating explicitly that Kali did not enter the world as along as Krishna was living on this earth, SB makes a statement that Kali started from the time the Saptarishis started occupying Magha.

When the constellation of the seven sages is passing through the luanr mansion Maghā, the Age of Kali begins. It comprises twelve hundred years of the demi-Gods[15] (Figure 4) This date corresponds to Brihat samhita date of Kali / Yudhishthira 2526. After 2526 years of Kali Maha Yuga, the true Age of Kali began.


              Fig 4: Kali begins when the Seven sages pass through Magha

This is reiterated in the next verse that “When the graet sages of the Saptarishi constellation pass from Magha to Purvashadha, Kali will have his full stregnth, beginning from King Nanda and his dynasty.[16] (Figure 5) 


                 Fig 5: Kali aggrevates further

Then what was the kali at 3101 BCE when all the planets congregated and krishna left? Vyasa clarifies in the very next verse that, “ Those who scientifically understand the past declare that on the very day that Lord Sri Krishna departed for the spiritual world, the influence of the Age of Kali began.[17] (Figure 6)

                Fig 6: The original date of Kali at the exit of Krishna

The word “Pura-vidah” is used to show the source from which this knowledge that Kali Yuga started only after Krishna left the world. Pura means olden, formerly, in the beginning. Vida means knowledge. Its meaning is reproduced from the sanskrit dictionary in Figure 7.

                                      Fig 7: Meaning of “Vida” in Pura- vida.

In the beginning, (this is told by Vyasa who authored Mahabharata in his other work,Srimad Bhagavatam) the knowledgeable seers had gathered and decided that Kali Yuga started only at the time Krishna left.

How did they make this discovery?

They had seen the congregation of all the planets which is mandatory for the measurement of Yuga and found that Krishna left at the moment of that congregation.

They decided the start of Kali Yuga at that moment; we are just specks of dust before them. Anyone disregarding that knowledge given by the sages and stated by Vyasa, is unfit to research Mahabharata!

Vyasa had repeated this idea in two verses before starting to identify Saptarishis at Magha  related to Kali.[18]

So the whole issue about Brihat Samhita verse on saptarishis in Magha star is not about a Shaka era of Cyrus, but about deterioration of the Dharma in Kali Yuga. His verse is a re-statement of Srimad Bhagavatam verse.

To re-cap it, originally the Age of Kali (Kali Yuga) started only from the time Krishna left the world. This is repeated in 4 verses of Srimad Bhagavatam as given above. That was the date when all the planets except Rahu congregated at the beginning of Aries – stated by Siddhantas, the authoritative books on Time and approved by “Pura-vida” The calculation of Time that is happening till now follows this only. Janamejaya’s inscription cited in Figure 3 in Part 1followed the date of this Kali Yuga started from the time of Krishna’s exit. From that time it was known as Yudhishthira Shaka. Janamejaya’s inscription mentions “Yudhsihtrashake” giving the year counted from Yudhishthira Shaka  which is also the Kali year.

By Yudhsithira Shaka 2526, the command of Yudhishthira’s rule, his code of ethics and Dharma seemed to have faded. That date is marked by the Saptarishis in Magha verse. In the next 1000 years it further deteriorated  (425 CE). After this Uttarayana started before reaching Makara (Capricorn). [19] This would bring evil, says Varahamihira.[20]  Another 1500 years passsed away before our current times. There is nothing worthy of telling for the state of Kali now and so Vyasa refrained from saying anything beyond.

The bungling of Mahabharata date and the forgotten knowledge Kali Yuga testify how we are beyond redemption.

With a heavy heart let us go back to where we left.. Arjuna arriving at Dwaraka.

(To be continued)



[1] Mahabharata: 16-3-14

parasparaṃ ca nākṣatraṃ hanyamānaṃ punaḥ punaḥ

     grahair apaśyan sārve te nātmānas tu kathaṃ cana

[2] Mahabharata: 16-3 -16 & 17

[3] Mahabharata: 16-3-19

[4] Mahabharata: 16-3-20

[5]Bhagavata Purana: 1-15-36

[8] Aryabhatiya: Ch.3- Kalakriya Pada. “Aryabhatiya of Aryabhata” edited and translated by Kripa Shankar Shukla.

[9] Siddhanta Shiromani: Madhyadhikara, section I, v.28

[10] Kalidasa, “Jyotirvidabharana” 4-89

[11] LCM of 60, 12, 30, 27 and 7 respectively for the features given.

[12] Brihat Samhita: 13-3

[13] The founder of the Shaka era in Kali Yuga is one who defeated a Shaka (Mleccha) ruler.

[14] Mahabharata: 9-59-21

[15] Srimad Bhagavatam: 12-2-31

[16] Srimad Bhagavatam: 12-2-32

[17] Srimad Bhagavatam: 12-2-33

[18] Srimad Bhagavatam: 12-2- 29 & 30

[19] This is about the point of Precession (sun at the backdrop of stars) that started moving south of Makara which is never treated as auspicious by the sages. Presently we are in this part.

[20] Varahamihira, “Brihat Samhita”, Ch. 3-4

Saturday, January 16, 2021

Month- Tithi-Nakshatra alignment for 58 days of Bhishma’s waiting period (Part 23: Mahabharata date).

 Previous

Next

Bhishma said that he waited for 58 days to leave this earth, while Krishna mentioned 56 days. To know when exactly the first day of the 58-day period commenced, let me construct the tithi-star alignment from the known factor. The known factor is Magha Shukla Ashtami coinciding with Rohini when Bhishma left his mortal coils. To recap the verses discussed in Part 4, Uttarayana started after the completion of Saptami in Shukla Paksha of Magha (13-153-28) and the moon was in Rohini at the time of sunrise on that day (12-47-3).[1] From that day let me list out the days on the reverse till the first day. (Figure 1)

Fig 1: 58 days of Bhishma Nirvana with star-tithi

The biggest revelation of this reverse counting is that 58 or 56 day period did not begin on the 10th day of the war when Bhishma fell. It started from the beginning of the war. The number of days listed here pertains to solar risings (solar days). Bhagavad Gita was rendered on the 2nd day in this table. Krishna having killed Bhishma on that day, the remaining days turned out to be only 56!

1. Points of synchronization:

1. The first day falls in Pushya month. This concurs with my derivation done in previous parts that the war started in Pushya month. It didn’t start in Margashira or in Kartika.

2. The Full-Moon occurred in the beginning of this list of days concurring with Drona’s mention of the lunar eclipse rising with horns pointing downwards.

3. The counting of Bhishma’s waiting period includes the entire war period. This is close to the count-down that started from the time of Gitopadesa that was interpreted from Krishna’s version in Part 22.

2. Points of non-synchronization.

1. Shukla Ekadasi, the traditional date of Gita Jayanti comes within the initial period of this data.

2. The 18 day war period doesn’t synchronize with the date after Shukla Ekadasi (Gita Jayanti).

3. Paurnami coincides with Mrigashirsha in the above table (Fig 1) whereas it should have been on Punarvasu.

The non-synchronisation is due to the variance of tithi-star alignment.

The moon makes 62 synodic revolutions and 67 star rounds in the 5 year Yuga. As a result the moon takes 1.028 tithi to cross a star.[2]  The tithi exceeds the star such that the tithi and the star do not match. The 1st day of the war is reproduced here from Fig 1 of Part 19 to show that Rohini coincided with Shukla Dwadasi (Figure 2), but in the hand-made list (Figure 1) Rohini coincided with Shukla Caturdasi!

              Fig 2: The first day of the war

The presence of two tithis seen in the above simulation is a case of Tithi Dvayam. This is to imply that there was tithi-solar day mismatch and star-solar day mismatch within the 58 day reverse data.

The re-aligned Tithi-nakshatra- month for the first few days covering the 18 day Mahabharata period is produced below. It perfectly concurs with Mahabharata version of Shravana nakshatra when Balarama returned. Shravana was at sun rise on the 19th day when the mace- fight took place. This re-alignment is done in Figure 3 by matching Rohini- Mrigashirsha with Shukla Dwadasi (S-12) –Trayodasi (S-13) as noticed in the simulator.

Fig 3: The war period synchronized with star-tithi

The above table incorporating the re-aligned tithi- nakshatra perfectly matches with the 3rd day Full moon (lunar eclipse), the fall of Bhishma on the 10th day (when he started lying down on the arrow bed) and the Gada Yuddha in Shravana that coincided with the end of Balarama’s pilgrimage.

On the day of Bhishma’s fall the star was Hasta that matches with the simulation though it shows Shashthi tithi still running then (Figure 4)

Fig 4: The day of fall of Bhishma

Earlier I pointed out 12 hour difference between the actual time at the end of the tithi (and the lunar eclipse) on the 3rd day of the war and the simulated version, caused by an anomaly in the speed of moon. By that difference, it is theorized that Shashthi almost ended at the time of Bhishma’s fall, followed by Saptami.

 

1. The rationale of Krishna’s 56 days:

Starting from the day after Gitopadesa (when Krishna claimed he killed Bhishma) Bhishma lived for 56 days as per the table in Figure 1. A counter to this may be quoted from the verses uttered by Krishna at the cremation of Bhishma.[3] The Goddess of river Bhagirathi (Ganga), the mother of Bhishma was grief stricken at the death of her son Bhishma. Krishna consoled her by telling that Bhishma was not killed by anyone! He remained alive till he decided to cast off his body. This seems to run contradictory to Krishna’s claim during Vishvarupa that it was he who killed Bhishma. Since Bhishma was invincible until he decided to write on his own his time of death, Krishna’s words make better sense that the countdown for Bhishma Nirvana started at the time of Vishvarupa. 

2. Bhishma’s 58 days:

  • If we count from the first day of the war, Rohini was at sunrise. On the day of Uttarayana when Bhishma left it was again Rohini. In between only 54 stars had passed. Therefore Bhishma’s count was not star-based.
  • If we count the tithis, there are 57 tithis starting from the night of Shukla Ekadasi, on the day of Gitopadesa till the night of Magha Shukla Saptami.
  • If we count the tithis from the previous night when Pushya Shukla Dasami was running, there are 58 tithis. Starting the count from that time is justifiable on an important war-related activity.
  • Bharani was the star of the day then. Bharani is very well known for doing war- commencement Homa (Rana yajna)!
  • There is ample evidence in Tamil literature for symbolically starting the war on Bharani day by offering sacrifices to Pishaca (vampire) on that day. A separate literature called ‘Bharani’ literature is found in Tamil exclusively on war feats of the kings. The Chola King Kulottunga I’s Kalinga war was written as ‘Kalingatthu Bharani’ (The Bharani of Kalinga) in the form of a conversation among the vampires waiting for food, i.e. the bodies of the dead soldiers. Yet another popular Bharani in Tamil was on Daksha’s yajna, known as ‘Dakka Yāga Bharani’ (The Bharani of Daksha). This tradition, popular in the past must have been followed in any war including the Mahabharata war.[4] The commencement of the war occurring closer to Bharani strengthens this view.  A huge battle such as the Bharata war must have been fixed on a day designated for starting with the war-yajna and that day is Bharani.
  • Based on this, the re-aligned initial days of the war is shown in Figure 5.

Fig 5: The days before the war began

Bhishma as the chief Commander must have participated in Bharani Homa and was present in the war field right from the night of Shukla Dasami. Counting from that tithi, he slept in the war field for 58 tithis (till Magha Shukla Saptamī) enduring the hardships of the war field.

An overwhelming revelation is that the waiting period covered the entire war period.


The tithi-star-month alignment does not support 

the counting of Bhishma’s waiting period 

from the 10th day of the war.


The next issue pertains to what happened after Krishna asked Bhishma to impart knowledge to the Pandavas. As per the time-line deciphered so for, 

* the coronation took place on Magha Shukla Dwitīya

* Krishna and the Pandavas met Bhishma on Magha Shukla Tritiya.

Only four days were left for the Uttarayana day designated by Bhishma himself.

For how many days Bhishma imparted the knowledge?

More importantly on which day Bhishma delivered the “Vishnu Sahasranama” – the thousand names of Vishnu that continues to be recited reverentially till date?

What are the evidences from the Mahabharata giving us the answers for these?

 

(To be continued)



[1] Gita Press Edition

[2] No of synodic revolutions in 5 years = 62 (62 x 30 = 1860 tithi)

No of sidereal revolutions of the moon = 67 (67 x 27 = 1809 stars)

1809 stars = 1860 tithis, therefore 1 star = 1860 / 1809 = 1.028 tithi

[3]Mahabharata: 13- 154- 29 to 31

[4] Stealing the cattle as a prelude to attack a country and war dances were common throughout Bharatavarsha. They are incorporated as war traditions in the Tamil Grammar work called “Tol Kappiyam.” Bharani yajna was part of that tradition. Therefore it is presumed that Mahabharata war started with Bharani Yajna. Sacrifices were made at that yajna. Folklore in Tamil refers to Iravan, born to Ulupi and Arjuna as the person sacrificed at this yajna done before the war. However Mahabharata does not support this view but describes Iravan’s fight and his death on the 8th day of the war.