The genetic and cultural similarities between people
of West Asia and India can be accounted for by some of the migrations mentioned
by Krishna in Mahabharata (2-14) The context was post-Jarāsandha and Krishna
suggesting to Yudhishtira to conduct Rajasuya yajna. Krishna narrates the
series of troubles faced by his clan (Yadava – Bhojas) on account of Jarāsandha
and where they had gone in a bid to escape the wrath of Jarāsandha. Some of the
names and incidents mentioned by Krishna can be cross-checked by other sources,
offering proof of historicity of those and other references. There are some who
were residents of western section of India beyond the Indus. A list of all of
them is given below with cross- references wherever available.
Those who
were friends of Jarasandha. (Some of them were located outside
India)
1. Sisupala, (related to Krishna)
2. Vaka (king of Karushas)
3. Hansa
4. Dimvaka
5. Dantavakra
6. Karusha
7. Karava
8. Meghavahana
9. Bhagadatta, * King of
Yavanas (
He was a vassal of Jarasandha as per the
description. He was affectionate towards Yudhishtira and was a friend of Pandu,
says Krishna.
It must be noted that a king almost by the same name
ruled parts of Persia. He was Bagadates I, who lived in the
3rd century BCE and was supposed to be an indigenous ruler of Persia.
He belonged to Persis (Fars) in present day Iran. Seleucus I Nicator
was his contemporary.
Source: Wikipedia
Coins of Bagadates show him as standing in front of Zoroastrian
fire altar or sitting with a staff. (below)
The phonetic similarity with Bagadatta, mentioned by
Krishna as powerful king of the Yavanas cannot be dismissed lightly, as Bagadates means
‘Given by God’ in Old Iranian. The meaning is the same for Bhagadatta also.
Datta means given. Bhaga is another name for Sun. Bhagadatta is he who has
been given by the Sun. Bhagadatta as a friend and vassal of Jarāsandha and
as an old friend of Pandu, in good relationship with Yudhishtira can
be expected to have taken back home many Vedic practices and principles.
From Krishna's words, it is known that he had a special relationship
with Jarāsandha.
The phonetic similarity between Jarāsandha and Zoroastrian lends
credibility to the view that the religious codes followed by the followers of Jarāsandha
came to be known as Zoroastrian religion or sect. Almost all the friends of Jarāsandha
were in the West. Those who shared friendship with Jarāsandha but preferred to
stay in the west followed the same Vedic religion of Jarāsandha, but some of
them kept off from mainstream Vedic India. The isolation caused by this could
have given rise to their Vedic life becoming different in due course.
The Vedic knowledge they had taken with them had become
stagnant or mutated in course of time in the wake of reduced connection with
mainland India after Jarāsandha was gone. That is how we have come to see some similarities
between Zoroastrian Avesta and the 8th Mandala of Rig Veda. (refer Shrikant Talageri)
The 8th Mandala is unique in that the
name Krishna is mentioned at quite a few verses. {This will be written in
another article}. What is being highlighted here is that parts of 8th
Mandala of Rig Veda was formed in Krishna’s times or a little later and people
who have gone to the west of India had knowledge of it. With passing of times,
parts of that knowledge had found their way into Zend Avesta.
Now continuing with other names,
10. Purujit, maternal uncle of Yudhishtira was favourably
disposed to Jarāsandha. (related to Krishna)
11. Paundaraka
and Vasudeva of Chedi.
12. Bhishmaka, king of Bhojas. (related to Krishna)
13. Krata-Kausikas (related to Krishna)
Those
who fled to the West for fear of Jarāsandha
1. 18 tribes of Bhojas
2. the Surasenas
3. the Bhadrakas
4. the Vodhas
5. the Salwas
6. the Patachchavas
7. the Susthalas
8. the Mukuttas
9. the Kulindas
10. the Kuntis (till this all were related to Krishna)
11. Salwayana
12. the southern Panchalas
13. the eastern Kosalas
Those who
fled to South (India)
1. the Matsyas
2. the Sannyastapadas
Those who
fled in all directions
1. all the Panchalas.
Krishna also
fled to the west. But this territory is Dvārakā!
Krishna says that 18
branches of Yadavas left along with him to start a new life in Dvārakā. He
mentions this twice in this chapter in his conversation with Yudhishtira.
It must be noted that exactly 18 kings related to Krishna left for Tamil lands
around 1500 BCE which is the date of decline of IVC.
Whatever similarity is found in excavated regions of
Tamilnadu and Kerala with IVC is due to this migration to the south.
Any interpretation
of genetic similarity with people of south and north India with regions
west of the Indus must take into account these dispersals.
Reference:
Sanskrit version of the chapter: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/mbs/mbs02013.htm
* Raghu
Vamsam authored by Kalidasa says that King Raghu, the
ancestor of Rama went to Parasīka (Persia) during his Dig-Vijaya and brought it
under his control. This is proof of connection with Persia even before Ramayana
times. Bhagadatta’s cordial relationship with both Pandu and Jarāsandha alike
could perhaps be the result of a conscious effort to keep up good relationship with
powerful kings of Bharat to avoid any hostility. That perhaps continued till
the times of Seleucus Nicator under whom Bagadates I served as a vassal.
