The non-existent 13-day Twin eclipses (Part 30 of the Mahabharata series)

 In the 30th part of the Mahabharata series, I've explained why the claim of 13-day twin eclipses by researchers is irrelevant. Dr. S. Balakrishna's interpretation of Trayodashi tithi as the 13th Julian day led to this misconception. He misinterpreted Amavasya and Pournami in Trayodashi as twin eclipses separated by 13 Julian days.

Unfortunately, most researchers followed this view. I'm highlighting issues with the 13-day twin eclipse proposed by the 3162 BCE researcher and triple eclipses by the 3067 BCE researcher.

The latter's second eclipse, picked from Vana parvan, was assumed to be in Upapalavya in Udhyoga Parvan - a clear discrepancy. Other researchers, like the 5561 BCE and ‘Dwaraka- in-Dholavira’ researchers are not the only people giving you hearty laugh, here are others too, amusing you with funny interpretations. Watch the video and share widely.